Version 2 2024-06-06, 11:43Version 2 2024-06-06, 11:43
Version 1 2015-04-10, 09:20Version 1 2015-04-10, 09:20
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-06, 11:43authored byLG Carvalheiro, JC Biesmeijer, G Benadi, J Fründ, M Stang, I Bartomeus, CN Kaiser-Bunbury, M Baude, SIF Gomes, V Merckx, KCR Baldock, ATD Bennett, R Boada, R Bommarco, R Cartar, N Chacoff, J Dänhardt, LV Dicks, CF Dormann, J Ekroos, KSE Henson, A Holzschuh, RR Junker, M Lopezaraiza-Mikel, J Memmott, A Montero-Castaño, IL Nelson, T Petanidou, EF Power, M Rundlöf, HG Smith, JC Stout, K Temitope, T Tscharntke, T Tscheulin, M Vilà, WE Kunin
Co-flowering plant species commonly share flower visitors, and thus have the potential to influence each other's pollination. In this study we analysed 750 quantitative plant-pollinator networks from 28 studies representing diverse biomes worldwide. We show that the potential for one plant species to influence another indirectly via shared pollinators was greater for plants whose resources were more abundant (higher floral unit number and nectar sugar content) and more accessible. The potential indirect influence was also stronger between phylogenetically closer plant species and was independent of plant geographic origin (native vs. non-native). The positive effect of nectar sugar content and phylogenetic proximity was much more accentuated for bees than for other groups. Consequently, the impact of these factors depends on the pollination mode of plants, e.g. bee or fly pollinated. Our findings may help predict which plant species have the greatest importance in the functioning of plant-pollination networks.
History
Journal
Ecology letters
Volume
17
Pagination
1389-1399
Location
Chichester, England
Open access
Yes
ISSN
1461-023X
eISSN
1461-0248
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal article