Recreation visitor attitudes towards management-ignited prescribed fires in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, Montana
Version 2 2024-06-05, 04:28Version 2 2024-06-05, 04:28
Version 1 2008-01-01, 00:00Version 1 2008-01-01, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-05, 04:28authored byK Knotek, AE Watson, Bill BorrieBill Borrie, JG Whitmore, D Turner
Research at the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex in Montana explored differences in recreation visitors' attitudes towards the use of management-ignited prescribed fires in the wilderness. A mail-back survey of visitors (n = 291) during the 2004 season revealed that over hall of visitors would accept prescribed fires in wilderness. This support did not vary by ignition purpose: (a) to restore the natural role of fire or (b) to reduce hazardous fuels and potential for fire escaping to non-wilderness lands. Local visitors, however, were significantly more accepting of prescribed fires than non-local visitors across both ignition purposes. A smaller proportion of visitors than was expected considered the presence of natural fire undesirable. Copyright 2008 National Recreation and Park Association.