dew-shouldistayorshould-2015.pdf (1.13 MB)
Should I stay or should I go? Exploring the job preferences of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural Australia
journal contribution
posted on 2015-06-30, 00:00 authored by Gisselle Gallego, Angela DewAngela Dew, Michelle Lincoln, Anita Bundy, Rebecca Jean Chedid, Kim Bulkeley, Jennie Brentnall, Craig VeitchINTRODUCTION: The uneven distribution of allied health professionals (AHPs) in rural and remote Australia and other countries is well documented. In Australia, like elsewhere, service delivery to rural and remote communities is complicated because relatively small numbers of clients are dispersed over large geographic areas. This uneven distribution of AHPs impacts significantly on the provision of services particularly in areas of special need such as mental health, aged care and disability services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the relative importance that AHPs (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech pathologists and psychologists - "therapists") living in a rural area of Australia and working with people with disability, place on different job characteristics and how these may affect their retention. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed to AHPs working with people with disability in a rural area of Australia over a 3-month period. Information was sought about various aspects of the AHPs' current job, and their workforce preferences were explored using a best-worst scaling discrete choice experiment (BWSDCE). Conditional logistic and latent class regression models were used to determine AHPs' relative preferences for six different job attributes. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine AHPs completed the survey; response rate was 51 %. Of those, 165 completed the BWSDCE task. For this group of AHPs, "high autonomy of practice" is the most valued attribute level, followed by "travel BWSDCE arrangements: one or less nights away per month", "travel arrangements: two or three nights away per month" and "adequate access to professional development". On the other hand, the least valued attribute levels were "travel arrangements: four or more nights per month", "limited autonomy of practice" and "minimal access to professional development". Except for "some job flexibility", all other attributes had a statistical influence on AHPs' job preference. Preferences differed according to age, marital status and having dependent children. CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed the identification of factors that contribute to AHPs' employment decisions about staying and working in a rural area. This information can improve job designs in rural areas to increase retention.
History
Journal
Human resources for healthVolume
13Article number
53Pagination
1 - 13Publisher
BioMed CentralLocation
London, Eng.Publisher DOI
Link to full text
eISSN
1478-4491Language
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2015, Gallego et al.Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
PreferencesRetentionRuralDisabilityBest-worst scalingAustraliaScience & TechnologySocial SciencesLife Sciences & BiomedicineHealth Policy & ServicesIndustrial Relations & LaborHealth Care Sciences & ServicesBusiness & EconomicsNEW-SOUTH-WALESDISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTSWORKFORCERECRUITMENTINCENTIVESEMPLOYMENTTHERAPISTSONTARIOSECTOR
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC