The continuous disclosure obligations in Australia: do they still have substantive content and can those relying on public disclosures make confident informed decisions?
Version 2 2024-06-17, 22:37Version 2 2024-06-17, 22:37
Version 1 2017-02-03, 14:29Version 1 2017-02-03, 14:29
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-17, 22:37authored byGL North
The Australian Securities Exchange has recently amended Guidance Note 8 to Listing Rule 3.1 to provide greater clarity around the continuous disclosure obligations. This article argues that the requirements to update the market on changes in trading conditions and associated changes to expected earnings are unduly ambiguous and that persons relying on publicly disclosed company information may struggle to make confident informed decisions. The move from objective earnings variations to opaque and transient private measures as the basis for determining disclosure of earnings related news is viewed as a retrograde step that does not accord with international best practice. These amendments are expected to weaken the corporate disclosure regime, discourage the provision of public guidance by listed companies, and raise the bar for those involved with supervision and enforcement of company disclosure matters.
History
Journal
Australian Journal of Corporate Law
Volume
28
Pagination
233-252
Location
Chatswood, N.S.W.
ISSN
1037-4124
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal article