Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Yes to recreational drugs and complementary medicines but no to life-Saving medications: beliefs underpinning treatment decisions among PLHIV

journal contribution
posted on 2019-12-01, 00:00 authored by Amary Mey, David Plummer, Gary RogersGary Rogers, Maree O’Sullivan, Amber Domberelli, Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie
Despite the life-preserving benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART), some people living with HIV (PLHIV) delay, decline or diverge from recommended treatment while paradoxically being willing to use potentially dangerous substances, such as recreational drugs (RD) and complementary medicines (CM). During 2016 and 2017, interviews were conducted with 40 PLHIV, in Australia to understand drivers underpinning treatment decisions. While many believed ART to be effective, they expressed concerns about long-term effects, frustration over perceived lack of autonomy in treatment decisions and financial, emotional and physical burdens of HIV care. In contrast, they ascribed a sense of self-control over the use of RD and CM, along with multiple professed benefits. The perceived burden of ART emerged as a motivator for deviating from recommended treatment, while positive views towards RD and CM appear to justify use. This study may serve as guidance for the development of future strategies to address barriers to treatment uptake and adherence and subsequently health outcomes for PLHIV in Australia and elsewhere.

History

Journal

AIDS and Behavior

Volume

23

Pagination

3396-3410

Location

New York, N.Y.

ISSN

1090-7165

eISSN

1573-3254

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2019, Springer Science+Business Media

Issue

12

Publisher

Springer New York