Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Towards a framework for implementing individual funding based on an Australian case study

journal contribution
posted on 2011-03-01, 00:00 authored by C Laragy, Goetz Ottmann
Although individual funding is increasingly being used around the globe as a mechanism to fund social care, its implementation is proving to be problematic and implementation strategies are not well developed. This paper proposes a framework for the successful introduction and implementation of individual funding programs based on the analysis of data collected in a qualitative case study conducted in an Australian not-for-profit disability agency over a 4-year period from 2003 to 2007. Data were gathered through participant observation and interviews with program participants and managers, and the findings were validated with those involved. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory is used to analyze the findings from a micro, meso, exo, and macro perspective. The following factors were found to be important for successful implementation: the meaningful involvement of the person with disability in decision-making; adequate resources; access to information and appropriate supports; suitable activities being available; knowledge of policies and procedures; policies ensuring oversight and responsible accountability; employment conditions for workers being safeguarded; and support for staff and managers to adjust to their new roles. Knowledge of effective implementation strategies is important for disability agencies and for governments promoting individual funding because this radically different funding arrangement requires new implementation strategies.

History

Journal

Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities

Volume

8

Issue

1

Pagination

18 - 27

Publisher

Wiley - Blackwell Publishing

Location

Hoboken, N. J.

ISSN

1741-1122

eISSN

1741-1130

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2011, International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.