The effect of local vs remote experimental pain on motor learning and sensorimotor integration using a complex typing task

Recent work demonstrated that capsaicin-induced acute pain improved motor learning performance; however, baseline accuracy was very high, making it impossible to discern the impact of acute pain onmotor learning and retention. In addition, the effects of the spatial location of capsaicin application were not explored. Two experiments were conducted to determine the interactive effects of acute pain vs control (experiment 1) and local vs remote acute pain (experiment 2) on motor learning and sensorimotor processing. For both experiments, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitudes and motor learning acquisition and retention (accuracy and response time) data were collected at baseline, after application, and after motor learning. Experiment 1: N11 (P , 0.05), N13 (P , 0.05), and N30 (P , 0.05) SEP peak amplitudes increased after motor learning in both groups, whereas the N20 SEP peak increased in the control group (P , 0.05). At baseline, the intervention group outperformed the control group in accuracy (P , 0.001). Response time improved after motor learning (P , 0.001) and at retention (P , 0.001). Experiment 2: The P25 SEP peak decreased in the local group after application of capsaicin cream (P , 0.01), whereas the N30 SEP peaks increased after motor learning in both groups (P , 0.05). Accuracy improved in the local group at retention (P , 0.005), and response time improved after motor learning (P , 0.005) and at retention (P , 0.001). This study suggests that acute pain may increase focal attention to the body part used in motor learning, contributing to our understanding of how the location of pain impacts somatosensory processing and the associated motor learning.