Version 2 2024-06-17, 23:51Version 2 2024-06-17, 23:51
Version 1 2017-04-06, 12:16Version 1 2017-04-06, 12:16
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-17, 23:51authored byL Waller, K McCallum
This article analyzes media-related policy-making practices in the bu-reaucratic realm of Indigenous affairs in Australia. It considers the implications of an increasingly media-oriented bureaucracy for particular social policies in the light of recent mediatization theory. A qualitative study explored how bu-reaucrats working in Indigenous affairs articulated their understanding of the news media’s role in policy development. The article identifies and describes five dimensions of mediatized bureaucratic practice – expertise, monitoring, anticipating, reacting and strategizing – and concludes that mediatized practi-ces have permeated the very fabric of the policy-making process. It finds evi-dence of an increasingly intimate relationship between the logics and agendas of mainstream news media and bureaucrats working on complex and politically controversial policies. In Australia, mediatized policy-making practices contrib-uted to both the intractability of Indigenous affairs policy and the introduction of radical policy solutions to address apparent policy failure. These findings add to the body of empirical research exploring the mediatization of policy-making and its implications for politically sensitive fields.
History
Journal
Communications: the European journal of communication research
This research output may contain the names and images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people now deceased. We apologise for any distress that may occur.