The value of accurate weather forecast information is substantial. In this paper we examine competition among forecast providers and its implications for the quality of forecasts. A simple
economic model shows that an economic bias geographical inequality in forecast accuracy arises
due to the extent of the market. Using the unique data on daily high temperature forecasts for
704 U.S. cities, we find that forecast accuracy increases with population and income. Furthermore,
the economic bias gets larger when the day of forecasting is closer to the target day; i.e. when
people are more concerned about the quality of forecasts. The results hold even after we control
for location-specific heterogeneity and difficulty of forecasting.
History
Pagination
1-22
Language
eng
Publication classification
CN.1 Other journal article
Publisher
Deakin University, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance
Place of publication
Geelong, Vic.
Series
School Working Paper - Economics Series ; SWP 2008/12