Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Remuneration committees and attribution disclosures on remuneration decisions: Australian evidence

journal contribution
posted on 2019-09-01, 00:00 authored by Sutha KanapathippillaiSutha Kanapathippillai, Dessalegn Mihret, Shireenjit Johl
The use of remuneration committees (RCs) to foster corporate accountability concerning executive remuneration decisions
has attracted increasing public attention following various corporate scandals and the recent global fnancial crisis (GFC).
This study empirically examines the link between RCs and attributions disclosures, i.e. explanation of reasons for executive remuneration decisions. Using a sample of 644 firm-year observations drawn from top 200 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)-listed firms from 2007 to 2011, we find that firms with RCs tend to voluntarily disclose attribution, and the extent of disclosures increases with remuneration committee quality. While existence of attribution disclosures is related to pay performance sensitivity, the extent of disclosures does not show incremental effect on pay-performance sensitivity. The results also show that the presence and quality of RCs are positively associated with internal attribution disclosures regarding executive remuneration decisions during the GFC, suggesting corporate responsiveness to corporate accountability demands at times of economic crisis.

History

Journal

Journal of business ethics

Volume

158

Issue

4

Pagination

1063 - 1082

Publisher

Springer Verlag

Location

Dordrecht, the Netherlands

ISSN

0167-4544

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature