- No file added yet -
The Health Star Rating system – is its reductionist (nutrient) approach a benefit or risk for tackling dietary risk factors?
Version 2 2024-06-04, 04:08Version 2 2024-06-04, 04:08
Version 1 2019-04-11, 10:50Version 1 2019-04-11, 10:50
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 04:08 authored by Mark LawrenceMark Lawrence, CM Pollard, HA Vidgen, Julie WoodsJulie Woods© 2019 Lawrence et al. The Australian Government’s voluntary Health Star Rating (HSR) system has potential to provide a user-friendly approach to help shoppers choose healthier packaged food options. However, despite evidence that it is dietary imbalances and excesses that are the predominant causes of diet-related noncommunicable diseases and obesity, the star-rating system’s design is based on a reductionist (nutrient) world view of nutrition science which is not a fit-for-purpose solution to the cause of the problem. As a result, the HSR system frequently is inadverently contradicting Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) recommendations, and promoting the marketing of discretionary and ultraprocessed foods. This perspective article looks at how the HSR system could be reformed to complement the ADG and stresses the overriding priority is to position it within, and not be a distraction from, a comprehensive national nutrition policy if dietary risk factors are to be effectively tackled.
History
Journal
Public Health Research and PracticeVolume
29Location
Ultimo, N.S.W.Publisher DOI
Open access
- Yes
Link to full text
eISSN
2204-2091Publication classification
C2 Other contribution to refereed journalIssue
1Publisher
Sax InstituteUsage metrics
Categories
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC