Urgent care centres for reducing the demand on emergency departments: a scoping review of published quantitative and qualitative studies

AbstractObjectivesTo identify published studies that examined the impact of urgent care centres on the numbers of presentations to emergency departments (EDs), or explored the experiences and views of patients and practitioners regarding urgent care centres as alternative sources of health care and advice.Study designScoping review of qualitative and quantitative studies published to 28 August 2024.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases; grey literature searches.Data synthesisOf 2698 potentially relevant publications, 51 met our inclusion criteria (30 quantitative studies; 21 qualitative studies). Urgent care centres of various types were led by general practitioners in 41 of 51 studies, primarily managed people with non‐urgent conditions or minor illnesses in 34 studies and non‐emergency but urgent conditions in eight, and nine of the 22 studies that discussed funding indicated that access to the centres was free of charge. The effect of urgent care centres on ED presentation numbers was mixed; all seven studies of after‐hours clinics, one of two studies of 24‐hour clinics, and four of five studies of walk‐in centres reported reduced ED visit numbers; in eleven studies that reported effects on hospital admissions from the ED, they were lower in seven (studies of an urgent cancer care centre, four community health centres, and a general practitioner cooperative). Patient satisfaction with urgent care centres is generally as high as with other primary care services; they preferred them to EDs, and preferred personal triage to telephone triage. Reasons for people choosing urgent care centres included easier access and the unavailability of doctors or appointments elsewhere. Clinicians reported increased workload, mixed experiences with the coordination of care, concerns about unregistered or undocumented people using the services, and protocol confusion, particularly with respect to triage. Continuity of care was a concern for both clinicians and patients.ConclusionsUrgent care centres, especially walk‐in and after‐hours clinics, can help reduce the number of ED presentations and reduce health care costs. Patient satisfaction with such clinics is high, but public health education could guide people to appropriate care for non‐urgent health problems. Training in the management of conditions frequently seen in urgent care centres is needed to ensure consistent, effective care.