File(s) stored somewhere else
Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Deakin University and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
The impact of coalition characteristics on outcomes in community-based initiatives targeting the social determinants of health: a systematic review
journal contributionposted on 2023-02-08, 22:58 authored by Phoebe Nagorcka-Smith, Kristy BoltonKristy Bolton, J Dam, Melanie NicholsMelanie Nichols, Laura AlstonLaura Alston, Michael JohnstoneMichael Johnstone, Steven AllenderSteven Allender
Background: Coalitions are a popular mechanism for delivering community-based health promotion. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize research that has quantitatively analyzed the association between coalition characteristics and outcomes in community-based initiatives targeting the social determinants of health. Coalition characteristics described elements of their structure or functioning, and outcomes referred to both proximal and distal community changes. Methods: Authors searched six electronic databases to identify peer reviewed, published studies that analyzed the relationship between coalition characteristics and outcomes in community-based initiatives between 1980 and 2021. Studies were included if they were published in English and quantitatively analyzed the link between coalition characteristics and outcomes. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute analytical cross-sectional studies assessment tool. Results: The search returned 10,030 unique records. After screening, 26 studies were included from six countries. Initiatives targeted drug use, health equity, nutrition, physical activity, child and youth development, crime, domestic violence, and neighbourhood improvement. Community outcomes measured included perceived effectiveness (n=10), policy, systems or environment change (n=9), and community readiness or capacity (n=7). Analyses included regression or correlation analysis (n=16) and structural equation or pathway modelling (n=10). Studies varied in quality, with a lack of data collection tool validation presenting the most prominent limitation to study quality. Statistically significant associations were noted between community outcomes and wide range of coalition characteristics, including community context, resourcing, coalition structure, member characteristics, engagement, satisfaction, group facilitation, communication, group dynamics, relationships, community partnership, and health promotion planning and implementation. Conclusion: Existing literature demonstrates that coalition characteristics, including best practice health promotion planning and evaluation, influence community outcomes. The field of coalition research would benefit from more consistent description and measurement of coalition characteristics and outcomes, and efforts to evaluate coalitions in a wider range of countries around the world. Further research using empirical community outcome indicators, and methods that consider the interrelationship of variables, is warranted. Trial registration: A protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020205988).
JournalBMC Public Health
Article numberARTN 1358
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Science & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicinePublic, Environmental & Occupational HealthCollaborationCoalitionsCoalition FunctioningCoalition ImpactCommunity-Based PreventionHealth PromotionAREA-BASED REGENERATIONABUSE PREVENTIONNEW-DEALCAPACITYPARTNERSHIPCITIESPRINCIPLESFRAMEWORKPATHWAYSSYNERGYAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionHumansResidence CharacteristicsSocial Determinants of HealthPreventionClinical ResearchPediatric16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions