Deakin University
Browse

What is the economic and social return on investment for telephone cancer information and support services in Australia? An evaluative social return on investment study protocol

journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-25, 02:44 authored by Nikki McCaffreyNikki McCaffrey, Vicki WhiteVicki White, Lidia Engel, Cathy MihalopoulosCathy Mihalopoulos, Liliana OrellanaLiliana Orellana, Trish LivingstonTrish Livingston, Christine L Paul, Sanchia Aranda, Daswin De Silva, Jessica BucholcJessica Bucholc, Alison HutchinsonAlison Hutchinson, Anna Steiner, Julie Ratcliffe, Katherine Lane, Danielle Spence, Todd Harper, Ann LivingstoneAnn Livingstone, Elizabeth Fradgley, Claire Louise Hutchinson
IntroductionOver 50% of people affected by cancer report unmet support needs. To address unmet information and psychological needs, non-government organisations such as Cancer Councils (Australia) have developed state-based telephone cancer information and support services. Due to competing demands, evidence of the value of these services is needed to ensure that future investment makes the best use of scarce resources. This research aims to determine the costs and broader economic and social value of a telephone support service, to inform future funding and service provision.Methods and analysisA codesigned, evaluative social return on investment analysis (SROI) will be conducted to estimate and compare the costs and monetised benefits of Cancer Council Victoria’s (CCV) telephone support line, 13 11 20, over 1-year and 3-year benefit periods. Nine studies will empirically estimate the parameters to inform the SROI and calculate the ratio (economic and social value to value invested): step 1 mapping outcomes (in-depth analysis of CCV’s 13 11 20 recorded call data; focus groups and interviews); step 2 providing evidence of outcomes (comparative survey of people affected by cancer who do and do not call CCV’s 13 11 20; general public survey); step 3 valuing the outcomes (financial proxies, value games); step 4 establishing the impact (Delphi); step 5 calculating the net benefit and step 6 service improvement (discrete choice experiment (DCE), ‘what if’ analysis). Qualitative (focus groups, interviews) and quantitative studies (natural language processing, cross-sectional studies, Delphi) and economic techniques (willingness-to-pay, financial proxies, value games, DCE) will be applied.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for each of the studies will be sought independently as the project progresses. So far, ethics approval has been granted for the first two studies. As each study analysis is completed, results will be disseminated through presentation, conferences, publications and reports to the partner organisations.

History

Journal

BMJ Open

Volume

14

Pagination

e081425-e081425

Location

England

ISSN

2044-6055

eISSN

2044-6055

Language

eng

Publication classification

C2 Other contribution to refereed journal

Issue

6

Publisher

BMJ