allender-systamaticexamination-2016.pdf (600.28 kB)
Systematic examination of publiclyavailable information reveals the diverse and extensive corporate political activity of the food industry in Australia
journal contribution
posted on 2016-01-01, 00:00 authored by M Mialon, Boyd Swinburn, Steven AllenderSteven Allender, Gary SacksGary SacksAbstract
Background
The political influence of the food industry, referred to as
corporate political activity (CPA), represents a potential barrier to the
development and implementation of effective public health policies for
non-communicable diseases prevention. This paper reports on the feasibility and
limitations of using publicly-available information to identify and monitor the
CPA of the food industry in Australia.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted for information from food
industry, government and other publicly-available data sources in Australia. Data
was collected in relation to five key food industry actors: the Australian Food
and Grocery Council; Coca Cola; McDonald’s; Nestle; and Woolworths, for the period
January 2012 to February 2015. Data analysis was guided by an existing framework
for classifying CPA strategies of the food industry.
Results
The selected food industry actors used multiple CPA strategies, with
‘information and messaging’ and ‘constituency building’ strategies most
prominent.
Conclusions
The systematic analysis of publicly-available information over a
limited period was able to identify diverse and extensive CPA strategies of the
food industry in Australia. This approach can contribute to accountability
mechanisms for NCD prevention.
Background
The political influence of the food industry, referred to as
corporate political activity (CPA), represents a potential barrier to the
development and implementation of effective public health policies for
non-communicable diseases prevention. This paper reports on the feasibility and
limitations of using publicly-available information to identify and monitor the
CPA of the food industry in Australia.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted for information from food
industry, government and other publicly-available data sources in Australia. Data
was collected in relation to five key food industry actors: the Australian Food
and Grocery Council; Coca Cola; McDonald’s; Nestle; and Woolworths, for the period
January 2012 to February 2015. Data analysis was guided by an existing framework
for classifying CPA strategies of the food industry.
Results
The selected food industry actors used multiple CPA strategies, with
‘information and messaging’ and ‘constituency building’ strategies most
prominent.
Conclusions
The systematic analysis of publicly-available information over a
limited period was able to identify diverse and extensive CPA strategies of the
food industry in Australia. This approach can contribute to accountability
mechanisms for NCD prevention.
History
Journal
BMC Public HealthVolume
16Issue
1Article number
ARTN 283Publisher
BMCLocation
EnglandPublisher DOI
ISSN
1471-2458eISSN
1471-2458Language
EnglishPublication classification
C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2016, The AuthorsUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC