This study reexamines the competing claims that probability of informed trading (PIN) is priced in the cross-section of stock returns while adjusted PIN (AdjPIN), the component of PIN related to information asymmetry, is not. We find that behind these seemingly contradicting conclusions is the role of institutional investors, and the pricing of PIN and AdjPIN depends on institutional ownership. Only for those stocks with low institutional ownership are both PIN and AdjPIN priced. Our findings imply that investors require compensation for information risk only from stocks with low institutional ownership.
History
Journal
International review of finance
Volume
15
Pagination
55-88
Location
Chichester, Eng.
ISSN
1369-412X
eISSN
1468-2443
Language
eng
Publication classification
C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal