File(s) under permanent embargo
Young people, everyday civic life and the limits of social cohesion
In recent times, many Western governments have shifted focus from multiculturalism to
social cohesion in their efforts to address the impact of increased cultural diversity within
communities. One of the many and complex triggers for this change has been concern
about the marginalisation of young people of minority backgrounds from mainstream
culture, in turn prompted by acts of civil unrest, violence, and even terrorism by youth.
In this article I focus not so much on why the social cohesion ideal of integration is
problematic for young people (although it clearly is), but on the implicit assumptions
about what constitutes good participation in community that underlie any cohesiondriven
emphasis on integration into civic life in the first place. In doing so, I consider how
many young Australians’ modes of imagining, forging, and engaging in community,
which are very much a product of growing up in times of super-diversity, globalisation,
and individualisation, sit uneasily with mainstream communitarian notions of civic life
that are founded on twentieth-century forms of community and participation that are no
longer evident or sustainable in contemporary societies. I suggest that a social cohesion
agenda may not adequately account for the particular circumstances and experiences of
young people because of its assumptions about community and civic engagement that
take both adult and modern life as its reference points.
social cohesion in their efforts to address the impact of increased cultural diversity within
communities. One of the many and complex triggers for this change has been concern
about the marginalisation of young people of minority backgrounds from mainstream
culture, in turn prompted by acts of civil unrest, violence, and even terrorism by youth.
In this article I focus not so much on why the social cohesion ideal of integration is
problematic for young people (although it clearly is), but on the implicit assumptions
about what constitutes good participation in community that underlie any cohesiondriven
emphasis on integration into civic life in the first place. In doing so, I consider how
many young Australians’ modes of imagining, forging, and engaging in community,
which are very much a product of growing up in times of super-diversity, globalisation,
and individualisation, sit uneasily with mainstream communitarian notions of civic life
that are founded on twentieth-century forms of community and participation that are no
longer evident or sustainable in contemporary societies. I suggest that a social cohesion
agenda may not adequately account for the particular circumstances and experiences of
young people because of its assumptions about community and civic engagement that
take both adult and modern life as its reference points.
History
Journal
Journal of intercultural studiesVolume
31Issue
5Pagination
573 - 589Publisher
RoutledgeLocation
Abingdon, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0725-6868eISSN
1469-9540Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2010, Taylor & FrancisUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC