Deakin University
Browse

An analysis of firm and market volatility

Version 2 2024-06-03, 14:57
Version 1 2018-03-19, 14:38
report
posted on 2011-01-01, 00:00 authored by Susan Sharma, Paresh Narayan, Xinwei ZhengXinwei Zheng
In this paper, using time series data for the period 2 January 1998 to 31 December 2008, for 560 firms listed on the NYSE, we examine whether firm volatility is related to market volatility. The main contribution of this paper is that we develop the analytical framework motivating the firm-market volatility relationship. We unravel three new findings on volatility. First, we discover significant evidence of common volatility; for 12 out of 14 sectors, market volatility has a statistically significant effect on firm volatility for at least 50 percent of firms. Second, we discover significant evidence of size effects: for small sized firms, there is weak evidence of commonality in volatility, while for large sized firms there is high evidence (as much as 75 percent of firms) of commonality in volatility. Third, we find that market volatility predicts firm volatility for firms belonging to five of the 14 sectors.

History

Series

School Working Paper - Financial Econometrics Series ; SWP 2011/02

Pagination

1 - 43

Publisher

Deakin University, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance

Place of publication

Geelong, Vic.

Language

eng

Notes

School working paper (Deakin University. School of Accounting, Economics and Finance) ; 2011/02 In this paper, using time series data for the period 2 January 1998 to 31 December 2008, for 560 firms listed on the NYSE, we examine whether firm volatility is related to market volatility. The main contribution of this paper is that we develop the analytical framework motivating the firm-market volatility relationship. We unravel three new findings on volatility. First, we discover significant evidence of common volatility; for 12 out of 14 sectors, market volatility has a statistically significant effect on firm volatility for at least 50 percent of firms. Second, we discover significant evidence of size effects: for small sized firms, there is weak evidence of commonality in volatility, while for large sized firms there is high evidence (as much as 75 percent of firms) of commonality in volatility. Third, we find that market volatility predicts firm volatility for firms belonging to five of the 14 sectors.

Publication classification

CN.1 Other journal article; C Journal article

Copyright notice

2011, The Authors

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC