Deakin University
Browse

Retrievable IVC filters – friend or foe

Version 2 2024-06-13, 13:06
Version 1 2019-06-08, 12:45
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 13:06 authored by E Ryan, HK Kok, MJ Lee
© 2016 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Venous thromboembolism is a common condition with widely varied outcomes. Pulmonary embolism is associated with a case-fatality rate of up to 8%, increasing up to 18-fold in massive PE. Pharmacological treatment of VTE with anticoagulant medication (AC) is the first line therapy of choice. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are indicated as a short-term replacement for AC in certain circumstances. Most of the evidence concerning IVCF pertains to permanent filters and older filter models. Limited evidence for retrievable IVCF results in poor consensus regarding indications, follow-up and retrieval. Complications increase with dwell-time and retrieval success rates decline. Professional bodies advocate strict guideline adherence and robust strategies for filter monitoring to maximise retrieval rate.

History

Journal

Surgeon

Volume

15

Pagination

104-108

Location

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

ISSN

1479-666X

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2016, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

Issue

2

Publisher

Elsevier

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC