Deakin University
Browse

The relative value of different QALY types

Download (941.32 kB)
Version 2 2024-06-13, 16:10
Version 1 2020-03-01, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 16:10 authored by E Lancsar, Y Gu, D Gyrd-Hansen, J Butler, J Ratcliffe, L Bulfone, C Donaldson
© 2020 The Authors The oft-applied assumption in the use of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in economic evaluation, that all QALYs are valued equally, has been questioned from the outset. The literature has focused on differential values of a QALY based on equity considerations such as the characteristics of the beneficiaries of the QALYs. However, a key characteristic which may affect the value of a QALY is the type of QALY itself. QALY gains can be generated purely by gains in survival, purely by improvements in quality of life, or by changes in both. Using a discrete choice experiment and a new methodological approach to the derivation of relative weights, we undertake the first direct and systematic exploration of the relative weight accorded different QALY types and do so in the presence of equity considerations; age and severity. Results provide new evidence against the normative starting point that all QALYs are valued equally.

History

Related Materials

Location

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Open access

  • Yes

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Journal

Journal of Health Economics

Volume

70

Article number

102303

Pagination

1-13

ISSN

0167-6296

eISSN

1879-1646

Publisher

Elsevier