Deakin University
Browse

The future of psychoanalytic institutes

Version 2 2024-06-16, 13:28
Version 1 2014-10-27, 16:25
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-16, 13:28 authored by D Kirsner
The author contends that both conceptual and institutional problems permeate psychoanalytic institutes. Although institutional problems are historically based, they also derive from confusions around ill-defined concepts that lead to arbitrariness, authoritarianism, and the stifling of creativity. Psychoanalysis is a humanistic discipline that is touted as a science but is organized as a religion. Problems surrounding the right to train pervade psychoanalytic schisms, and transmission comes through processes of anointment. Institutional "false expertise" invokes the aura of anointment where training analysts pass down received truth through an esoteric pipeline depending on genealogy instead of function. Quasi-religious thinking and politics rush in to fill the gap between the level of claimed knowledge that affords qualification and the far lower level of real knowledge. Institutes should rely on evidence of candidates' performance and engage in open-ended inquiry

History

Journal

Psychoanalytic psychology,

Volume

18

Season

Spring

Pagination

195-212

Location

New Jersey, N.J.

ISSN

0736-9735

eISSN

1939-1331

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2001, American Psychological Association

Issue

2

Publisher

Educational Publishing Foundation

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC