File(s) not publicly available
The effects of fraud risk and management representation on auditors’ hypothesis generation
journal contribution
posted on 2001-01-01, 00:00 authored by T B P Ng, W Green, Roger SimnettRoger SimnettHypothesis generation is considered to be critical to the effectiveness and efficiency of diagnostic processes in auditing. Using a between-subjects experimental design, this work examines the impact of fraud risk and the availability of a non-misstatement management explanation on auditors’ hypothesis generation performance. The context is when managers undertake analytical procedures at the planning stage of the audit. The results indicate that auditors are sensitive to increased fraud risk by generating more fraud hypotheses, while the number of misstatement hypotheses generated is not affected by fraud risk. The availability of a non-misstatement management explanation was found not to interfere with auditors’ hypothesis generation performance, but facilitated the generation of proportionately more misstatement and fraud hypotheses from the same transaction cycle as that indicated by the management explanation. Together, these findings provide some insights on the sensitivity of auditors’ hypothesis generation to fraud risk and whether this sensitivity could be undermined by the availability of management representations. © 2001 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
History
Journal
AbacusVolume
37Issue
3Pagination
352 - 368Publisher DOI
ISSN
0001-3072eISSN
1467-6281Publication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal articleUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC