Variation in health care-associated infection surveillance practices in Australia
Version 2 2024-06-04, 09:37Version 2 2024-06-04, 09:37
Version 1 2016-11-25, 15:53Version 1 2016-11-25, 15:53
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 09:37authored byPL Russo, AC Cheng, M Richards, N Graves, L Hall
In the absence of a national health care-associated infection surveillance program in Australia, differences between existing state-based programs were explored using an online survey. Only 51% of respondents who undertake surveillance have been trained, fewer than half perform surgical site infection surveillance prospectively, and only 41% indicated they risk adjust surgical site infection data. Widespread variation of surveillance methods highlights future challenges when considering the development and implementation of a national program in Australia.
History
Journal
American journal of infection control
Volume
43
Pagination
773-775
Location
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ISSN
0196-6553
eISSN
1527-3296
Language
eng
Publication classification
C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice
2015, Association for Professionals in Infection and Epidemiology