Deakin University
Browse

U.S. income tax transfer pricing rules for intangibles as approximations of arm's length pricing

Version 2 2024-06-18, 07:22
Version 1 2019-07-19, 15:39
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-18, 07:22 authored by R Halperin, B Srinidhi
Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) have an incentive to shift income to lower taxed jurisdictions. On July 1, 1994, the Treasury Department issued intercompany transfer pricing regulations to mitigate such transfer of income resulting from the use of intangibles. The regulations give three alternative methods - (1) Comparable Uncontrolled Transactions (CUT), (2) Comparable Profit Method (CPM) and (3) Profit Split - to tax the intangibles. However, each of these three methods introduces incentives to the MNEs to alter resource allocations in comparison with a full-information optimum. In this paper, we examine the resource allocation changes under each method. The policy alternative to the use of such approximating measures is an increased attempt at direct valuation.

History

Journal

Accounting review

Volume

71

Pagination

61-80

Location

Lakewood Ranch, Fla.

ISSN

0001-4826

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

1996, American Accounting Association

Issue

1

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC