Weighty matters and dense arguments: CSF versus real experience
journal contribution
posted on 2001-06-01, 00:00authored byJohn Gough
This paper argues that the Victorian Curriculum Standards Framework (CSF II) sequencing is unhelpful for teachers of primary mathematics. 'Density' and 'speed', for example, become sensible concepts for young minds years before the CSF gives them any learning outcome status. While the CSF and its levels of outcomes should not be ignored, they need to be strengthened by teachers who should be guided by the everyday experience of students; teachers should aim to build on students' first hand experiences in real situations. The paper discusses the CSF benchmarks from year 1 to year 6, and provides a number of supermarket investigation learning activities.
History
Journal
Prime number
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pagination
10 - 14
Publisher
Mathematical Association of Victoria
Location
[Parkville, Vic.]
ISSN
0816-9349
Language
eng
Publication classification
C3 Non-refereed articles in a professional journal