Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Whose Trojan Horse? The Dynamics of Resistance against International Financial Reporting Standards

journal contribution
posted on 2014-01-01, 00:00 authored by M Gelter, Zehra Gulay Kavame ErogluZehra Gulay Kavame Eroglu
The introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) has been debated in the United States since at least the account-ing scandals of the early 2000s. While publicly traded firms around the world are increasingly switching to IFRS, often because they are required to do so by law or by their stock exchange, the Securities Exchange Com-mission (“SEC”) seems to have become more reticent in recent years. Only foreign issuers have been permitted to use IFRS in the United States since 2007. By contrast, the EU has mandated the use of IFRS in the con-solidated financial statements of publicly traded firms since 2005. In the United States, IFRS, which are promulgated by the London-based Inter-national Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), are often seen as an at-tempt by Europeans to colonize U.S. accounting standard setting, and as an element of a foreign legal system alien to U.S. capital markets and se-curities law. In this article, we suggest that this perception is actually a myth, which we attempt to debunk. In fact, the introduction of IFRS in Europe, particularly Continental Europe, was far from controversial. IFRS were promoted by Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions and strongly support-ed by the United States, particularly when capital markets international-ized in the 1990s. They were—and still are—in many ways at odds with the Continental European accounting cultures of countries such as France and Germany, on whose examples we draw. In spite of the EU mandate for publicly traded firms, accounting law in these jurisdictions has still not fully absorbed IFRS; nevertheless, for now a solution that reconciles traditional and international accounting has been found. In this article, we explore the problems and resistance of IFRS in Continen-tal Europe and seek to draw lessons for the United States. We argue that given the shared heritage of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Princi-ples (“GAAP”) and IFRS as investor-oriented accounting standards, their introduction in the United States should be considerably easier than it was on the other side of the Atlantic.

History

Journal

University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law

Volume

36

Issue

1

Season

Fall

Pagination

89 - 189

Publisher

University of Pennsylvania

Location

Pennsylvania, USA

ISSN

1388-199X

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2014, Brill - Nijhoff

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC