Retrievable IVC filters – friend or foe
Version 2 2024-06-13, 13:06Version 2 2024-06-13, 13:06
Version 1 2019-06-08, 12:45Version 1 2019-06-08, 12:45
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 13:06 authored by E Ryan, HK Kok, MJ Lee© 2016 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Venous thromboembolism is a common condition with widely varied outcomes. Pulmonary embolism is associated with a case-fatality rate of up to 8%, increasing up to 18-fold in massive PE. Pharmacological treatment of VTE with anticoagulant medication (AC) is the first line therapy of choice. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are indicated as a short-term replacement for AC in certain circumstances. Most of the evidence concerning IVCF pertains to permanent filters and older filter models. Limited evidence for retrievable IVCF results in poor consensus regarding indications, follow-up and retrieval. Complications increase with dwell-time and retrieval success rates decline. Professional bodies advocate strict guideline adherence and robust strategies for filter monitoring to maximise retrieval rate.
History
Journal
SurgeonVolume
15Pagination
104-108Location
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
1479-666XLanguage
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2016, Royal College of Surgeons of EdinburghIssue
2Publisher
ElsevierUsage metrics
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC