Deakin University
Browse

Role of large language models in mental health research: an international survey of researchers’ practices and perspectives

Download (481.33 kB)
Version 2 2025-07-03, 06:23
Version 1 2025-06-23, 02:49
journal contribution
posted on 2025-07-03, 06:23 authored by Jake LinardonJake Linardon, Mariel MesserMariel Messer, Cleo AndersonCleo Anderson, Chi Ching Claudia LiuChi Ching Claudia Liu, Zoe McClureZoe McClure, Hannah JarmanHannah Jarman, Simon B Goldberg, John Torous
BackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) offer significant potential to streamline research workflows and enhance productivity. However, limited data exist on the extent of their adoption within the mental health research community.ObjectiveWe examined how LLMs are being used in mental health research, the types of tasks they support, barriers to their adoption and broader attitudes towards their integration.Methods714 mental health researchers from 42 countries and various career stages (from PhD student, to early career researcher, to Professor) completed a survey assessing LLM-related practices and perspectives.Findings496 (69.5%) reported using LLMs to assist with research, with 94% indicating use of ChatGPT. The most common applications were for proofreading written work (69%) and refining or generating code (49%). LLM use was more prevalent among early career researchers. Common challenges reported by users included inaccurate responses (78%), ethical concerns (48%) and biased outputs (27%). However, many users indicated that LLMs improved efficiency (73%) and output quality (44%). Reasons for non-use were concerns with ethical issues (53%) and accuracy of outputs (50%). Most agreed that they wanted more training on responsible use (77%), that researchers should be required to disclose use of LLMs in manuscripts (79%) and that they were concerned about LLMs affecting how their work is evaluated (60%).ConclusionWhile LLM use is widespread in mental health research, key barriers and implementation challenges remain.Clinical implicationsLLMs may streamline mental health research processes, but clear guidelines are needed to support their ethical and transparent use across the research lifecycle.

History

Journal

BMJ Mental Health

Volume

28

Article number

e301787

Pagination

1-7

Location

London, Eng.

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

2755-9734

eISSN

2755-9734

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

1

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group