course bidding at business schools
Mechanisms that rely on course bidding are widely used at business schools in order to allocate seats at oversubscribed courses. Bids play two key roles under these mechanisms: to infer student preferences and to determine who have bigger claims on course seats. We show that these two roles may easily conflict, and preferences induced from bids may significantly differ from the true preferences. Therefore, these mechanisms, which are promoted as market mechanisms, do not necessarily yield market outcomes. We introduce a Pareto-dominant market mechanism that can be implemented by asking students for their preferences in addition to their bids over courses. © (2010) by the Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association.
History
Journal
International Economic ReviewVolume
51Pagination
99-123Location
London, Eng.ISSN
0020-6598eISSN
1468-2354Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal articleCopyright notice
2010, Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research AssociationIssue
1Publisher
WileyUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC