Deakin University
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

What is the point of attempting to make a case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception?

journal contribution
posted on 1999-01-01, 00:00 authored by Boris Crassini, J Broerse, R H Day, C J Best, W A Sparrow
We question the usefulness of Pylyshyn's dichotomy between cognitively penetrable and cognitively impenetrable mechanisms as the basis for his distinction between cognition and early vision. This dichotomy is comparable to others that have been proposed in psychology prompting disputes that by their very nature could not be resolved. This fate is inevitable for Pylyshyn's thesis because of its reliance on internal representations and their interpretation. What is more fruitful in relation to this issue is not a difficult dichotomy, but a different look at perception such as proposed by Gibson (1979).

History

Journal

Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume

22

Issue

3

Pagination

372 - 373

ISSN

0140-525X

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC