Deakin University
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Why are females ornamented? A test of the courtship stimulation and courtship rejection hypotheses

Version 2 2024-06-13, 09:38
Version 1 2016-10-13, 11:08
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 09:38 authored by R Chan, D Stuart-Fox, TS Jessop
Female ornamentation was initially thought to reflect genetic correlation with the more elaborate male trait. However, this cannot explain female-specific ornamentation, such as the conspicuous coloration displayed by females of many species during breeding. Females may exhibit distinctive, reproductive coloration to 1) advertise receptivity and stimulate male courtship or 2) advertise nonreceptivity when gravid to reduce male courtship, harassment, and potentially costly copulations. We tested both hypotheses in the Lake Eyre dragon lizard (Ctenophorus maculosus) by quantifying female coloration, using spectroradiometry and a model of lizard color perception, and male and female behavior across the female reproductive cycle. Females develop bright orange coloration on their throat and abdomen during the breeding season, whereas males remain cryptically colored. The onset of orange coloration was associated with enlarging follicles, acceptance of copulations, and escalation of male courtship. Rather than fading once females were no longer receptive, however, the intense orange coloration remained until oviposition. Furthermore, despite maximal coloration associated with nonreceptivity, males persisted with courtship and copulation attempts, and females increased rejection behaviors comprising lateral displays and flipping onto their backs (to prevent forced intromission), both of which emphasize the conspicuous ventrolateral coloration. These apparently costly rejection behaviors did not reduce male harassment but did decrease the frequency of potentially costly copulations. These results suggest that 1) males do not determine female receptivity based on coloration alone and 2) the potentially costly rejection behaviors may have evolved to reduce the direct costs of mating.

History

Journal

Behavioral ecology

Volume

20

Article number

6

Pagination

1334-1342

Location

Oxford, Eng.

ISSN

1045-2249

eISSN

1465-7279

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2009, Oxford University Press

Issue

6

Publisher

Oxford University Press