The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) regulatory oversight of securities and financial markets has increased considerably over time. However, the wisdom of this model has recently been challenged by the Hayne Royal Commission as ASIC’s enforcement activities were found to be relatively toothless. Accordingly, many criticised the agency and called for further ASIC reform. After the Global Financial Crisis, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) faced similar criticisms of regulatory failure. As such, this article analyses the SEC regulatory structure, enforcement activities and governmental resources, and compares certain indicators of effectiveness with those of ASIC over the past quarter-century. By comparing ASIC with the world’s biggest capital market regulator this article analyses the viability of further reform of ASIC and argues that ASIC is woefully underresourced to engage in increased enforcement action.
History
Journal
Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice
Volume
31
Pagination
71-87
Location
Sydney, N.S.W.
ISSN
1034-3040
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal article