The relative value of different QALY types
Version 2 2024-06-13, 16:10Version 2 2024-06-13, 16:10
Version 1 2020-03-01, 00:00Version 1 2020-03-01, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 16:10 authored by E Lancsar, Y Gu, D Gyrd-Hansen, J Butler, J Ratcliffe, L Bulfone, C Donaldson© 2020 The Authors The oft-applied assumption in the use of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in economic evaluation, that all QALYs are valued equally, has been questioned from the outset. The literature has focused on differential values of a QALY based on equity considerations such as the characteristics of the beneficiaries of the QALYs. However, a key characteristic which may affect the value of a QALY is the type of QALY itself. QALY gains can be generated purely by gains in survival, purely by improvements in quality of life, or by changes in both. Using a discrete choice experiment and a new methodological approach to the derivation of relative weights, we undertake the first direct and systematic exploration of the relative weight accorded different QALY types and do so in the presence of equity considerations; age and severity. Results provide new evidence against the normative starting point that all QALYs are valued equally.
History
Related Materials
- 1.
Location
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsOpen access
- Yes
Link to full text
Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalJournal
Journal of Health EconomicsVolume
70Article number
102303Pagination
1-13ISSN
0167-6296eISSN
1879-1646Publisher
ElsevierUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC

