Deakin University
Browse

geographic differences in subjective well-being among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian adolescents and adults

Version 2 2024-06-04, 00:02
Version 1 2017-01-01, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 00:02 authored by AJ Tomyn, David MellorDavid Mellor, Matthew Fuller-TyszkiewiczMatthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Robert CumminsRobert Cummins, R Tanton
Published data that describe the subjective well‐being (SWB) of Indigenous people across Australia are scarce. This study reports differences in the SWB of 3 sample groups–mainstream Australian adults, Indigenous adolescents, and non‐Indigenous adolescents–in 5 geographic areas classified by remoteness. Both groups of adolescents were participating in a national program for disengaged youth. Consistent with results from general population samples, the SWB for people living in rural centers was higher than for those in either major cities or very remote areas. This suggests that there may be an optimum size of community that acts as a buffer to the well‐being of both Indigenous and non‐Indigenous adolescents and adults. This may be achieved through greater community connection, as well as having a reasonable level of amenities available. The results of this study are likely relevant to Indigenous populations in other countries, and the implications of these findings for service delivery are discussed.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.

Location

Chichester, Eng.

Indigenous content

This research output may contain the names and images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people now deceased. We apologise for any distress that may occur.

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2016, Wiley-Blackwell

Journal

Journal of community psychology

Volume

45

Pagination

81-99

ISSN

0090-4392

eISSN

1520-6629

Issue

1

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell