Deakin University
Browse

The use of forensic tests to distinguish blowfly artifacts from human blood, semen, and saliva

Version 2 2024-06-03, 07:51
Version 1 2017-08-04, 10:12
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 07:51 authored by Annalisa DurdleAnnalisa Durdle, RJ Mitchell, RAH van Oorschot
This study investigated whether routinely used forensic tests can distinguish 3-day-old or 2-week-old fly artifacts, produced after feeding on human blood, semen, or saliva, from the biological fluid. Hemastix(®) , Hemident(™) , and Hemascein(™) were unable to distinguish blood from artifacts. Hemastix(®) returned false positives from negative controls. ABAcard(®) Hematrace(®) and Hexagon OBTI could distinguish blood from 3-day-old artifacts, but not 2-week-old artifacts. Phadebas(®) and SALIgAE(®) were unable to distinguish saliva from artifacts. RSID(™) -Saliva was able to distinguish saliva from 3-day-old artifacts, but not 2-week-old artifacts. Semen tests Seminal Acid Phosphatase, RSID(™) -Semen, and ABAcard(®) p30 were all able to distinguish semen from 3-day-old artifacts, but not 2-week-old artifacts. The tests investigated cannot be relied upon to distinguish artifacts from biological fluids. However, if an artifact is identified by its morphology, a positive result may indicate which biological fluid the fly consumed, and this knowledge may prove useful for investigators searching for DNA.

History

Journal

Journal of forensic sciences

Volume

60

Pagination

468-470

Location

London, Eng.

eISSN

1556-4029

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2014, American Academy of Forensic Sciences

Issue

2

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell