Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Specificity and detail in autobiographical memory retrieval: a multi-site (re)investigation

journal contribution
posted on 2020-11-02, 00:00 authored by David HallfordDavid Hallford, Tom J Barry, Eline Belmans, Filip Raes, Samantha Dax, Yuki Nishiguchi, Keisuke Takano
This investigation examined conflicting suggestions regarding the association between problems retrieving specific autobiographical memories and the tendency to retrieve the details of these memories. We also examined whether these tendencies are differentially related to depression symptoms. U.S., Belgian, Hong Kong and Japanese participants retrieved memories related to cue words. Responses were coded for if they referred to a specific event (i.e., an event lasting less than 24 h) and their details (What? Where? Who?). Across sites, and in meta-analyses, the retrieval of more specific memories was associated with retrieval of more details. Memories that were specific included more detail than non-specific memories. Across sites, retrieval of more specific memories and more detail was associated with less severe depression symptoms. Episodic specificity and detailedness are related but separable constructs. Future investigations of autobiographical memory specificity, and methods for alleviating problematic specificity, should consider measures of episodic detailedness.

History

Journal

Memory

Volume

29

Issue

1

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Location

Abingdon, Eng.

ISSN

0965-8211

eISSN

1464-0686

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2020, Informa UK