Deakin University
Browse

Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service

Download (1.4 MB)
Version 2 2025-04-04, 00:34
Version 1 2024-08-21, 04:12
journal contribution
posted on 2025-04-04, 00:34 authored by PJ Batterham, M Martin, AL Calear, N Cherbuin, M Romaniuk, M Banfield, Peter ButterworthPeter Butterworth, M Burvill, D Massang
AbstractBackgroundOutcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders.ObjectiveInformed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families.MethodTwenty‐nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi‐structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data.ResultsClients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework.ConclusionsFindings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client‐led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.

Location

London, Eng.

Open access

  • Yes

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Journal

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volume

30

Pagination

1728-1737

ISSN

1356-1294

eISSN

1365-2753

Issue

8

Publisher

Wiley

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC