Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

The application of the psychological contract to workplace safety

journal contribution
posted on 2006-01-01, 00:00 authored by Arlene WalkerArlene Walker, Dot Hutton
Introduction: Psychological contracts of safety are conceptualized as the beliefs of individuals about reciprocal safety obligations inferred from implicit or explicit promises. Although the literature on psychological contracts is growing, the existence of psychological contracts in relation to safety has not been established. The research sought to identify psychological contracts in the conversations of employees about safety, by demonstrating reciprocity in relation to employer and employee safety obligations. The identified safety obligations were used to develop a measure of psychological contracts of safety. Method: The participants were 131 employees attending safety training sessions in retail and manufacturing organizations. Non-participant observation was used to collect the data during safety training sessions. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. Categories for coding were established through identification of language markers that demonstrated contingencies or other implied obligations. Results: Direct evidence of reciprocity between employer safety obligations and employee safety obligations was found in statements from the participants demonstrating psychological contracts. A comprehensive list of perceived employer and employee safety obligations was compiled and developed into a measure of psychological contracts of safety. A small sample of 33 safety personnel was used to validate the safety obligations. Conclusions and impact on industry: Implications of these findings for safety and psychological contract research are discussed.

History

Journal

Journal of safety research

Volume

37

Issue

5

Pagination

433 - 441

Publisher

Pergamon - Elservier

Location

London, England

ISSN

0022-4375

eISSN

1879-1247

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2006, National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd