The promise of community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution
journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-17, 03:32authored byDWA Noble, ZA Xirocostas, NC Wu, AR Martinig, RA Almeida, KR Bairos-Novak, H Balti, MG Bertram, L Bliard, JA Brand, I Byrne, YC Chan, DJ Clink, Q Corbel, RA Correia, J Crawford-Ash, A Culina, E D'bastiani, GG Deme, M De Souza Leite, F Dhellemmes, S Dimri, SM Drobniak, AD Elsy, SE Everingham, SJL Gascoigne, MJ Grainger, GC Hossack, KA Hovstad, ER Ivimey-Cook, ML Jones, I Kačergytė, G Küstner, DC Leibold, MM Mair, J Martin, A Mizuno, IR Moodie, D Moreau, RE O'dea, JA Orr, M Paquet, R Parajuli, JL Pick, P Pottier, M Purgar, P Recio, DG Roche, R Royauté, S Shafiei Sabet, JMG Segovia, I Silva, A Sánchez-Tójar, BE Soares, B Szabo, E Takola, ESJ Thoré, B Timilsina, NE Van Dis, WCEP Verberk, SJG Vriend, KH Wild, C Williams, Y Yang, S Nakagawa, M Lagisz
Publishing preprints is quickly becoming commonplace in ecology and evolutionary biology. Preprints can facilitate the rapid sharing of scientific knowledge establishing precedence and enabling feedback from the research community before peer review. Yet, significant barriers to preprint use exist, including language barriers, a lack of understanding about the benefits of preprints and a lack of diversity in the types of research outputs accepted (e.g. reports). Community-driven preprint initiatives can allow a research community to come together to break down these barriers to improve equity and coverage of global knowledge. Here, we explore the first preprints uploaded to
EcoEvoRxiv
(
n
= 1216), a community-driven preprint server for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, to characterize preprint use in ecology, evolution and conservation. Our perspective piece highlights some of the unique initiatives that
EcoEvoRxiv
has taken to break down barriers to scientific publishing by exploring the composition of articles, how gender and career stage influence preprint use, whether preprints are associated with greater open science practices (e.g. code and data sharing) and tracking preprint publication outcomes. Our analysis identifies areas that we still need to improve upon but highlights how community-driven initiatives, such as
EcoEvoRxiv
, can play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices in biology.
History
Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences