Deakin University
Browse

The promise of community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution

journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-17, 03:32 authored by DWA Noble, ZA Xirocostas, NC Wu, AR Martinig, RA Almeida, KR Bairos-Novak, H Balti, MG Bertram, L Bliard, JA Brand, I Byrne, YC Chan, DJ Clink, Q Corbel, RA Correia, J Crawford-Ash, A Culina, E D'bastiani, GG Deme, M De Souza Leite, F Dhellemmes, S Dimri, SM Drobniak, AD Elsy, SE Everingham, SJL Gascoigne, MJ Grainger, GC Hossack, KA Hovstad, ER Ivimey-Cook, ML Jones, I Kačergytė, G Küstner, DC Leibold, MM Mair, J Martin, A Mizuno, IR Moodie, D Moreau, RE O'dea, JA Orr, M Paquet, R Parajuli, JL Pick, P Pottier, M Purgar, P Recio, DG Roche, R Royauté, S Shafiei Sabet, JMG Segovia, I Silva, A Sánchez-Tójar, BE Soares, B Szabo, E Takola, ESJ Thoré, B Timilsina, NE Van Dis, WCEP Verberk, SJG Vriend, KH Wild, C Williams, Y Yang, S Nakagawa, M Lagisz
Publishing preprints is quickly becoming commonplace in ecology and evolutionary biology. Preprints can facilitate the rapid sharing of scientific knowledge establishing precedence and enabling feedback from the research community before peer review. Yet, significant barriers to preprint use exist, including language barriers, a lack of understanding about the benefits of preprints and a lack of diversity in the types of research outputs accepted (e.g. reports). Community-driven preprint initiatives can allow a research community to come together to break down these barriers to improve equity and coverage of global knowledge. Here, we explore the first preprints uploaded to EcoEvoRxiv ( n = 1216), a community-driven preprint server for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, to characterize preprint use in ecology, evolution and conservation. Our perspective piece highlights some of the unique initiatives that EcoEvoRxiv has taken to break down barriers to scientific publishing by exploring the composition of articles, how gender and career stage influence preprint use, whether preprints are associated with greater open science practices (e.g. code and data sharing) and tracking preprint publication outcomes. Our analysis identifies areas that we still need to improve upon but highlights how community-driven initiatives, such as EcoEvoRxiv , can play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices in biology.

History

Journal

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences

Volume

292

Article number

20241487

Pagination

1-9

Location

London, Eng.

Open access

  • No

ISSN

0962-8452

eISSN

1471-2954

Language

eng

Issue

2039

Publisher

The Royal Society