Deakin University
Browse

Publication bias in minimum-wage research? Card and Krueger redux

Version 2 2024-06-03, 11:07
Version 1 2018-03-07, 16:39
report
posted on 2024-06-03, 11:07 authored by TD Stanley, Chris DoucouliagosChris Doucouliagos
Card and Krueger?s (1995) meta-analysis of the employment effects of minimum wages challenged existing theory. Unfortunately, their meta-analysis confused publication bias with the absence of a genuine empirical effect. Recently developed meta-analysis methods corroborate that Card and Krueger?s findings were nevertheless correct. The minimum wage effects literature is contaminated by publication bias. Once this publication bias is corrected, no time-series evidence of a negative association between minimum wages and employment remains.

History

Pagination

1-19

Language

eng

Notes

School working paper (Deakin University. School of Accounting, Economics and Finance) ; 2006/16 Card and Krueger?s (1995) meta-analysis of the employment effects of minimum wages challenged existing theory. Unfortunately, their meta-analysis confused publication bias with the absence of a genuine empirical effect. Recently developed meta-analysis methods corroborate that Card and Krueger?s findings were nevertheless correct. The minimum wage effects literature is contaminated by publication bias. Once this publication bias is corrected, no time-series evidence of a negative association between minimum wages and employment remains.

Publication classification

CN.1 Other journal article

Copyright notice

2006, The Authors

Publisher

Deakin University, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance

Place of publication

Geelong, Vic.

Series

School Working Paper - Economic Series ; SWP 2006/16

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC