D ■

■ sa

A General Account

OP THE

BELONGING TO THE FA/AILY

• » By > •

WALTER W. FROG GATT,

Entomologist,

Now South Wales.

SYDNEY: ¿y/j?.

William Applegate Gullick, Government Printer.

1909.


§ 48531

J


FRUIT FLIES.

A GENERAL ACCOUNT

OF THE

FLIES

BELONGING TO THE FAMILY

7 R YPE TIDAi.

3Y

WALTER W. FROGGATT,

Entomologist,

New South Wales.

SYDNEY ' vV. A. GULLICK, GOVERNMENT PRINTER.

1909.


§ 48531 a

<2o t JO S?

FRUIT FLIES.

A General Account of the Flies beloijgiijg to the Family Trypetidce, tljat damage souijd fruit.

WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THE DIFFERENT SPECIES (SOME DESCRIBED AS NEW), AND THEIR HABITS, RANGE, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR DESTROYING THEM.

WALTER W. FROGGATT,

Entomologist.

The group of insects known as “Fruit Flies,” though so much before the public at present, need some definition, for it is a common thing for the oichaidis't to assume that any small fly hovering round damaged or rotting fiuit is the fruit-fly and any maggot in the mass to be the destructive fruit-fly maggot. In a great many cases the latter are species that have no connection with the true pests, that never damage sound fruit, and are simply attracted by the decaying matter, and really act as scavengers. The fi uit-ilies are a well-defined group of the order Diptera (two-winged flies), and belong to the family Trypetidce.

This family comprises a large number of rather small flies, usually with mottled or banded wings; they are remarkable for their curious habits in the larval state in producing galls upon plants, or in mining in the tissue of the stems, leaves, or flowers of different plants, or in the flesh of ripening fiuit. The females, with their needle-like ovipositors, puncture the plant and deposit the eggs beneath in the tissue.

In Australia we have a number of indigenous species that form galls; but the group that we are dealing with here are those that have the habit of depositing their eggs in the fruit of wild or cultivated plants, and comprise some of the most serious pests that the orchardist and gardener have to fight against. Some of these are cosmopolitan and are found in many countries, while others are restricted in their range; but whenever a species attacks cultivated fruit it can very easily be introduced into a new country, either in the larval (maggot) or pupal (chrysalis) stage.

Eggs deposited in fruit may be transported in apparently sound fruit and on transit may develop days afterwards, or the more or less developed maggots may reach maturity, crawl out of the fruit, and pupate in a crevice in the case or among the packing, and then after the contents of the case have been destroyed it may develop, emerge as a perfect fly capable of doing untold damage. There are records proving that the pupre have been found in the soil round the roots of imported plants that have been grown in infested districts.

The destructive species of the family Trypetidcu have been described by many entomologists, and are comprised in about half a dozen genera. In the north-eastern States of North America there are two common orchard pests which, originally placed in the genus Trypeta, have, after closer examination, been placed in the genus Ragoletis, a group of small flies with four bristles on the scutellum and black cross bands on the wings. The apple maggot (Ragoletis pomonella), a native of North America, where it fed upon haw and crab apples growing in the forests, is often a very serious apple pest in New York State. When I was at Cornell University, Ithaca, in the early part of October, the apples growing on the College campus were full of maggots. A second species (R. cerasi, “The Cherry Fruit Fly ’) has a similar range in the United States, sometimes causing considerable damage in the cherry orchards. One or two species are also found in Europe. The genus Trypeta contains a number of gall-producing species, but there are also several that have turned their attention to fruit in this genus, of which Trypeta ludens, the “orange fly” of Mexico, is a typical example.

The Mediterranean fruit-fly is placed in the genus Ceratitis, and represents a world-wide pest. A number of allied species have been described from southern Africa and Mauritius.

Some species have been described and placed in other genera, which, after ■closer examination by specialists, may be found to belong to some of the above typical groups.

The maggots of the typical species of Trypetidce that infest fruit are so much alike in general form and structure that a general description of one species will define them all. There are a few minor points of difference known to the entomologist, such as the shape, number, and situation of the spiracles that are placed on the last segment and surrounded with a rosette-like process.

The maggots vary in colour (according to their food) from semitransparent white to yellow of all shades to pink and red, and the average length of a full-grown one is \ an inch in length. They can be best described as rather slender, naked, cylindrical grubs, tapering from the broader truncate anal segment to the front of the head (or cephalic segment), which comes to a. blunt tip, and contains a pair of black, hard, retractile hooklets 01

jaws. With the aid of these jaws and with the power of contracting the segments of the body, they can move quickly through the damaged tissue of the fruit, which they tear with these curved jaws ; and also, when full grown, can work their way into the soil when they leave the fruit to pupate, and so are very soon out of sight if placed on loose soil. They also have the power, particularly if placed on a smooth surface, of curving the ends of the body round and springing up a considerable height—like the jumper” maggots in cheese.

They all feed in the same manner, commencing as soon as they hatch from the eggs, to feed upon the surrounding tissue ; and in ripe fruit the infested area soon spreads and forms a putrid mass extending to the centre, when the fruit falls to the ground. I do not think that the maggots drop from the hanging fruit, except on rare occasions; but as many of the maggots are not fully developed when the fruit falls, they remain until fully fed before they crawl into the soil beneath.

Their action upon this tissue of different fruits is characteristic, for while in the orange, peach, and soft ripening fruits it all becomes a putrid mass,, in unripe peaches it is more a network of damaged tissue in the early stages, and where apples and pears are attacked their mining becomes a series of galleries or small chambers before the final decay.

This is so noticeable in the work of the apple maggot in America (.Ragoletis jpomonella) that it is often called the railroad maggot.” When full grown the maggots crawl out through the underside of the fruit, and thus resting on the soil they work their way downward to a depth of \ to. sometimes 2 inches if the soil is very loose, but usually more will be found less than an inch under the remains of the fruit.

They do not take long to transform from the soft maggot to the oval hard pupa, the outer skin of the maggot changing into a stout shell-like case of yellow or reddish-brown tint. Enclosed in this protective covering, the final transformation to the perfect fly takes place. Then, when ready to emerge, it bursts the front of the shell off and works its way up to the surface of the soil, a perfect fruit-fly.

The habits and life histories of several species have been closely studied by many entomologists during the last twenty years, so that we know the conditions under which we have to work against them. Under ordinary conditions an immense number of eggs never hatch out through want of heat in the early part of winter, and the action of the fly in ovipositing only causes a dull-coloured spot to appear on the skin of the orange, the “sting mark ” of the orchardist. In the maggot stage many get exposed and killed, and there must be also a very large percentage of perfect flies that after they emerge from the pupse cases never reach the surface. We know

that in the dry hot seasons fruit-flies are always worse, while after a very wet winter they are never so plentiful. The obvious reason is, that when the orchard soil is sodden and beaten down by rain storms it becomes so hard and caked that any flies from deeply-buried pupse have a very small chance of getting through to the surface.

In all countries where irrigation is carried out in a systematic manner and the ground flooded in basins round the trees at regular intervals, though the fruit-fly is a well known pest, it comes and goes, and is not constantly in evidence as in Australia and Africa, where conditions are so different. In southern Spain and Sicily this is one of the great factors in the checks upon the increase of fruit-flies.

Among all the pests that have turned their attention to cultivated fruit there is no group so well protected from natural enemies as the fruit-flies. From the time they emerge from the eggs to the time they burrow beneath the fruit into the soil they are feeding and working beyond the reach of many parasites, predaceous insects, and birds that would otherwise feed upon them. Free to a great extent from enemies that reduce the number of other insects, they are also safe from all sprays and contact poisons while doing the damage; sprays will not kill them, and fumigation with gas, so deadly to scale insects, will not affect them. We have, therefore, to resort to different methods in dealing with them. We must either destroy, drive away, or capture the perfect flies before they can lay their eggs, or else destroy the infested fruit containing the eggs and maggots. In every country where action has been taken by the Government to protect the gardener and orchardist against himself or his careless neighbours, this has been recognised, and Fruit-fly Destruction Acts have come into force, in which the main principle has been the inspection of orchards, and the compulsory cleaning-up and destruction of all infested fruit. In Mexico the Department of Fomento obtained a grant of money to be expended in the fruit-fly infested orange orchards of Morelos. The Commission of Parasi-tologia Agricola, in whose hands the work was placed, formulated the following rules

(1)    Gather each day all mangoes, lemons, and oranges which may have

fallen from the trees, and deposit them in a clean corner of the orchard.

(2)    Destroy all fruit so accumulated at least once a week.

(3)    It is preferable to destroy the fruit by burning, but it may be

disposed of by burial, and when buried it should be covered with at least fifty centimetres (about 20 inches) of soil.

(4)    If the same worm exists in the guava, this fruit should also be

destroyed in the same manner.

I have described in my second Progress Report how I saw this work carried out in Mexico by the inspectors at Yutapec.

The only parasite that has been found attacking this fruit-fly is a small red braconid wasp, with a black head and dark-coloured wings, named Cratosipila rudibunda. Isaacs states in his report (1905): “The parasite has not as yet done any effective work on the Trypeta ludens, as investigations have shown that not over 10 to 15 per cent, of the maggots are parasitised. Every effort is being made to encourage the propagation of the parasite, and great hopes are entertained that it may yet overtake the plague and keep it in check.”

Koebele, who gave me specimens of this parasite he had bred from mangoes obtained in the Mexican markets, told me he had never bred it from infested oranges. Professor A. L. Herrera, the Chief of the Entomological Staff at Mexico City, informed me that the parasites had made no difference to the pest up to the time of my visit (October, 1907).

In consequence of the presence of this fly in Mexican orchards, the State Board of Horticulture prohibited the importation of Mexican oranges into the State, and the railways running between the two States refused them as freight. Mr. Craw caused all cars used for transportation of Mexican oranges to be disinfected with steam before they could be again used in California.

In Bermuda an Act on very similar lines came into law only last year, and has, according to Mr. Harris, already made a marked difference in the numbers and damage caused by their fruit-fly pest.

There are no special laws in the southern oountries of Europe and northern Africa against fruit-flies, but in all countries where these pests are known, all the entomologists have urged the orchardists to destroy as much as they can of the infested fruit.

In the Turkish village of Lefka, in Cyprus, where a large quantity of oranges are grown, I found no traces of fruit-flies, probably because every fallen fruit was eaten clean out of the skin by rats.

Besides the destruction of the maggots in the fruit, we can also destroy many of the adult flies, on account of their liking for certain oils. It was discovered about two years ago in Western Australia that if a dish containing kerosene was placed out in an orchard, the Mediterranean fruit-fly was attracted by the scent and flew into the oil. This was confirmed when suitable tins were placed among infested trees, for thousands were taken in a few days ; and wherever tried it has had the same effect upon this species This oil, however, had no charms for the Queensland fruit-fly when it was tried in Queensland. While experimenting in the orchards of India, where a species closely allied to the Queensland fly was very abundant, Mr. Howlett

discovered that citronella oil spread on some leaves, on a stone, or smeared upon a handkerchief, attracted this and an allied species, but had no attractions for a third larger species that destroyed the melons and gourds. I took a thousand specimens of this fruit-fly (Dctcus ferrugineus) with half-a-dozen sweeps of my net over some leaves upon which we had placed oil the previous evening. One remarkable thing was that when we came to examine them we found that all the specimens were males. Further experiments right through the season should prove whether this is always the case ; but even so, the destruction of all the males would soon lead to infertile females. If other oil can be found to attract other species, they can be mixed with poison or used in traps, and will become a very effective aid in controlling the pest.

The Olive Fly (Dacus olece) is one of the most serious insect pests in the world at the present time, for last year it destroyed so large a percentage of the olive crop that it was estimated that the loss in olive oil due to the damage by the olive fly totalled ¿£1,000,000. In dealing with this pest, a very large reward is offered by the Italian Government for any remedy or method to check the pest.

Professor Berlese, the celebrated Italian zoologist, stationed at Florence, has experimented with a sweet poisoned spray, consisting of honey, treacle, arsenic, and water. The formula is—

Mellasa (in English, molasses) ... ..

. ... 40

Miele (honey) ... ... ... ..

. ... 40

Arsenate of potassi... ... ... ..

. ... 2

Aqua (water) ... ... ... ..

. ... 18


The spraying of the trees was very successful in the experiments carried out except that it was very easily washed off, and also that in some instances a number of bees were killed.

The Professor is now experimenting with a similar mixture placed in small bottles hung up on the branches of the trees. Into each bottle is inserted several long cotton threads, forming loose bundles hanging several feet, down which the poisoned liquid flows, and the flies find a ready resting-place while they sip the poison.

I have written to Professor Berlese, and asked him to try the addition of citronella oil to his poisoned mixture, which he calls Dacacide, and to let me know whether it attracts the olive fly. His assistant informed me, when at his laboratories in Florence, that the majority of the flies killed with Dacacide were males.

In South Africa, where fruit-flies are probably as bad as any place in the world, fine netting was used to protect the fruit on the trees from the flies, but it was so expensive on a large scale that its use was not extended, and it was only when there was a very valuable crop that it paid.

Where the orchard is kept in good condition, domestic poultry, particularly hens which have the scratching habit highly developed, no doubt, if given the run of the orchard, will unearth a lot of pupae and destroy many in al stages of growth.

Family— Trypetidcc.

All the members of the true fruit-flies are placed in this family of the Diptera, and are classified by most authorities as a division or group known as the Muscidce, which it is not necessary to define here.

Williston in his “North American Diptera” (second edition), 1896, gives the following definition :—    .

“ Head hemispherical; face nearly perpendicular in profile, or somewhat retreating, without distinct vibrissse ; front broad, bristly on the sides, the lower fronto-orbital bristles situated close to the border of the eyes; antennae decumbent, short, rarely elongated; abdomen, composed of four or five segments ; genitalia of the males but little exposed; the ovipositor jointed, more or less projecting ; wings rather large; auxiliary vein present, ending steeply and obscurely in or near the border ; posterior basal cell and the anal cell distinct, the latter often drawn out into an acute, often prolonged, point; wings usually with dark markings; legs moderately long; tibiae without preapical bristle; proboscis'moderately long, usually with broad labella, sometimes long, and the narrow labella folding backward.”

The family contains a number of small flies, many of which have curiously mottled wings. Some of them produce galls upon plants ; the larvae of others mine in the plant tissue without producing galls ; and many are very destructive pests to fruit. They are well represented in Australia by a number of indigenous species, some of which produce galls, such as Tephritis, sp., which forms large galls upon the twigs of the Snow Bush (Aster ramulosa), and the fruit-damaging species by Dacus Try on i, a serious pest to citrus fruits and bananas.

There are a number of different genera in this family that include fruit-flies. The genus Dacus contains a great number of destructive species.

The genus Ceratitis, though limited in number of species, comprises several very destructive species, and in the genus Try pel a two species are known to attack sound fruit. The genus Carpomyia contains the Baluchiston Melon Fly, which appears to come very close to the genus Ceratitis. The genus Anasirepha, founded by Schiner (“ Reise der Novara Zool. Diptera,” 262, 1868) for the reception of two South American flies, Anastrepha munda and A. striata, now includes others that were originally described in the genus Dacus, the common fruit-pest of Brazil. “The Bahia Fruit Fly,’’ Anastrepha

fratercula, was named Dacus fraterculus by Wiedemann. Another common fruit-pest in the same country, A. serpentina, was also first known as Dacus serpentinus.

Bigot placed one of the commonest Indian fruit-flies in the genus Rivellia. It was found infesting peaches, so he called it i?. persicce. It is a Dacus, and I have returned it to that genus in my notes.

Other species that have been described in the genus Dasyneura are now placed in the genus Dacus. The generic name Dasyneura having been used by Rondani in 1840 for a group of the Cecidomyia (gall gnats), Saunders’ genus created in 1841 will have to drop out of the Trypetidce. The “apple maggot ” of the United Slates, once known as Trypeta pomonella, has now been placed in the genus Ithayoletes, and the allied species Ortulis cerasi, attacking cherries, has come under the same group.

Genus—Dacus.

(Meigen System Beuchr. VI, 22, 1, 1830. Syn. Jlnsca, Fabr. Rossi.

Oscinis, Latr. Fabr., Brachyopa, Meig.)

The members of this genus are all rather small reddish-brown flies, sometimes marked with black on the dorsal surface, and in most cases marked with pale or bright yellow nude areas on the shoulders, sides of the thorax, or forming regular stripes or lines on the dorsal surface of the thorax. The scutellum is also often yellow, prominent, usually smooth and shining. The wings are hyaline, often striped or clouded with brown, or blackish. They are active little flies ; the shape of the abdomen, narrow and constricted at its junction with the thorax, giving them a wasp-like appearance. When running about over the fruit or foliage, they often carry their wings in a very characteristic manner, drooping down on the sides of the body. They all have the same habit of puncturing ripening fruit, and depositing their eggs beneath the skin of the fruit, the maggots feeding upon the tissue.

These maggots are elongate cylindrical grubs, and pupate in the soil upon which the damaged fruit falls,

The members of this genus have a very wide range through Africa, India, the Malay Archipelago, Australia, and some of the Pacific Islands; a few have been described from South America ; and one, the olive fl}, has a wide range over the Mediterranean region of southern Europe.

PLATE I.


QUEENSLAND FRUIT-FLY.

Dacus Tryoni.


The Queensland Fruit Fly,

(PI. I and PI. IV, fig. 1.)

Dacus Tryoni, Froggatt.

(Tephrites Tryoni, Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales, June, 189/, p. 410, pi. VIII, fig. 1. Miscellaneous publications, No. 163, 1897, Dep. Agriculture N.S.W. (reprint). Ayr. Gaz. N. S. W., June, 1899, Reprint Mise. Pub. 303, Dep. Agr.)

Though the maggot of this fruit-fly had been known for many years in Queensland and New South Wales (it is stated as far back as 1852) as a pest to fruit-growers, it was not identified until Tryon published his admirable observations on economic entomology (“ Report on Insect and Fungus Pests, No. 1, 1889,’’ for the Queensland Government). He identified it as the larva of a dipterous insect of the family Trypetidse and though he did not give it a specific name, placed it in the genus Tephritis, under which genus I placed it when giving it specific rank under the name of Tephritis Tryoni, in recognition of Mr. Tryon’s valuable investigations into its life-history and habits, contained in the above report. At this time in southern Queensland it was recognised more as 'a peach and nectarine pest from a commercial point of view, though it had been bred from nearly every kind of fruit except grapes and passion-fruit.

Since Tryon wrote, this fruit-fly has become a very much more serious pest, probably partly from the extension, particularly of banana orchards, into the northern parts of his State, and also from the growth of the interstate fruit export trade. During the last ten years the interstate export and import fruit regulations and Vegetation Diseases Acts have come into force, and much more attention has been called to this fruit pest from the natural anxiety of the southern States to keep it out of their orchards and to protect their fruit-growers.

From observations extending over a number of years, it seems fairly evident that the natural or permanent southern limit of the Queensland fruit-fly is about Gosford, in the rich brushes that extend within 50 miles of Sydney. We often get this species much nearer Sydney, but it is an accidental or isolated case of infestation that can be readily traced; and unlike the more cosmopolitan Mediterranean fruit-fly, I do not think that Dacus Tryoni will ever thrive and become a fruit-pest south of Sydney. In all the years that bananas have been imported (for years without any restrictions), it has had every chance of getting all over Tasmania, Victoria, and South Australia, but it has never taken hold of any district south of Sydney.

A great number of general reports have been written and compiled by our economic entomologists on this species, but no fresh conclusions have been arrived at regarding the best means of checking its ravages. Though several hymenopterous parasites have been bred from the pupm, they have no effect upon the increase of the pest on account of their rarity, and can only be regarded as interesting from an entomological point of view.

Description : Length, 3 lines ; expanse of wings, 5 to 6 lines. The perfect fly has clear transparent wings, clouded very slightly, clouded along the costal nervure, and a tine tranverse fuscous stripe crosses the wing towards the base ; the nervures reddish. The abdomen, constricted at the base, is broadly rounded to the tip, furnished with a fine ovipositor in the female, while that of the male is more elongated, so that the female is more wasp like in form than the male.

In general coloi’ation they are somewhat variable, but on careful examination the yellow markings will be found constant ; but this has led to some confusion in determining the species, when they have been bred from uncommon fruits or vegetables. Head : The eyes almost black ; face, with l’ounded black spot on either side below the antennie ; tips of antennre fuscous, and a few indistinct spots or marks on the forehead ; thorax, with a broad creamy often pale dorsal band, running down to the scutellum, with a short, well-defined narrow pale yellow stripe on either side. On the sides of the thorax there is a small, rounded, creamy white spot in front, with a blotch formed of two pares of the same colour in a line with the front of the parallel side stripe; the scutellum, white to pale yellow, is prominent, somewhat convex on the upper surface, broadly angulated behind, with two stout bristles. The legs are pale yellow, tarsi darkest; abdomen, blackish to brown, with a broad transverse band of pale dull yellow across the basal half. The bristles on the antennse are long, with fine scattered bristles on the head and sides of the thorax, and the abdomen finely pubescent.

It is, in the first place, a typical orange fly, then a banana pest; but there are few fruits that it has not been bred from at some time or other. It is closely allied to the Indian Mango Fly, Dacus ferrugineus, described by Fabricius, and ranges from India and Ceylon to Java and Amboina. Though commonly a mango pest, it attacks and destroys many fruits.

In the Journal of Agriculture, Victoria, May, 1907, French published an article entitled “ Fruit Flies,” afterwards issued as Bulletin 26 of the Department of Agriculture, Victoria. In this paper he describes a variety of D. Trgoni under a varietal name of Dacus cucumis, the maggots of which were obtained in large quantities from cucumbers imported from Queensland. I have carefully compared specimens kindly given to me by Mr. French, and others that we have bred from cucumbers that were sent from Coonamble,

New South Wales, and consider it may rank as a species. There are no differences in the wings, but the whole insect is of a much lighter colour, and has a well-defined short, broad, pale yellow blotch or stripe in the centre of the lower half of the dorsal surface of the thorax, while the side stripes of ellow on either side are shorter, broader, and more curved.

There is, apparently, another variety, if not a distinct species, that breeds in tomatoes grown in Queensland.

Another variety, also found breeding in tomatoes from Queensland, has two well-defined blackish parallel lines dowji the sides of the dorsal surface of the thorax, which run into each other behind the head, with the silvery pubescence enclosed between them.

At the same time, I have typical specimens of the Queensland fruit-fly without the central yellow blotch, also bred from tomatoes.

Probably other members of this genus will be found in the northern portion of Australia, when carefully looked for, as the genus has a wide x’ange.

The Mango Fruit Fly.

(PI. V, fig. 8.)

Dacus ferrugineus, Fabricius.

(Ent. Syst. IV, 342, 127 ; Fab. Syst. Anti., 274-5; Wiedemann, Aussereuropaische Zweiflügelige Insecten, 1828-30, Vol. II, p. 515 ; Macquart, Dipteres Exotiques, nouveaux ou peu connus, 1838, Supp., 3, 64, and 4, 2.)

Doleschall described this species under two different names ; first as Bactrocera macuhpennis, in the Natuurk Tijdschr van Nederl, Indie, vol. X, 1856, p. 36, and figured it on plate 1. In the same journal, two years later, he described a variety under the name of Bactrocera conformis. Van der Wulp notices this in the Annales de la Société Entom. de Belgique, in 1884, in a paper entitled “ Quelques Diptires Exotiques.”

In “ Indian Museum Notes,” vol. III, 1896, in a contribution called “Miscellaneous Notes,” E. C. Cotes figures and describes this fly as a mango pest in India ; and though he states that specimens sent to the British Museum had been identified as Dacus ferrugineus, Fab., he calls it var. mangifera, Cotes, under which name are specimens now in the Calcutta Museum.

Originally described from Java and Amboina, it probably has a wide range, and is certainly one of the commonest species in India and Ceylon. If my determination is right, it is in regards to coloration and size a very variable species, running from black in the thorax, and even the body, to reddish-brown. This is one of the two species that is attracted by the scent of citronella oil, the other being Dacus diversus.

It is a general fruit pest, breeding from mangoes, oranges, and other fruits ; but they were not obtained from any of the Cucurbitae, nor were they bred from the infested peaches in the Government orchard at Pusa. This is a smaller reddish fly, which agrees with Bigot’s description of Dacus persicce.

Dacus ferrugineus is a medium sized species, measuring from 7 to 5 mm. ; it is of a general rusty red colour, with the dorsal surface of the thorax varying from black to a uniform rusty red tint; sometimes the abdomen is marked with almost black bands. It has the shoulders, blotches on the sides, and two lateral stripes on the dorsal surface of the thorax of pale, but often bright yellow; and the scutellum is also of the same colour. The wings are hyaline, with reddish nervures, and the only marking upon them are a reddish stripe along the latter half of the costal nervure, a very faint mark of fuscous at the extreme tip of the wing, and a blotch along the anal cell. The legs of the female are blotched with brown; those of the males lighter. The abdomen has a narrow and then a much wider transverse band round the basal half of the body, with a narrow dark parallel stripe down the centre of the apical half, with either side darkly blotched ; the tip ferruginous. In the darkest varieties the central bar does not show, as the whole of the lower portion of the abdomen is dark reddish-brown to almost black.

There is a specimen in the Verrall Collection, determined by Bigot as this species, from Java.

Maxwell-Lefroy has figured this fly in his “ Important Insects injurious to Indian Agriculture” (page 227, vol. I, No. 2, 1907).

The Peach Fruit Fly.

(PI. V, fig. 5.)

Dacus persicce, Bigot.

(Rivellia persicce, Bigot, Indian Museum Notes, Vol. I, p. 192, 1889. E. C.

Cotes, l.c., p. 195.)

“The fly here described certainly belongs to the family Ortalidae, by the neuration of the wings. It seems to me identical with the genus Rivellia, Desv., following the classification of Rondani (Bull, del Soc. Entom. Italia, Firenze, 1869); and it ought to be included in the large genus Dacus of Fabricius (Macquart, Dipt, de Europe et exotique).

u The specimens examined and were damaged, and in such bad

condition that their description may not be quite exact. As this species appears to me to be new, I propose for it the name of Rivellia persicce.

“ Male and female. Length, 7 mm., the ovipositor projecting.

“ Antennm dull yellow, with tiie extremities blackish ; palpi pale yellow • head and face reddish ; angles of the sides blackish, with two light lines on the inner margin of the eyes ; clypeus reddish, with two large, longitudinal bands, somewhat indistinct, with a greyish-brown pubescence ; shoulders, two narrow lateral lines, pale yellow; scutellum greyish-yellow. Abdomen reddish, with a narrow dorsal line, black, indistinct anteriorly; ovipositor depressed, angular at the extremity, yellowish, the rest of a light yellow to dark brown ; legs yellow ; the posterior tibia brownish at the base and extremities; tarsi white ; wings hyaline, the longitudinal nervures clouded with yellow at the base j stigma pale yellow. The wing is marked with a a small, blackish patch, situated at the extremity between the costal nervure and the third longitudinal nervure (of Ptondani).”

The above is a translation of Bigot’s description of the fruit-fly which was sent to him from Chota-Nagpur, India, by E. C. Cotes, the Director of the Calcutta Museum. They were bred from maggots that were very destructive to peaches grown in that district, from which habit Bigot gave it the specific name persicce.

Mr. Irvine, who collected the specimens, sent some interesting notes. He says : “ To stop the injury or ameliorate the harm done, I intend trying the effect of removing at least 6 inches of the soil from under the trees during the cold weather, and thoroughly baking the same, which must kill all there is in the soil of insect life. I would further recommend the instant removal of all pierced fruits which fall to the ground, and the burning of the same, or else placing them in a trough of water for at least twenty-four hours.

“ Whether the millions of larva? that have pupated in the soil during the peach-crop season, when hundreds of decaying fruit fell to the ground, have since taken wing, or remain to hibernate in the soil till next season’s crop, is a problem to solve.”

When working in conjunction with Mr. Howlett I obtained many specimens of this species on the wing among the melon patches at Pusa, near the Imperial Research Laboratories ; and this was one of the two species that was attracted, both there and at Bangalore, by the scent of the citronella oil. In the peach orchard attached to the station at Pusa nearly every peach in the orchard was infested and thousands of fine fruit were lying under the trees, full of maggots.

This is the small, reddish fruit-fly in which the nude areas on the shoulders sides of thorax, and scutellum are so pale that they might be called white, with a narrow, pale stripe of the same colour on either side of the thorax, above the base of the wings.

The Three-striped Fruit Fly.

Dacus diversus, Coquillet.

(Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, Yol. YI, No. 3, pp. 139, 140, 1904.)

“ Head and its appendages yellow, base of proboscis brownish ; face of the male unmarked, that of the female with a transverse black fascia a short distance above the oral border, front with a central brown spot, and a row of three brown dots along each eye ; vertex with a narrow black fascia produced forward in the middle, so as to include the lowest ocellus ; occiput with a brown vitta on either side of the centre, the two connected at their upper ends by a brown fascia ; antennae slightly longer than the face ; arista bare. Body black, the following markings yellow : humeral callosities, a short streak in centre of mesonotum, a vitta situated a short distance above each lateral margin of the mesonotum, extending from the suture to the hind margin ; a fascia extending from the front of each of these vittre to the upper part of the sternopleura ; the prosternum largely, the scutellum, a large spot on either side of the metanotum, and including the hypopleura, the hind margins of the abdominal segments, a very. narrow on the fourth, and the base of the ovipositor; mesonotum with a median pair of grey pruinose vittse, which extend from the front end to a short distance beyond the suture; abdomen devoid of black bristles and of long black hairs; ovipositor depressed, slightly longer than the fourth and fifth abdominal segments taken together. Legs of male almost wholly yellow, those of the female yellow, the apices of the femora and whole of the tibiae black, apices of tarsi brownish. Wings hyaline, base of the marginal cell brownish, costa narrowly bordered with brown from apex to auxiliary vein to a point midway between apices of the third and fourth veins, scarcely widening in its apical portion, anal cell filled with brown, which colour encroaches somewhat on the third posterior cell. Length, 4 to 5 mm.

“ Habitat—Colombo, Ceylon, and Bangalore, India.”

He had a series of five male and three female flies, that were bred from maggots infesting oranges.

This is one of the species that Mr. Howlett and I collected at Pusa flying about the melon patches, and again at Bangalore in several mango plantations ; and though a few were attracted by the citronella oil, most of them were caught on the wing.

It appears to be a very distinct species, differing from Dacus ferrugineus in being somewhat smaller in size, and has white or pale yellow line down the centre of the thorax, and the darker and more regular coloration of the abdomen. It differs from Dacus persicce in being larger, and with the black thorax and dorsal stripe on the thorax. The three flies enumerated seem to be the three common species of fruit-flies that infest mangoes, oranges, guavas, and peaches, and have very similar habits, so that they may be checked and destroyed in the same manner.

The Melon or Bitter Gourd Fruit Fly.

(PI. V, figs. 6 and 7.)

Dacus cucurbitce, Coquillet.

(Entomological News, May, 1899, pp. 129, 130.)

The specimens, from which this species was described, were bred from cucumbers in Hawaii, where it is a common and very destructive pest to watermelons, musk melons, cucumbers, tomatoes, and string beans; but it has never been bred from fruit. At the time it was described its native home was unknown, but subsequently Mr. Muir, of the Sugar Planters’ Association laboratories, found that India was its original home ; and my investigations, later on, showed that it was the common Bitter Gourd or Melon Fly, widely distributed over India and Ceylon.

One of my first investigations in Hawaii was in connection with this pest, and, accompanied by Mr. Van Dine, of the United States Experiment Station, who has written a very concise bulletin, The Melon Fly,” published in The Hawaian Forestry and Agriculturist (April, 1906, vol. Ill, p. 127),. I spent several days in the fields and among the melon-growers. Melons are grown under irrigation in large quantities on the rich black soil of Makaha,. about 55 miles from Honolulu, where, at Holt’s ranch, I obtained many specimens. I he work is carried out by Chinese and Japs on the share system, or they rent the land from the owner. The ordinary watermelon, being harder, is not so subject to infestation, after it has reached the size of a hen’s c88> as the cantaloupes (rock melons); but as soon as the melon is set, the cultivators place them in paper bags, and thus protect them from the flies, leaving them on the soft-skinned cantaloupes until they are ripe. In consequence of the great rise in price of all kinds of melons since the advent of the fly, the growers, under the new methods, may make almost as much money as they did before, but the consumer has often to pay 50 cents for what he used to pay only 10 cents in the old days.

Where numerous the flies, probably accidentally, puncture the melon stems, and the resulting maggots destroy the tissue, causing much of it to die. Many of the small melons infested were found to be completely hollowed out, and were just a mass of serai-dry pith and maggots, ready to work through the skin and pupate in the ground beneath. Some we found nearly 2 inches 48531 below the surface. We found hardly a fly at midday in the melon fields, but on examining the weeds and turnip plants forming a border along the irrigation channels, we found them in numbers resting among the green foliage.

At Molokai Island we found some of the growers covering their melon and cucumber beds with cheese cloth, but though it kept the flies out, it also kept all the bees and small insects that, under ordinary conditions, fertilize the flowers, so that very few melons ever set and matured.

In spite of the destruction caused by the fruit-flies, with the use of paper bags, Mr. Holt and his Asiatic partners were shipping 800 melons per week to Honolulu, where they brought from 30 to 50 cents a-piece, the picked ones from 75 to 1 dollar each. He works on the halves system, finds the and, quarters, and a mule to cultivate, the men doing all (he field work, lwhile he attends to the shipping and sale of the produce.

Later on, in the vegetable gardens on the slopes of Mount Tantillus, we found the fruit-fly maggots in many ripening tomatoes and string beans.

There are no laws or regulations dealing with the destruction of damaged fruit in Hawaii. No parasites have been bred from the many pupae and larvae under observation in the Entomological Branch of the United States Experimental Station.

Melon Fly in India and Ceylon.—One of the first species of fruit-fly that I found in India "was JDacus cucuibitce, and wherever we examined melon gardens in Central or North-Westei n India, we noticed this fly hovering about, and we bred it from maggot-infested melons, cucumbers, bitter gourds, and egg plants. One remarkable thing about this species was, that while Mr. Howlett and I could attract thousands of the two smaller fruit-flies with a handkerchief moistened with citronella oil, we never had a single specimen of this fly come to the bait.

This species, though well known in India, and represented in most of the museum collections, had not been named, or, at any rate, identified, until Coquillet named “A new Trypetid from Hawaii.”

In the northern part of Ceylon, at Jaffna, I found many damaged melons containing fruit-fly maggots, and, later on, bred this species from the pupce.

Dacus cucurbitce is one of the larger species of the genus, and can be easily recognised by the mottled wings, the brown tints forming a band along the front margin, and two more or less regular transverse markings on the hind portion.

Herewith is Coquillet’s original description.

Dacus cucurbitce.—- Head light yellow; the occiput, except the sides and upper margin, reddish-yellow, an ocellar black dot, front marked with a brown spot in front of its centre, and with three pairs of orbital brown dots, a black spot on each side of the face near the middle, and a brown spot on the middle of each cheek ; antennae, palpi, and proboscis yellow, the latter mottled with brown ; thorax, reddish-yellow, the humeri, a median vitta on the posterior half of the mesonotum, another on each side, above the insertion of the wings, uniting with.an irregular band which extends upon the pleura to the upper part of the sternopleura, also a large spot on each side of the metanotum, encroaching upon the hypopleui*a, light yellow ; scutellum, except its extreme base, light yellow, bearing two bristles; abdomen light yellow on first two segments, reddish-yellow on the others, the extreme base, a fascia at the bases of the second and third segments, usually a lateral spot on the fourth and fifth, also a dorsal vitta on the last three segments, blackish or brownish ; first segment of the ovipositor of the female slightly longer than the fifth segment of the abdomen. Wings hyaline, the apex of the subcostal cell, from a short distance in front of the apex of the auxiliary vein, the marginal and submarginal cells, the median third of the first basal cell, and a large spot in upper outer corner of the first posterior cell, brown, this colour encroaching on the third posterior cell and bordering the sixth vein almost to its apex ; posterior cross vein bordered with brown, this colour extending to the hind margin of the wing ; upper end of the small cross vein is also bordered with brown. Ilalteres light yellow. Legs light yellow, the broad apices of the femora and the last four joints of the tarsi reddish-yellow; hind tibia; reddish-yellow or dark brown. Length, 6 to 8 mm. Type, No. 4,207 in the United States National Museum.

The South Sea Guava Fly. *

(PI. Ill, figs, la, 2a, 3a.)

Dacus psidii, Froggatt.

(Tephritis psidii, Froggatt, Agricultural Gazette, N.S.W., 1899, p. 501, PI. II, figs, la, 2a, 3a. Miscellaneous Publications, Dep. Agr. N.S.W., No. 303.)

In the original description the numbers of the plate are transposed, but on reference to the letterpress the mistake will be noticed. The larvae were obtained from infested guavas condemned in a shipment of fruit from Noumea, New Caledonia. Specimens were afterwards obtained from granadiilas «.hat came in a similar condition from Fiji.

In general appearance, the maggots which were kept under observation did not differ from those of D. Tryoni, and they pupated in the soil in the breeding-jars just beneath the surface. This is a medium-sized species, measuring 3 lines in length and about 5 across the expanded wines.

The head light brown, with rich metallic purple eyes antenna; brownish-yellow, the last joint black, long and cylindrical, finely pubescent, the bristle stout and long, with scattered bristles on the face and hind margin of the head ; thorax black, with a few fine bristles near the base of the wings, a broad parallel white stripe down the centre, with a pale yellow stripe down either side, the humeri a stripe on the sides marked with creamy white; the scutellum large, angular, broadest in front, so broadly margined with creamy white that the centre forms a black triangle, a pair of black bristles ornamenting the hind margin ; legs brownish yellow, clothed with fine hairs, tarsal spines and claws black ; the wings hyaline, very slightly clouded at the tips j nervurts blackish ; the transverse cubital nervure clouded on either side with black, giving it a thickened appearance ; the apical portion of the second costal, the base of the third costal, and the third basal cell clouded with brown j the abdomen black, elongate, narrow at base, pointed to extremity ; the genitalia ochreous ovipositor consisting of a stout horny pointed process, enclosed in a pale yellow sheath of a granulated structure.

Habitat—New Caledonia and Fiji.

Dacus lonyicornis, Wiedemann.    *

(Aussereuropaische Zweiflügelige Insecten, Yol. II, p. 524, 16 )

This species was described from Java, but I have a specimen obtained in India, so that it probably has a wide range. There is a specimen in Verrall’s Collection under this name that was probably identified by Bigot.

This is one of the large typical forms of the species, with very long antennae, a rather stalked pyriform abdomen, broadly rounded at the extremity It is of a uniform ferruginous tint, with the dorsal surface and sides of the apical half of the abdomen clothed with fine golden pubescence. The wings are hyaline, with a broad well-defined stripe along the costal nervure.

Wiedemann says: “ Reddish, constricted at the base of abdomen, costal edge of wings brown. Length, 4 lines.” Java.

Dacus Lonnsbitryii, Coquillet.

(PI. VI, fig. 10.)

(“Proceedings U.S. National Museum,” Yol. XXIY, No. 1,243, p. 27, 1901.)

In a paper entitled “ New Diptera from Southern Africa,” D. W. Coquillet described four new species of the genus Dacus from specimens brought from Cape Colony by C. P. Lounsbury, the Government Entomologist, when he visited Washington.

Dacus Lounsburyii.u Head yellow, occiput, except the upper and lateral margins, reddish-brown, frontal vitta, except its lower end, reddish-brown, an ocellar spot, one near centre of front and one on the lanule, blackish, a row of four blackish dots along each orbit ; a broad reddish stripe in middle

of face, a black spot on either side near its middle, an oblique reddish line near each orbit, and a large black spot below each eye ; antennse nearly twice as long as the head, brownish-red, the extreme base yellow, the third joint black ; palpi and proboscis brownish-red, apex of the latter largely yellow; body reddish-brown, indistinctly marked with blackish, mesonotum marked behind the suture with three yellow vittre, a yellow fascia extends along the suture, crosses the mesopleura and encroaches on the sternopleura; a spot on the hypopleura, hind margins of thescutellum and of the second abdominal segment laterally yellow ; abdomen three times as long as wide; the third segment in the male bearing a row of black bristles, extending from the venter half way to the middle of the dorsum, situated a short distance in front of the hind margin ; wings hyaline, a brownish band along the costa, filling apex of subcostal cell beyond auxiliary vein, the whole of the marginal and submarginal cells, apical three-fourths of the first posterior and upper edge of the second posterior cell, faintest in basal portion of submarginal cell and darkest in the posterior cells, that in the first posterior cell sometimes having a subhyaline median streak; anal cell filled with yellow and brown, its lobe and the vein extending beyond its apex bordered with brown ; base of the first basal cell to forking of second and third veins yellowish; legs yellowish-brown, first tarsal joint, except apex and broad bases of hind femora, white ; halteres, whitish ; bases of the stems reddish-brown ; basal segment of ovipositor of female greatly flattened, shorter than the preceding abdominal segment ; length, 11 mm.

Described from three males and seven female specimens; the type in the United States National Museum (Catalogue No. 5,786).

Specimens taken at Cape Town and Wynberg, South Africa.

This is one of the largest species of the genus, and is allied to the Australian species Dacus esqualis, described by Coquillet in the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, and Dacus longicornis, Wied., from India and Java.

All of these have long antennse, are of a general ferruginous tint with few yellow markings, the hyaline wings are clouded along the costal nervure, and the large body is pyriform or turbinate with the extremity broadly rounded.

Dacus brevis, Coquillet.

(“Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum,” Yol. XXIV, No. 1,213, p. 28,

1901.)

Head yellow, frontal vittse sometimes tinged in places with reddish-yellow, the occiput, except along the eyes, yellowish-brown, a dark brown spot above the centre of front, a small black spot on the ocelli, three along each orbit, one on the frontal lanule and one on either side of centre of face,

a brown spot below each eye ; antennae shorter than the head, yellowish-brown, becoming dark brown at the apex, arista black, the base yellowish, proboscis and palpi brownish-yellow ; body reddish-brown, mesonotum and abdomen with a mediodorsal black line, and sometimes with blackish markings ; humeri, a stripe along the thoracic suture crossing the mesopleura and encroaching on the sternopleura, a rounded spot on the hypopleura, and the scutellum, except its extreme base, yellow; abdomen one and a half times as long as wide, the third segment in the male bearing a row of black bristles extending from the venter nearly half way to the middle of the dorsum; wings hyaline, the subcostal and marginal cells, base and usually the very narrow edge of the submarginal cell beyond apex of the marginal about half way to tip of third vein, where it expands and fills the entire apical portion of this cell and encroaches on the first posterior cell, brown, a brown cloud on distal part of anal cell ; apex of fourth vein, not or very slightly approaching toward the third vein ; legs yellow, apices and middle and hind femora and bases of middle tibise yellowish-brown, hind tibiae largely, and last four joints of all the tarsi reddish-brown; tibiae and apices of femora sometimes yellowish-red ; halteres yellow ; ovipositor of female almost cylindrical, the basal segment shorter than the last abdominal segment. Length, 5-5 to 6-5 nnn. Described from two male and four female specimens. Type, U.S. National Museum, Washington (No. 5,787). Bathurst, Cape Colony, South Africa.

Dacus immaculcitus, Coquillet.

(Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, Vol. XXIV, No. 1,243, p. 29,

1901.)

“ Differs from brevis as follows :—The spot above centre of front scarcely darker than the reddish-yellow frontal vitta, no black spots on the face, bases of palpi pale yellow, yellow spot on each hypopleura nearly twice as long as wide, brown in marginal cell, not connected with that in apex of the submarginal, the latter extending one-third of distance from apex of third vein to apex of second, ovipositor of female greatly flattened, legs yellow. Length, 5 to 6-5 mm. Four males and four females.” Collected at East London, Cape Colony, Africa. Type in U.S. National Museum, No. 5,789.

Note.—I have received a co-type of this handsome little fruit-fly from Mr. Lounsbury, and add the following :—The eyes dark, the yellow markings on the thorax very bright coloured, scutellum elongate slightly arcuate in front; the dorsal black stripe down the centre of the thorax broadest behind, nearly wedge-shaped, apex of thorax below scutellum black ; abdomen dark reddish-brown, with the centre crossed with a black band or bar that swells down on either side, forming an irregular oval black patch merging into the bar.

Dacus sigmoïdes, Coquillet.

(Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, Vol. XXIV, No. 1,243, p. 29,

1906.)

“ Differs from the above description of brevis only as follows :—The dark brown spot above centre of front is connected with the upper two spots in each of the orbital rows, no brown spot below each eye, no mediodorsal black line on the abdomen, apical section of fourth vein strongly bisinuous, the apex strongly approaching towards the third vein, legs yellow, the apices of the femora, bases of the tibiæ and last four joints of the tarsi slightly darker, more brownish-yellow, knob of halteres yellowish-brown, ovipositor greatly flattened, the basal segment one and one-fourth times as long as the last abdominal segment. Length, 7 mm.” Described from one female specimen. Found in the Island of Mauritius, Africa. Type, U.S. National Museum, No. 5,788.

The Sudan Fruit Fly.

Dacus, sp.

(Theobald—Second Report of the Wellcome Research Laboratories.

Gordon Memorial College, Khartoum, 1906.)

On page 93 Theobald, in his “ Report on Economic Entomology,” figures and gives a general description of a fruit-fly belonging to this genus that is common in the Sudan, where it is a serious trouble to the melon-growers of that part of Africa. He says: “This species comes very near Froggatt’s species {Dacus Tryoni), the Queensland maggot-fly, but is quite distinct.”

His description is as follows:—“The Sudan melon-fly is somewhat wasplike in general appearance. The head is yellowish between the eyes, which are large and dark, there is a dark spot on the occiput and two oval black spots on the face below the antennae, which are yellow with dark apex; the arista is simple. The thorax is slaty-grey, with minute dark brown specks, and fine, pale, backwardly-directed short hairs, a bright nude yellow area at each shoulder, a yellow nude plate on each side in front of the base of each wing, which passes a narrow, wedge-shaped area into the median transverse suture, the lower area of the spot is formed on the pleura;, and there is a smaller one below and another on the pleurrn just behind the wings; the scutellum is yellow and nude, and the metanotum deep slaty-grey.

“ The abdomen is much contracted basally and acute apically, the basal segment is brown, the second has a yellow apical border, the remainder dark brown.

“ The legs are dull, pale yellowish, somewhat transparent basally ; the feet dark brown, the apex of femora and base of the tibiie reddish-brown.

The transparent wings are brown along the costa, and there is a dark brown vein below.

“The chaetotactic characters are very marked, there being four black bristles on the head, four on the front of the thorax, and two on each side of the median suture, one behind the root of the wings, and two long ones on the scutellum. The whole abdomen has fine, paF, backwardly-projecting bristledike hairs. Length, 10 5 mm.”

I am indebted to Mr. Harold H. King, Economic Entomologist to the Wellcome Research Laboratories, for specimens of this very interesting fruit-fl}".

The Olive Fly.

(PI. IV, fig. 2.)

Dacus olece, Rossi.

(Fauna Etrusca, 11, 317, 1538, 1780.)

There is no species of the genus that causes more damage than the olive-fly of the Mediterranean region. The adult fly punctures the ripening olive and deposits its eggs beneath the skin. The maggots feeding upon the tissue cause the olives to wither and drop off, and for many years have thus caused an immense reduction in the output of olive oil, particularly in Italy and ■Sicily. Last year it was estimated to have destroyed 10 per cent, of the total olive crop of Italy. Not only have the producers lost money, but the Government have had to reduce the taxes in the badly-infested districts. The pest has been gradually increasing every year, the returns of 1879-83, when the yield was 3,390,000 hectolitres of oil, have been reduced to 2,005,000 in 1 895-99. As a large reward has been offered by the Government for any effective remedy or cure for this pest, all the entomologists have been studying the olive-fly, and carrying out experiments towards its eradication. When it is understood that the olive trees are grown on all kinds of rugged stony hillsides, and the olives are so small that it is a very different thing to clean up an olive plantation than an orange orchard, the difficulties of the situation can be understood.

Professor F. Silvestri, of Naples, advocates parasites, but no parasite of any commercial value has been discovered, though several have been bred from the pupae of the olive-fly.

Dr. A. Berlese, of Florence, has carried out many experiments in trying to attract the flies with sweetened poisoned mixtures, with a certain amount of success.

The olive-fly is one of the smallest sp»ecies, not more than 2^ lines in length. The wings hyaline, with dark nervures, very slightly clouded with yellow at the extremity of the first parallel vein, a small black spot at the extreme tip and faint clouding of brown on the submarginal cell. The head dull yellow, eyes black, with a black spot below the base of the antennre, the latter blackish at the extremities, a few black bristles on the summit. The thorax black, with the dorsal surface clothed with fine silvery pubescence, so that the black forms three narrow parallel black lines on the thorax ; legs, nude patches on the sides of the shoulders, and the area above and below the base of the wings yellow, inner portion of the scutellum black, hind portion yellow. The abdomen black, covered with a scattered grey pubescence, the basal segments marked with pale transverse bands, and an irregular parallel bar or blotch of reddish-brown occupying the centre of the apical segments, the apical segment reddish-yellow, with the sheath of the ovipositor black, with the ovipositor reddish.

As might be supposed, there has been a great deal written about this destructive fly. In Ci Observations upon recent literature relating to the Olive Pest,” Professor Guercio gives a list of thirteen papers published in Italy between the years 1877 and 1907, dealing with the olive-fly generally, and there are many other special reports. Dr. Navarro, in his “ Memoir relative to the Diseases of the Olive” (published in Madrid, 1898, for the Ministerio de Fomento), gives a very good account of the olive-fly in Spain, which is illustrated with a plate showing how it damages the olive.

As far back as 1822 Briganti (Atti del Real Institute di Napoli) gave an account of this pest, and four years later (1826), gave a detailed desciiption of its metamorphoses and life-history.

Westwood (“ Modern Classification of Insects,” 1840) says : “ It is known to the natives of Provence under the name of Chiron. It is of a whitish colour; its mouth is furnished with two hooks ; it at first feeds on the young leaves, but afterwards penetrates into the fruit.” Of course, the statement that the maggot first feeds upon the young leaves of the olive tree is incorrect.

Broun’s Fruit Fly.

(PI. IV, fig. 3.)

Dacus (Tephrites) xanthodes, Broun.

(Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, XXXVII, p. 327, 1904.)

This name was given to a species, bred by Captain Broun in New Zealand, from larvae obtained infesting pine-apples, granadillas, guavas, and mammee apples brought from Suva and Raratonga, Fiji.

He says : “ It differs from Trypeta psidxi in being longer, differently coloured and sculptured, and having no dusky areas on the wings. From Dacus Tryoni it is distinguished by a greater length of body and expanse of wing, uniform coloration, without fuscous or yellow marks, dissimilar clothing and sculpture, less broadly oviform or wasp-like hind body and stout antennal setse. In D. Tryoni the flanks of the sternum are fuscous.”

Before describing this insect, Captain Broun sent me several specimens, to see whether I could identify it for him ; but we have never bred this species from imported fruit, and it has never been recorded from Australia.

Briefly, it may be thus described : Length of body, 4^ lines ; expanse of wings, 7j| lines; eyes dark, face unspotted, with very few black bristles on the head; general colour, pale ochreous yellow, with the tarsi brownish, and the abdomen somewhat darker than the thorax. A faint yellow dorsal stripe on thorax, running through the centre of the scutellum, with a pale yellowish-white stripe margining each side and marking the sides of the scutellum, which is very prominent and arcuate behind ; only a few black bristles on either side of the thorax. The wings are hyaline, with only the costal nervure and the next parallel vein slightly ochreous ; abdomen of female elongated, and truncate at apex.

The Large Australian Fruit Fly.

(PI. VI, fig. 11.)

Dacus cequalis, Coquillet.

(Proceedings of the Linnean Society, N.S.W., 1908.)

This is one of our largest fruit-flies, and is remarkable for the very broad, dark ferruginous stripe along the front margin of the wing, the long antennae, and very wasp-shaped body. Several specimens were obtained by Mr. A. T. Hunter in the maggot state in oranges growing near Gosford, New South Wales. These maggots were bred out in the Entomological Laboratory, and found to be a very different species to the common Queensland fruit-fly. When in Washington last year, I submitted specimens to Mr. Coquillet for determination. He has since sent me a technical description for publication under the above name. This description has been published in the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales for this year (1908).

The type will, therefore, be in the National Museum at Washington, U.S. A. ; a second specimen I presented to the Entomological Collections of the Imperial Research Laboratories at Pusa, India; and another co-type is in the departmental collections in Sydney. It comes close to Dacus Lounsburyi, Coq., from South Africa, and Dacus longicornis, Wied., from India and Java.

Dacus cequalis, Coquillet.—“Near longicornis, Wiedemann, from Java, but differing from the description in having the occiput chiefly reddish-brown instead of yellowish, the pleura has two yellow streaks instead of black ones, the anal cell is brown, &c. The evenness of the costal brown area of the wings, which is bounded by the costa and fourth vein, will serve to distinguish the present species from most of others. Reddish-brown, front mottled with yellow, face yellow, an elongated black mark on each side ; cheeks margin of occiput, humeri, a streak extending along the mesothoracic suture each side and crossing the mesopleura, a large spot on the hypopleura, the scutellum, except the base, halteres, sides and hind margin of the second segment of the abdomen, narrow hind margin of the fifth segment, also the tarsi, pale yellow ; femora largely blackish-brown. Antennie projecting about half the length of the third joint below the oral margin. Abdomen broadly clavate slightly longer than the ovipositor of the female. Wings greyish hyaline, the front margin from the costa to the fourth vein wholly dark brown, anal cell brown, the constricted outer portion and the vein beyond it broadly bordered with brown.” Length (excluding the ovipositor), 8 to 9 mm.

Dacus Frenchi, n.sp.

(PI. IY, fig. 4.)

This species was figured in a coloured plate in an article on Fruit Flies, written by Mr. C. French, Government Entomologist in Victoria, in their Journal of Agriculture, May, 1907, which was issued afterwards as Bulletin No. 26, Department of Agriculture, Victoria. In this paper there is no attempt to describe or name this handsome fly ; French simply calls attention to it, having been bred from oranges coming into Victoria from New Caledonia. In the plate the coloration of the wings is accurate, but the pattern upon the thorax is very misleading, as it shows a transverse band of four yellow marks occupying the centre of the dorsal surface, whereas there is only a light broad bar in the centre forming a silvery-brown dorsal stripe.

This is a large species, measuring 10 mm., with a broad rounded body and the large hyaline wings, with a broad costal stripe of light reddish-brown running right round the tip so that it forms a terminal fourth oblique band on the wing, at the basal half is a double band forming an irregular triangle with a clear centre, and other oblique battds (the first broadest) between it and the stripe, running round the extremity, so that there are four oblique transverse bands crossing the wing in a downward direction.

Head: proboscis fuscous, with a large black spot on either side below the base of the antennae; eyes reddish-brown, with dark prominent reddish blotch in centre of face with a row of stout bristles along the hind margin of the head. Thorax dull yellowish-brown, with the nude areas on the shoulders, the sides and the scutellum very pale yellow, broadest in front, slightly truncate behind > the dorsal surface of the thorax clouded with black in an indistinct pattern forming two slight parallel dark bars, the centre pale, and the whole clothed with silvery pubescence. Legs yellow, with the tarsi darkest, clothed with fine hairs, spines black. Abdomen finely pubescent, broadly rounded, with the ovipositor and sheath very much produced ; general colour pale ochreous yellow with the base, a short band on the second segment, and a narrow well-defined narrow parallel black band crossing through the centre of third, fourth, and fifth segments, and a confluent blotch occupying the sides of the third and fourth segments.

Habitat—New Caledonia. One female specimen.

Dacus ornatissimua, n.sp.

(PI. YIJ, figs. 13 and 14.)

General light chestnut brown to ochreous ; wings hyaline, with a fine, pale ferruginous stripe along the costal nervure, except the basal cells, which are unclouded, a transverse stripe down the inner edge of the wing ; length, 6 mm. ; eyes almost black ; antennae moderately long, touched with fuscous at the tip, a round black spot on either side of the face below the antennae, and four small spots above, and a few short bristles on the vertex ; thorax without yellow markings, but the dorsal surface is occupied with a well-defined black pattern formed of two short parallel bars in line with the inner margins of the eyes, merging into an irregular transverse band through the mesonotum, which is continued in a broken band round the sides; a black blotch on the ventral surface below and between the forelegs, with another just behind the base of the wings ; the whole of the dorsal surface of the thorax black, behind which is the broadly rounded chestnut-coloured scutellum, from the hind margin of which stand out two stout bristles ; below the scutellum, above the base of the abdomen, are two well-detined black blotches ; legs yellow, the tarsi slightly clouded ; abdomen ochreous, with indistinct narrow transverse lines of darker colour, but no defined bands.

Habitat—New Caledonia. Bred from mandarins in Sydney.

Dacus curvipennis, n.sp.

(PI. VII, figs. 15 and 16.)

This is a handsome, dark yellow and black fruit-fly, of medium size, with hyaline wings with the costal margin clouded forming a regular narrow band extending round the tip of the wing, a small V-shaped blotch extends downward from the costal stripe clouding either side of the transverse cross nervure between the first posterior and basal cell, with the usual stripe down the inner side of the wing. Length, 6 mm. Head yellow, eyes purplish-black, antennae fuscous at the tips, bristles black, without black spots on the face; thorax, with the whole of the dorsal surface covered with a dark shield-shaped black patch, with the centre covered with an elongate double

bar of silvery white ; the shoulders, sides of the body, and scutellum bright yellow, a narrow band or short bar of the same colour on the sides of the thorax; the scutellum somewhat elongated when viewed from behind, more convex when viewed from above, with two bristles at the hind margin; a few scattered bristles on the hind margin of the head and the sides of the thorax; legs yellow, thighs of hind legs and tarsi darker; abdomen elongate, with the base and two narrow transverse black bands below, the second broadest on the sides ; sheath and ovipositor elongated.

Habitat—Fiji. Bred in Sydney from larvae taken from bananas in shipments of fruit from Suva. Several specimens of both sexes. Type in Agricultural Department’s collection, New South Wales.

Dacus basil is, Walker.

(List of Diptera, British Museum, Part III, 1849, p. 1072.)

“ Body bluish-green, head tawny, black beneath and on the crown ; a white stripe along each eye; face white, its sides without bristles; epistoma prominent; eyes pitchy; fore parts flat, the facets much larger than those elsewhere; sucker black, clothed with tawny hairs; palpi tawny, rather large, beset with black bristles ; feelers ferruginous, full as long as the face, third joint linear, slender, pitchy towards the hip, more than four times the length of the second ; bristles slender, black, bare, tawny towards the base, much longer than the third joint; chest covered with whitish bloom ; abdomen linear tawny towards the base beneath, much longer and narrower than the chest; legs ferruginous, clothed with very short black hairs; feet pitchy towards the tips ; claws black ; foot cushions tawny ; wings slightly grey, brown along the fore border from near one-third of the length to the tip ; middle and lower cross veins clouded with brown, which has the darkest hue on the former ; wing ribs ferruginous, veins pitchy, ferruginous towards the base, longitudinal veins nearly straight; middle cross vein very oblique, lower cross vein nearly upright, parted by little less than its length from the middle cross vein by much more than its length from the tip of the wing, and by little more than one-fourth of its length from the hind border; poisers pale tawny ; length of body, 2f lines; of the wings, 5 lines.”

Habitat—Port Essington, North Australia (Gould’s Collection).

Dacus lougistylus, Wiedemann.

(Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 522, PI. X, fig. 1, 1828-30.)

Wiedemann says : “General colour dull reddish, with the thorax spotted, scutellum very pale yellow. Abdomen yellow, banded; wings, marked at the apex with dusky brown.”

Length, 3| lines. Habitat—Egypt,

There are a number of specimens determined by Loew in the K. K. Hofmuseum at Vienna under this name that were collected in Cairo, Egypt, 1858. In the Royal Museum of Hungary, at Budapest, there are other specimens labelled Assouan, Egypt. Though this is a common species in I did not find any specimens in the departmental collections when going through them with Mr. Willcocks. The species from the Soudan, described by Theobald, is closely allied, and may be identical with this species.

I made the following rough notes on this species in the Vienna Museum :

Rather bright reddish-brown, with the nude patches on the shoulders, the angular nude patches on the sides of the mesonotum in front of the wings, and the scutellum bright yellow. The abdomen reddish-brown with three transverse yellow bands. Wings hyaline, with dusky band along the costal .cells.”

Habitat—Egypt.

Dacus maculiger, Doleschall.

{Natuurk. Tidjschr van Nederl, Indie, Vol. XVII, 122, 79 [Baclrocera

maculiger].)

This is a very distinct species, originally described from Amboina. There are four specimens labelled “Collected Thorey, Cape York, 1868,” in the K. K. Naturhistor Hofmuseum at Vienna, but Dr. Handlirsch informed me that the locality might not be exact, as Thorey was a dealer, and the specimens had probably been bought from him. They appear to be very clcse to the typical specimen, and are labelled by Loew (who determined many of the Diptera in this museum) Dasyneura zonala, Saund., or maculiger, Dol.

Head and thorax yellow, dorsal surface of the thorax curiously patterned in slate-grey, forming a large patch in the centre truncate behind the head, forking into a bar on either side, with the hind portion produced into two bars running to the sides behind. Abdomen yellow, with a narrow brown band at the base, below which, across the middle, a broader band encircles it with a well-defined parallel band running down the centre of the apical segments to the anal extremity. Legs yellow, mottled with brown. The wings hyaline, with the exception of the clouded margin at the tip, and an «oblique stripe in a line with the body.

In the specimens said to come from Cape York the colours are darker, but the yellow markings on the front and sides of thorax and scutellum are brighter yellow.

Habitat—Amboina.

Dacus puuctatifrons, Karsch.

(Entomologische Nachrichten, Yol. XIII, p. 8, 1887.)

“ General colour reddish-brown to dull brown, clothed with short grey pubescence. The face yellow, punctate in front, marked on each side with three large black spots ornamenting the antennae below on each side; antennae elongate ; legs reddish-brown ; thorax on each side striated, shoulders shining pale yellow ; scutellum pale yellow; abdomen ovate, the dorsal surface of the hind margin of the second segment yellow, the remaining segments yellow in the centre with the anal segment short and brown ; wings hyaline, costa banded to the last nervure brownish, transverse nervure small, apparently brown on the edge. Length, 8 mm.”

Habitat—Pangi Andongo.

Dacus caudatus, Fabricius.

(Syst. Anti. 276, 16, 1805 ; Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., 11, 518, 8, 1828-30 ;

Walker, List Diptera, British Museum, IY, 1073, 1848-55.)

This species is described from Java. There is a specimen in Mr. Yerrail’s collection under this name.

It is a rather small species, of a general light yellow colour, with indistinct dark yellow spots and marks on the thorax, the scutellum prominent ; abdomen yellow, crossed with two narrow transverse black bands above, with a fine line of the same colour forming a dorsal stripe from the base to the tip of the abdomen with an irregular blotch on either side. The hyaline wings with a dark costal stripe, with two irregular spots below crossing the wing.

Wiedemann says : “General colour yellow, thorax mottled with yellow and black, abdomen marked with black stripes, and a band; wings and costa with an oblique short stripe and bands of brown. Length : Male, 54 lines; female, 4 lines. Habitat—Java.”

Fabricius ; D. caudatus yellow ; thorax greyish, with a yellow spot; wings hyaline, with the curved bases black.”

As large as D. stylati; head yello-w; front of face spotted with black ; thorax greyish ; nude patches on shoulders, lateral lines, and hind margin of the scutellum yellow; abdomen oval, yellovq with a stripe of black in the centre; ovipositor elongated ; wings white hyaline; costa clouded, base with clear markings, and, moreover, curved to the black base.

Dacus fascipennis, Wiedemann.

(Zoologisches Magazin, Yol. Ill, 28, 42, 1817-23; Auss. Zweifl., Vol. 11,519, 9, 1828-30 : Van de Wulp, Tijdschr v., Entom. XXIII, 181, 42, PI. XI, fig. 4, 1880; Bactrocera fasciatipennis, Doleschall, Natuurk Tijdschr, van Nederl. Indie, X, 1856, 412, 56, PI. Ill, fig. 1. Java and Sumatra).

There is a specimen in the Royal Museum of Hungary, said to have been determined by Wiedemann from Astrolobe Bay, New Guinea. Wiedemann says: “Fu-cous marked with yellow, costal portion of the wings dusky with three honeycomb-like blotches at the end.” Length: Male, 3 £ lines. Habitat— Java.

Dacus emittens, Walker.

(Pro. Linnean Society, Vol. IV, 1860, 152-184; Osten-Saken, Annali del Museo Genova, XVI, 1881, 460.)

A very large species, dark brown to ochreous, with the hyaline wings clouded with a fuscous blotch towards the apical half, and stained along the costal nervure with a similar tint. The head yellow ; sides of the thorax darkest; scutellum stained, probably yellow, with two stout bristles on the hind margin. The abdomen yellow, with a very distinct pattern, the base lightly marked with black, an elongated spot or short bar in the centre of the basal half, with a narrow black line crossing the centre of the back, with a parallel one meeting it, and on the divisions on either side two black spots, the lower one smallest.

Several specimens in Mr. Verrall’s collection, labelled Celebes, by Bigot.

Dacus Vrauevfeldi, Schiner.

(Reise Novara Zoology Diptera, 1868, p. 262.)

“ Dorsal surface of thorax blackish-brown, with three broad, grey, longitudinal stripes, formed or continued from the fine, glittering, white pubescence, the outer ones close to the edge of the dorsal surface; the sides at base of the wing-bosses on the shoulders, and scutellum reddish-yellow, the latter „ with a broadened middle, black at the base; apex of the thorax shining black, broadest on the sides. Abdomen with a transverse yellow band interrupted in the middle at the margin of the second segment with two yellowish black stripes, sometimes white, run down to the anal segment, the latter yellow with black line behind, moderately short; sheath of ovipositor reddish-yellow ; the under surface of the abdomen completely yellow. Head, orange, with the bristles black ; antennae with a black spot on the sides below the base ; antennae bright orange, broad, the last joint truncate at the tip ; the bristle bare. Legs pale yellow, blackish at base, thighs clouded with reddish-brown, the tibiae, legs, and tarsi reddish-brown. Wings hyaline, with two arched bands ; the upper, beginning at the base, follows the cubital vein up to the little cross vein, then goes over this and the hinder cross vein to the edge of the wing, the lower one covering the anal vein. The little cross vein is very oblique; the hinder one, too, is oblique, placed outwards, and both coming close together. Anal cell suddenly narrowed, and long drawn out underneath the 4th.

One male and two female specimens. Habitat—Stuart Island.”

The clouding of the base of the thighs is often very variable in the brightly-coloured male, the stripes on the abdomen broader than in the female. I have carefully compared all Walker’s species of Dacus, and found none that could be identical with my species. It seems to me, moreover, that the most of these species (Walker’s) may not belong to the genus Dacus. ’

Dacus africanus, Adams.

(The Kansas University Science Bulletin, Yol. Ill, No. 6, October, 1905,

pp. 149-208.)

This is a species of fruit-Hy described in the above publication by C. F. Adams, in a paper entitled “ Diptera Africana, 1.” The specimens were collected by Mr. F. L. Snow, near Salisbuty, Rhodesia, South Africa.

Male : close to D. brevis, Coq., and D. sigmoides, Coq., from Cape Colony. Head yellow; front reddish-yellow in the middle, greyish pollinose along the orbits, ocellar dot, frontal lunule, three spots on orbits, and a spot in the centre of front, black ; the three spots on orbits each bears a black, bristly hair ; a vertical and post-vertical bristle present; face straight, sloping on the sides; cheeks yellow, and furnished with a black spot below eyes ; occiput yellow and reddish-yellow variegated ; antenme about as long as head, yellow, tip of third joint and arista largely blackish. Thorax opaque reddish, finely scrobiculate, sparse pile whitish ; humeri, a stripe beginning on upper margin of sternopleurse, traversing the mesopleune and along transverse suture to near middle of mesonotum, a spot on metaplune, the scutellum, except the extreme base, and halteres, yellow ; two small spots just in front of transverse suture, two large ones behind it, a stripe just in front of the yellow of the mesopleune, the sternopleurse largely, two spots on metanotum and metapleura largely blackish ; three small black bristles bet ween humeri on anterior margin of thorax, one on side just behind humeri, one at base of transverse suture, one postalar, one transalar, an apical pair of scutellar bristles, and one mesopleural bristle present. Abdomen reddish, finely scrobiculate, and with whitish sparse pile ; third segment laterally7 along posterior margin, with a short row of black bristles; venter yellowish. Legs light yellow; coxae blackish at base; femora on apical fourth, tibiae wholly, the tarsi apieally7, reddish-yellow. Wings hyaline ; a fuscous stripe along first vein, from base to apex, thence along costa to tip of third vein, and another one along lobe of anal cell to wing margin ; auxiliary7 cell rudimentary ; tips of third and fourth veins nearly straight; small cross-vein inclined forward. Length, 7 mm.” One specimen collected in June.

48531 c

List of Walker’s species.

These species of the genus Dclcus were described by him, from specimens collected by A. R. Wallace in the Malay Archipelago, in a series of papers entitled “ Catalogue of Dipterous Insects,” &c., eleven in number, published in the Proceedings of the Linnean Society between the years 1857 and 1865. These descriptions are very brief, and as the types are not in existence, or, at any rate, their whereabouts unknown, it is very difficult to determine any of his species. The descriptions can be seen in the Proc. Linn. Society of the years mentioned.

1.    Dacus absolotus. Vo]. VI, 1862, p. 22. Ceram.

2.    ,, addens. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 149. Macassar.    ■

3.    ,,    areolatus. Vol. V, 1861, p. 295. Batjan.

4.    ,,    biarcuatus. Vol. VIII, 1865, p. 122. New Guinea.

5.    ,,    bilineatis. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 150. Macassar.

6.    ,,    concisus. Vol. VII, 1864, p. 227. Waigoe.

7.    ,,    contrahens. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 151. Macassar.

8.    „    curvi/er. Vol. VII, 1864, p. 229. Waigoe.

9.    ,,    covformis. Vol. I, 1857, p. 34. Singapore, Celebes.

10.    ,,    detrudens. Vol. VIII, 1865, p. 135. Salawatti.

11.    „    devius. Vol. V, 1861, p. 250. Batjan.

12.    „    diffusus. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 153. Macassar.

13.    ,,    divergens. Vol. V, 1861, p. 149. Celebes.    .

14.    ,,    disceipennis. Vol. V, 1861, p. 294. Batjan.

15.    ,,    emittens. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 152. Celebes.

16.    ,,    exigens. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 151. Macassar.

17.    'expertus. Vol. VI, 1862, p. 14. Gilolo.

18.    ,,    expandens. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 114. Aroe.

19.    ,,    figuratus. Vol. I, 185.7, p. 133. Borneo.

20.    ,,    fulvitarsis. Vol. I\r, 1860, p. 153. Macassar.

21.    „    furcifer.    Vol.    VI,    1862,    p.    14.    Gilolo and Ternate.

22.    „    lielemyzoides.    Vol.    VII,    1864, p. 220. Mysol.

23.    „    imitans.    Vol.    IV,    1860,    p.    152.    Celebes.

24.    ,,    inaptus.    Vol.    IV,    1860,    p.    151.    Macassar.

25.    ,,    inscriptis. Vol. V, 1861, p. 162. Amboina.

26.    ,,    instablis. Vol. V^, 1861, p. 250. New Guinea.

27.    ,,    latifcicia. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 114. Aroe.

28.    „    lateralis. Vol. VIII, 1865, p. 123. Waigoe, New Guinea.

29.    „    lituratus. Vol. V, 1861, p. 251. Waigoe, New Guinea. '

30.    „ lativentris. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 115. Aroe.    *

31.    „    longivitta. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 115. Amboina, Aroe.

32.    „    mutilloides. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 115. Aroe, New Guinea.

33.    „    nigrilinea. Vol. V, 1861, p. 251. New Guinea.

34.    „    perplexus. Vol. VI, 1863, p. 14. Gilolo.

35.    „    pompilioides. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 116. Aroe.

36.    „    pectoralis. Vol. Ill, 1859, p. 114. Aroe, Batjan, Waigoe.

37.    Dacus repletus.    Vol. V, 1861, p. 296. Batjan, Kaisaa.

38.    „    pubiseta.    Vol. V, 1861, p. 291. Mysol, Batjan.

39.    ,, sepsoides. Vol. V, 1861, p. 163. Amboina, Batjan.

40.    ,,    sepedonoides. Vol. VII, 1864, p.    228. AVaigoe.

41.    ,, speculifer. Vol. VIII, 1865, p. 122. New Guinea.

42.    ,,    strigifer.    Vol. VI, 1862, p. 13.    Gilolo.

43.    ,,    strigifinis.    Vol. V, 1861, p. 295.    Batjan.

44.    „    sordidus.    Vol. V, 1861, p. 251.    Mysol, Waigoe.

45.    „    signatipes.    Vol. V, 1861, p. 163.    Amboina.

46.    ,,    terminifer. Vol. IV, 1860, p. 152. Macassar.

47.    ,,    varialis.    Vol. VIII, 1865, p. 123. New Guinea.

There is a second species under the name of divergens, in Vol. V, 1861, p. 149. Macassar, Batjan.

The following species have been described from various localities, but I have not seen specimens in any of the collections examined.

48.

49.

50.

51.

52.

53.


54.


55.


56.


57.

58.

59.

60. 61. 62. 63.


Dacus africanits. C. F. Adams, Kansas University Science Bulletin 3, 1905.

,,    areoleucus.    Wiedemann, Auss.    Zweifl,    Vol.    II,    p.    520.

Locality unknown.

ceneus. Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 513. Java. ,,    armatus. Fabricius, Systema    Antliatorum,    1805,    273.

Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 517, 1828-30. New Guinea.

„    bicolor. Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Arol. II, p. 526. Brazil.

,,    braevipes. Fabricius, Syst. Anti. 1805, 272 ; Wiedemann,

Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 513. Brazil.

,,    brevistriga.    Walker, Trans. Ent. Soc.,    Vol.    V,    p.    323,

1858-61. Natal.

,,    flavicornis.    Wiedemann, Auss.    Zweifl.,    Vol.    II,    p.    514.

Brazil.

,, fraterculus. Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 525. Brazil.

,, fuscatus. Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., A7ol. II. Locality?

,, ivflexus. Fabricius, Syst. Anti., 1805, p. 273.

,, incisus. AValker, Trans. Ent. Soc., Vol. V, p. 323, 1858-61. Burmah.

,, Kluqii. AViedemann, Analecta entomologica, 1824, 56, 125, and Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 523. East Indies.

„    limbipennis. Macquart, Dipteres Exotiques,    1838-42,

Vol. II, 3, p. 217, plate 29, fig. 9. Java.

icarus. Osten-Saken, Berlin Ent. Zeitschr., XXAU, p. 224, f. 8, 1882. Philippines.

„    maculentus. A\Tiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 525.

Locality unknown.


64.

Dacus parallelus. Wiedemann, Auss Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 515. Brazil.

65.

55

pectoralis. AValker, Trans. Ent. Soc., Vol. V, p. 322, 1858-61. Natal.

66.

55

ritsemce. Weyenberg, Archives Neerlandaises, IV, 1869, p. 60 ; Osten-Saken, Ann. Museo Genova, XVI, p. 460, 1881. Java.

67.

55

serpentinus. Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 521. Brazil.

68.

>5

sgualidus. Walker, Trans. Ent. Soc., Vol. V, p. 323. Hindustan.

69.

55

trivittatus. Walker, List of Diptera, British Museum, Vol. IV, 1072, 1849. Philippines.

70.

55

umberosus. Fabricius, Syst. Anti., 247 ; Wiedemann, Auss. Zweifl., Vol. II, p. 517. Sumatra.


The following names are attached to specimens of Dacns in Mr. Verrall’s collection, said to be in Bigot’s handwriting, but are probably MS. names, and no descriptions, as far as I can find, have been published of them :—

Dacus amoyensis. Bigot,

1845.

Amoy.

,, fulviventris. „

55

New Guinea.

,, ornatypes. „

55

India.

„ rufipetia. „

35

Loc. Ì

„ fulvidus. ,,

1842.

India.

„ pictus. „

55

Ceylon.

Genus—Ceratitis.


(Macleay, Zoological Journal, XVII, 1829 ; Trypeta, Wied. ; Pefalophora, Macq. ; Halferopbora, Rondani.)

This genus was created by Macleay for the fruit-fly he bred from the oranges from the Azores ; he did not define either the generic characters of the group or the specific character of his new species, but instead sent a very fine, highly-magnified coloured drawing to Mr. Vigors, the editor of the Zoological Journal, which was beautifully reproduced on plate XV.

Wiedemann, who had described it in the genus Trypeta, still retained it in that genus when he published his general work on exotic diptera in 1830. Afterwards Macquart classed the genus Petalophora with this species in the Nouvelles Suites de Bufon, 1835. Guerin, however, placed them in Macleay’s genus when he published his Monograph of a Genus Muscidæ named Ceratitis, and in which he described three new species in 1842.

Rondani, in his Podromus Dipterologicæ Italicæ (1856-77), placed the members of this genus in a new genus he created, and which he called Halterophora because the name Ceratitis was preoccupied. This was followed

PLATE II.


FRUIT FLIES.

i, 2 Rhagoletes pomonella. ia, 2a, Ceratitis capitata.


4a


by Penzig, in the Annali de Agricoltura, 1887. Tryon used the later name, which I followed in my Notes on Fruit Flies ( Agricultural Gazette, JVeiv South Wales, 1899). On looking up Rondani’s reasons, I find that the word Ceratitis has, according to Packard's list of genera, been used three times : for Molluscia Hann, 1825 ; Macleay Diptera, 1829 ; andServielle Coleóptera, 1835. However, I do not see why we should discard it, for it is such a characteristic name, and is not likely to clash with the name of a group of molluscia. I have, therefore, returned to the old name because, too, it is still the recognised name for this group in Europe and America.

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly.

(PI. II, figs, la, 2a, 3, 4a; PI. VIII, fig. 18.)

Ceratitis capitata, Wiedemann.

(Tephritis capitata, Wiedemann, Analecta Entomológica, p. 55, Vol. IV, 1824 ; Ceratitis cil riper de, Macleay, Zoological Journal, XVII, p. 475, PI. XV, 1829; Ceratitis hispánica, de Brême, Annals de la Société Entomologique, Vol. XI, p. 189, PL VII, 1842).

Though Wiedemann first described this species, it was Macleay’s paper, “ Notice of Ceratitis citriperda, an insect very destructive to oranges,” that first called attention to it as an orange pest, under the very appropriate name of Ceratitis citriperda. In this paper he states that he had obtained specimens from the Azores, where they infested a great quantity of the oranges, at that date sent from these islands to the London markets. He says : “I ought, however, to observe that I have seen the perfect fly on a heap of oranges in the market place of Funchal, in the island of Madeira, and also in St. Jago, one of the Cape Verds. I am informed, moreover, that a maggot infests oranges in the West Indies, but I have not myself yet seen it.” In this very interesting paper, Macleay makes some general remarks on the cleaning-up of orchards, which are just as applicable to the fruit-growers of to-day as they were eighty years ago.

Wiedemann described this species, and said his specimens came from the East Indies, and his type, if it still exists, will be found in the Royal Museum of Copenhagen. All the writers that have followed Wiedemann and Macleay have taken it for granted that they described the same species, one from the Azores Islands (though now known all over the Mediterranean region) and the other from the East Indies ; yet if the locality of Wiedemann’s specimens is correct, it is very strange that Ceratitis capitata has never been discovered in that part of the world since Wiedemann obtained it. We have the exact locality of Macleay’s specimens, while W'iedemann’s is the East Indies, a variable locality in those days.

M. Cattoire, who had been paymaster of the troops in Mauritius, had noticed oranges infested with maggots in the orange groves of that island. He wrote to Macleay and sent him a specimen, which was, unfortunately, a female, in which the specific characters were not so easily defined. This Macleay considered identical with his species ; and misled probably by secondhand observations, he said the fly deposited her eggs in the ovary of the orange flowers, and that the larvæ developed with the fruit. This species was afterwards defined by Guerin, who gave it specific rank as Ceratitis cattoirei.

The Marquis de Brême, in 1842, described specimens which he obtained from oranges at Malaga, southern Spain, and which he considered distinct from Macleay’s species, under the nameof Ceratitis hispanica,and figured both species in colours. Though there are some slight differences, it is now-fairly evident that de Brême’s species is identical with that of Macleay and Wiedemann.

The original home of Ceratitis capitata is, probably, Spain, one of the great homes of the orange, and from which, at the present time, a great quantity come into the British markets. From there it was carried to the Azores and the orange-growing islands of that region at a very early date. It extends right round the Mediterranean ; it is found in the south of France, and there are several instances of slight outbreaks close to Paris ; but it has never become established in such northern latitudes. In England, there are specimens in the Oxford Museum. These were recorded by Westwood in the Gardeners' Chronicle, 1848, “captured in Thames-street, London, 1848,” and others were bred from maggots in imported oranges. It is plentiful in Valencia and Malaga ; at times it destroys a great quantity of oranges in the latter town towards the end of the season.

It is found in southern Italy, at Calabria, and is recorded as a serious pest at times. It is well known in Sicily, where a number of reports have been published concerning its depredations, and it is locally known as la mosco delle arance. In 1879-80 it did a great deal of damage in the neighbourhood of Messina, and also again in 1882.

I could obtain no record of it in the Greek Archipelago, nor did I find it in the markets of Turkey ; but in Malta it was recorded, according to Henslow, as a pest in 1875. In the Gardeners' Chronicle, 1890, he stated that it had been a serious pest for the preceding three years upon mandarin oranges, and he noticed that the flies were always most numerous in the hot, dry seasons, and particularly scarce in cold, wet ones.

In 1889 a committee was appointed by the Governor of Malta to draw up a report on the pest, and on the best methods of dealing with it. They recommended that all fruit infested should be collected and destroyed, and suggested strewing the surface of the ground with 1 part of sulphate of iron to 24 parts of sand, the ground to be subsequently watered.

I have been unable to obtain any data of how the pest is controlled at the present time in Malta.

It was introduced into southern Africa many years ago, and Miss Ormerod, in her Observations on some injurious insects of South Africa,” gives an account of the damage it does at the Cape. In Natal and some of the other African States several native species of Ceratitis have been desciibed as pests that have turned their attention to cultivated fruits ; but Fuller has lately recorded the appearance of this species in the Natal orchards in the Fourth Report of the Government Entomologist, 1903-4. In this report Fuller states : “ Amongst the batch of newly-observed pests which I have to record is that known as the Mediterranean Fruit Fly {Ceratitis capitata).”

There are a number of different species of the genus Ceratitis found in the southern half of Africa, so that it almost appears to be the home of the group ; and our particular species, C. capitata, may have been a native of northern Africa and crossed over into southern Spain.

In the tropical portion of the eastern coast of South America, Lounsbury found this Mediterranean fruit-fly widely distributed and one of the worst fruit pests ; but it was there thought to be an introduced fly of somewhat recent date.

None of the countries of North America or the West Indian Islands (with the exception of Bermuda) are infested with this fruit-fly, though the conditions seem well adapted to its habits.

It was recorded as a peach-pest in Bermuda in 1890 in “ Insect Life but is said to have infested fruit on this island for about forty years. Howard, when he identified the species, suggested that the orchardists should clean up their orchards and burn or bury all infested fruit; but no particular measures were taken until last year, when the Board of Agriculture had an Act passed, entitled the Fruit Fly Destruction Act of 1907. This Act came into force on 1st March of that year, the Legislature having granted ¿£500 for the purpose of carrying out the recommendations of the Board of Agriculture, namely, that an attempt be made to eradicate the insect pest known as the fruit-fly (Ceratitis capitata).” The following remarks are taken from a report furnished by Mr. T. I. Harris, Director of the Public Gardens, under whose supervision the work was placed, and which was printed in The Bermuda Colonist, 12th August, 1907 :—

“ It is almost safe to assert that the flies of each succeeding generation remain around about the trees whose fruits afford the food necessary for the maggot; and from this it might be inferred that if fruit-growing became an industry in Bermuda, the planting of orchards of mixed fruit-trees is to be particularly avoided, unless growers are prepared to keep the ground under the trees perfectly clear of weeds, and to collect and destroy promptly all fallen fruit.

“Though the great variety of fruiting-trees growing here is insufficient to furnish propagating media for hies throughout the whole year, each successive generation making use of a different kind of fruit, without doubt the Surinam cherry (Eugenia Michili) has been the most potent factor in perpetuating the pest. There are two main crops of fruit, one in the spring and another in the fall, but stragglers between each cause the two crops to overlap.

“The loquats (Eriobotrya japónica), ripening in February and March, are used by the fruit-flies of the year, from the puparia that have lived dormant in the ground during the two coldest months, and the larvre hatched from the eggs of these flies begin to pupate before the loquats are all over. In some instances this year, where the fruit had been pecked by birds and had shrivelled on the trees, complete pupae were found within the fruit. At the end of April and during May, the peach, cherry, oranges (both sweet and sour), lemons and limes, Barbados gooseberry, and capsicums bring forth another crop of maggots that, after pupation, are just in time for the sapo-dillas in June and July. Following these are the mangoes, coffee, sweet peppers, cherries again, avacado pears, guavas, sugar apples, cherimoyas, quinces, coco-plum, granadilla?, and star apples, which serve as propagating media until the final resting brood goes to earth during December.

“The general plan has been to collect and destroy all the mature fruits of all kinds known to be punctured throughout the country ; and in such cases, where trees bearing large numbers of small fruit are too numerous, about 90 per cent, have been pruned back to prevent their producing fruit during the next fruiting season ; by doing this it is possible to collect all the fruits produced by the trees that were left unpruned last season.

“ The fruits were collected in sacks, weighted by inserting a big stone before closing the bag, and thrown into the sea. In a few instances it proved more convenient to burn or boil the fruits.

“The work was begun as soon as possible after the Act came into force. Ten sets of tools were purchased, and an inspector was appointed for each of the nine parishes, and the inspectors were supplied with labourers as necessity demanded.”

In reply to my request for further information, Mr. Harris sent me a copy of their Act and an interesting letter, part of which I extract. He says :—

“ We are working here in Bermuda on the assumption that the female fly dies after all its eggs have been laid, and that if we carefully collect the fruits as soon as the eggs are laid in them, we get at the root of the trouble. We had already, last year, reduced the number of fruit-trees about to just a few in each parish, and these are. being kept under close observation. At this time (1st March) last year there were, I should say, several millions of loquat fruits teeming with maggots and the fruit rotting on the ground. This year the observation trees that were permitted to fruit have proved to us that we are working on the right lines. Of about 100 trees we left to fruit in the whole country, about seventy have matured their fruits without a single puncture, while the remainder have had less than 50 per cent, punctured once or twice, and these have all been collected. For the last fifty years the peaches have begun to ooze sap when they were as large as marbles; this year, now, the trees are laden with fruit as large as hen’s eggs and not a single one punctured.

“We were careful, you see, not to destroy all the fruit, fearing that the fly went about and punctured things unknown to us ; they appear to find their way to the observation trees, but I am of opinion that they do not, as a rule, travel very far ; indeed, I had come to that conclusion last summer, that if one orchardist were to collect and destroy all diseased fruit and his neighbours did not, his neighbours’ flies would not go over the fence unless they were blown over by the wind. We had at the end of last summer sapodillas (Achras sopota) and anonas quite free of maggots, and also a few late peaches.

“ I have at the garden two large loquat trees near some old peach trees ; all are in full fruit, the peaches quite large and no sign of a puncture, while the loquats show 50 per cent, with just one deposit of eggs each. 1 have caught and killed five flies on the two trees—the last a week ago,—and now there are no more; have gathered all the ‘stung’ fruit and am leaving the rest to ripen. The hies appear to prefer ripe loquats to unripe peaches, for the branches of both trees intermingle yet the peaches are not punctured.

“ I notice also that the punctured spots contain from two to five eggs this year, whereas lasb year at this time as many as twelve and fourteen were found in each hole, while each fruit was punctured in as many as twenty places.

“It is very evident also that the flies go about ‘stinging’ the fruit som time after all the eggs are laid, for many of the single punctures contain no eggs at all, yet the flesh of the fruit is killed at that point, the dead portion being As of an inch wide and ^ deep. Can you say what the poison is 1

The first record of Ceratitis capitata in Australia was made by Fuller (Journal of the Bureau of Agriculture, W.A., February, 1897). Later on he stated that it was first observed at Guildford in October and bT_-> ember of the previous year infesting limes, afterwards in apricots, and towards the end of the year in peaches, nectarines, and tigs. In the March number of the same journal he gave a good p>late of the fly and its life-history. Tryon in the meantime received specimens from Western Australia, and determined it as the well-known fruit pest of the Mediterranean (C. cajñtata). In the following year (1898) French wrote to me from Melbourne stating that he had bred this fly from peaches imported into Victoria from Sydney, and a few days later I was surprised to find a number of the identical species flying about in the breeding-jars in my laboratory, breeding from fruit that was supposed to be infected with Queensland fruit-fly. As we were all on the lookout for this fruit pest at the time, there can be no doubt about the time of its arrival in Sydney. It was established in Western Australia nearly two years before it was discovered in Sydney ; at that time a good deal of citrus fruit was being imported into Australia vid Italy, though some of it was brought in the first instance from the African coast and reshipped from Naples. At that time, too, fruit-fly was common in the African oranges, and also in southern Italy and Sicily. Therefore there is very strong evidence that we got it from European countries ; and though we may have had it direct from Western Australia, it is just as likely that it was brought to us by fruit in one of the mail steamers. The popular name, “ Mediterranean Fruit Fly,” was first used by me (“ Notes on Fruit-maggot Flies, with descriptions of New Species,” Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales) to distinguish it from the northern species, which we call the Queensland Fruit Fly” (Dacus Tryoni).

This fly has spread all through the citrus orchards of New South Wales to a greater or less extent, but until a few years ago was unknown in the southern parts of this State and the adjoining State of Victoria. At the present time, however, it is found in orchards at Albury and in quite a number of Victorian orchards, where it has become more or less established.

For a long time it was believed that it was not to be found in Queensland ; and though, from what I can learn, it is not common, yet it is found in Queensland fruit, and I have specimens from Brisbane. Though it has been introduced into Tasmania several times in damaged fruit, it has not gained a footing in that State; and South Australia is to be congratulated on keeping this pest out of its boundaries. In Western Australia, in the vicinity of Perth and all through the citrus orchards, it is as great a pest to fruit-growing as in the similar climate of New South Wales.

In New Zealand, according to their last Annual Report (1907), this fruit-fly has been introduced into that country on several occasions, and was established to the extent that fruit grown in Napier and sent to another part of New Zealand produced a large crop of Mediterranean fruit-flies. There is, however, without doubt a climate limit to the spread and development of this pest, even though it may appear in considerable numbers under particularly favourable conditions for one season, as it did in the neighbourhood of Paris in 1906, as described by Professor A. Giard.

From inquiries I made in Paris from Professor Marchel, it is evident that they did not become properly established, for they were not a pest the following year.

Ceratitis capitata) in the first place, is a citrus fruit pest, but as it has spread has learnt to feed upon all kinds of fruits ; and after the orange may be known as a peach pest. At the present time there is hardly any kind of fruit that it has not been bred from, so that any list of infested fruit is quite superfluous. In fact, they have been bred from a number of native fruits ; but the native fruits are so rare, comparatively speaking, in the greater part of the fruit-growing districts of Australia, that they are not an important factor in the spread of the pest, and are more likely to be infested themselves from an adjacent orchard than to be a centre of infection to the orchard. Ceratitis capitata has been described in a more or less imperfect manner a great many times, but is better known from the beautiful coloured figures, published by Macleay, and again by Brême, when he called it C. hispánica. As several new species have been added to the members of this genus, and some confusion exists about the identity of the earlier described species, I propose not to give a scientific description but a popular one, that anyone can grasp with the insect before them.

Size, 4 to 5 mm., about the size of an average house-fly, but looking somewhat smaller when dead, because the body shrinks up beneath the thorax. General colour, ochreous yellow, lighter on the sides of thorax and basal joints of the antennæ. The eyes of the usual reddish purple tint, with a blackish blotch in the centre of the forehead, from which spring two stout black bristles, a fine fringe of similar bristles round the hind margin of the head, with some coarser ones curving round in front of the head between the eyes. The thickened basal joints of the antennæ pale yellow, the terminal segments black to the tips. The dorsal surface of the thorax convex, raised, and broadly rounded with the scutellum, the ground colour creamy white to yellow, marbled with shining black blotches forming an irregular mosaic pattern, the lighter portions clothed with very fine white bristles. These light-coloured bristles more lightly scattered over the dark areas, and the whole bearing large stout black bristles thickest on the black surface.

In many of the pictures of this insect the black areas are drawn as if they were projecting bosses or knobs, but this is incorrect ; the whole forms a regular rounded surface.

The wings are broad, semi-opaque, with the extreme base blotched with ochreous or brownish yellow, with the rest of the basal area curiously marked with black, forming dark lines of the radiating nervures, with dark lines and spots between ; beyond this is a broad irregular transverse ochreous band, slightly lined with black, blotched at the extremity ; another similar shaped and coloured blotch runs along inside but not in contact with the costal nervure, also black towards the extremity in the angular space. Between these bands is another shorter black band running parallel with the first transverse band.

The oval abdomen is clothed on the upper surface with fine, scattered black bristles, and has two rather broad transverse silvery white bands on the basal half of the body. The male differs from the female in being furnished with a pair of stalked appendages standing out in front of the head in a line with the front margin of the eyes, the extremities of which filaments are produced into spatulate appendages, black, finely striated, and diamond shaped.

The living fly is an active little creature, running about over the foliage or fruit on the trees, with its wings drooping down on the sides of the body. When disturbed it has a short flight, seldom flying more than a few yards at the most, and it often returns to the same spot.

Ceratitis punctata, Wiedemann.

(.Trypeta punctata, Wiedemann, Analecta Entomol., 1824, p. 55, n. 123; Ausseurop. Zweiflugel Insecten, 2 Till., 1830, 485, 15. Ceratitis punctata, Yon Roder, Berl. Entomol Zeitschrift, 29 Jahry, 133, 2.)

Examining the Bigot collection (Mr. G. H. Verrall’s), I found one specimen under this name which had the dorsal surface spotted, very like that of C. capitata.

In the Royal Museum of Hungary there is a specimen under this name, which has a uniform grey tint on the dorsal surface. The wing neuration as in C. capitata, at the base, but very irregularly barred on the apical portion. The dorsal surface of the thorax showing the same shining black areas, but in this specimen they appeared to form irregular raised bosses. It was labelled “ German West Africa.”

Ceratitis Bremii, Guerin.

(Rev. Zook, 1843, p. 199.)

General colour pale yellow, with the under surface of the thorax shaded with reddish, the whole insect covered with very close whitish-yTellow pubescence, the colour of the sides. The scutellum black at the base, whitish-yellow in front, bordered with bright yellow behind, with longitudinal lines of the same bright yellow, which thus forms three large black square blotches. The wings resemble those of Ceratitis cattoirei, but showing only one oblique band of brown towards the lower edge of the wing, between the middle band and the side band, yellow from the side to the middle, transverse—and not in contact with the other bands.

Abdomen pale yellow, uniformly clothed with fine whitish-grey pubescence with scattered black bristles on the sides and apex ; legs pale yellow.

Length, 5 mm. Habitat—Senegal, Africa. One female specimen, collected by Captain Meon,

Ceratitis dentipes, Guérin.

(Rev. Zool., 1843, p. 200.)

The following account is translated from Guerin’s description of this fly, which he appears to have placed in this genus, not because he was certain it belonged to it, but because he did not quite know where to place it.

In the Verrall collection there is a specimen labelled Ceratitis dentipes, Macq., which may be the type, as it is marked Port Jackson. There is only the head and wing remaining on the pin, but the latter is very different in its markings, which form lines and circles at the base, with a characteristic reddish-yellow triangular blotch clouded with black in the centre of the wing.

Guérin says :—“ This curious species will probably become the type of a new genus, on account of the singular projection on its head, which does not resemble the horns of the male Ceratitis. However, we have not judged it necessary to establish one for a single species of which we have only one specimen, and have, therefore, placed it in the genus Ceratitis, to which it shows the most characters. In case it is judged necessary to separate that insect generally, we propose to give to that group the name of Lenophita (lenos, fruit; philos, I love). Head pale yellowish-red, very bright on the sides or the cheeks, a line beside the eyes, and the posterior part of the sides of the thorax pale yellowish-white. On each side of the vertex beside the eyes is a black blotch, which unites at the back with a larger blotch on the posterior side of the head ; the space occupied by the ocelli very black ; the ocelli very prominent, reddish-brown. The front of the epistome black with pale reddish sides ; the antennæ pale reddish yellow, like the front of the head, the bristles brown, and slightly downy. In the middle of the face, immediately below the insertion of the antennæ, is a sort of horn or membraneous plate, smaller than the surface, compressed between the eyes, almost square in form, turned up at the anterior edge, and of a pale reddish-yellow colour. The exposed part of the palpi is pale red, and the horn blackish-brown. The thorax is of a uniform shining black, but ought to have had blotches or grey lines, for one still perceives some traces of grey hairs on the less exposed parts. The scutellum very large, globular, and rounded like the other species of Ceratitis, but without blotches ; the sides of the dorsal surface shining black, and show, by the remains of fine hairs, that they have, perhaps, been thus clothed when the insect was fresh. The wings hyaline, with blackish nervures ; those at the base are widened, with their spaces marked with blotches and little black lines as one sees only in the Ceratitis ; beyond the spotted area and little before the middle, there is a large transverse band of blackish-brown, bent at the side, and carrying a second oblique band, which just reaches the lower margin, between the first band and the summit of the wing ; there is, further' at extreme tip of the wing, a brown band which parts from two-thirds the length of the wing and along the upper edge to the extremity. The abdomen is triangular, of a bluish-black tint, with trausverse bands of soft grey hairs. Legs brown, with the knees and the first two or three joints of the tarsi yellow ; the hind legs thick at the base, without spines on the inside of the external extremity, with two large tubercules or rounded teeth.

This specimen of the male sex is 6 k millimetres in length. It has been given to us as coming from Port Jackson, New Holland (now Sydney, New South Wales).

The Mauritius Fruit Fly.

Ceratitis catoirei, Guerin.

(Rev. Zool., 1843, p. 197.)

In a paper entitled a1 ‘ Monograph d un Gene de Muscides nomme Ceratitis,’ Guérin describes all the known species of the genus at that date, and adds several new species, among which is this species. The following is a translation of Guerin’s description :—

“ Head antennæ and face of a pale yellow colour, the horn (spatulate tipped bristle ?) of the male inserted at the anterior extremity of a little oblong tubercle near the eyes, a little longer than the head, and terminating into a spatulate process of a triangular shape, or truncate at the tip. Thorax black, shining on the dorsal surface, with fine white-grey transverse ridges above on the front edge, formed of a very fine close pubescence broken into the middle, with two large black spots, showing on the other hand near the hind margin a transverse line and trident-shaped mark of golden yellow. Scutelium shining black, globular, ornamented near the base with a line like the preceding one, but much deeper and sinuous ; posterior edge of the metathorax below the scutelium covered with lines of fine white silvery pubescence. Wings hyaline, with a slight touch of yellow on the nervures, the points black at the base ; a large transverse yellow band edged with blackish, side by side, and stained with black spots from the middle to the tip, and from the side of the inner edge a brown band goes obliquely towards the side, and then bending before reaching there, in order to reunite at the middle of the band : between it and the costal band there is a little patch of the same coloui moie bruised and mottled.

Abdomen of a very bright yellow, with the base and posterior edge of the first segment and the posterior half of the third segment silvery white, produced by a very fine silvery pubescence. Legs, bright yellow, hairy ; the forelegs fringed with fine hairs, yellow, almost orange.

In the female the vertex is pale yellow, slightly brighter than the front part of the head ; the extremities of two slight tubercles, which are near the eyes, carry a strong spiny-black bristle, resembling the other stout bristles on the head in both sexes. The wings resemble those of the male, but have the brown blotches more pronounced.

Length—Male, 5 to 6 mm. ; female, 6-7 mm.

Habitat—Mauritius.

There is a specimen of a male under the name of Ceratitis catoirei in the Verrall Collection determined by Bigot that I examined, which has the abdomen more silvery than C. capitata, and has the spatulate tipped bristles on the forehead well developed, but the terminal tips, instead of being diamond-shape, were truncate at the tips.

Habitat—Isles Bourbon and Mauritius.

This species was first collected by Mr. Cattoire on the Isle de France (Mauritius). He sent them to several entomologists and to W. S. Macleay, who confounded them with the species he described as C. citriperda. Guérin-Méneville, however, obtained several specimens, and among them some males, which decided him that it was a distinct species, so die named it after the discoverer. Macleay spells the name Cattoire, but Guérin spells it Catoire.

Ceratitis (?) penicillata, Bigot.

(Annals Soc. Ent., France, Yol. XL., p. 308, 1891.)

“Length, 4 mm. Male. Antennæincomplete.”

Notwithstanding the mutilation of the antennæ and the absence, probably accidental, of the frontal appendages, the face and other characters seem to demonstrate that this insect is certainly a Ceratitis, so that it seems best to consider it the type of a new species.

Basal segments of the antennæ pale red (the third wanting), face front and cheeks whitish ; a large brown quadrangular spot on the epistome. Thorax whitish-grey, marked with four indistinct brownish lines ; scutellum whitish, marked at the posterior edge with three black shining points ; abdomen greyish-white with the base of the segments blackish, halteres whitish. The first two pair of legs yellowish-white, the apex of the thighs of the forelegs brown, with the thighs on the upper surface clothed with some incurved black bristles in the second pairof legs, the middle of the thighs, and the extremity of the tibiæ lightly stained with brown ; the hind legs of the same colour as the middle legs, but have the tibiæ fringed inwardly to the extremity with some long stiff black bristles a little flattened and dense. The wings are whitish, with some black points showing at the base, and five others disposed along the fourth and fifth longitudinal nervures, the wings further ornamented with four large reddish transverse bands, the first near to the base, the second through the middle, the third longitudinal to the outer edge and joining the second, to touch the other part, the tip of the wing ; the fourth and last placed on the second transverse nervure and extending to the edge, until a little beyond the nervure.

The Natal Fruit Fly.

(PL VIII, fig. 19.)

Ceratitis rubivora, Coquillet.

(Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, Vol. XXIV, p. 29, No. 1,243,

1901.)

“ Head yellowish, a grey spot streaked with black above the neck and sending a wide stripe to each eye, a black ocellar dot; mouth parts and antennae yellow, the arista short plumose, brown, the base yellow, antennae three-fourths as long as the face, front in both sexes bearing only normal bristles, thorax yellowish-brown, largely greyish pruinose, mesonotum marked on each side with a broad, interrupted, black, polished stripe and with three narrow, indistinct, black, median lines which at their posterior ends expand so as to meet each other; between this point and the scutellum is a transverse pair of polished, whitish spots, humeri whitish, upper part of mesopleura yellow ; scutellum yellow, the outer margin marked with three black spots, metonotum polished black, crossed in the middle by a broad transverse, opaque,greyish pruinose fascia emarginate in the middle of the lower edge, two yellow spots on each side of the metathorax; abdomen yellowish, the third and fifth segments, except a large triangular spot in the middle of each, black ; wings hyaline, a brown cross-band on a line with the humeral cross-vein, followed by about ten brown dots, a second brown cross-band, yellowish in the vicinity of the small cross-vein, extends from the costa beyond apex of auxiliary vein to apex of the sixth, including the small cross-vein in its outer portion; a brown stripe, yellowish in the central part, extends close to the costa from beyond apex of first vein to beyond apex of the third, its margins marked with four or five darker brown dots ; an elongated, oblique, brown spot on the fourth vein before its apex, and a larger one bordering the hind cross vein : legs yellow, in the male the front femora marked with a black streak on the upper and another on the posterior side, middle femora on the broad apex, except a streak on the anterior side and the extreme apex, black j hind femora with a black spot before apex of urtdei side prolonged as a streak in the middle of the anterior side , middle tibia*, except the extreme ends, black \ in the male the under side of middle femora on the apical half, also the inner and outer sides of the middle tibiae, densely fringed with long flattened bristles halteres yellowish ; ovipositor of female greatly flattened, the basal piece as long as the last two abdominal segments. Length, 4 to 5 mm.

Type in the United States National Museum. Specimens collected at Wynberg, Cape Colony, South Africa.

Specimens of this fruit-fly were sent to Coquillet by C. P. Lounsbury, from Cape Colony, to be identified, or described if new. He returned the co-types to Mr. Lounsbury, who has very kindly presented me with specimens.

This fly is about the same size as Ceratatis capitatcr, but of a general lighter brown tint; the dark markings on the dorsal surface of the thorax wanting, or only showing faint traces on the hind half ; while the scutellum is very prominent with a large square black mark in the centre, and a smaller rounded one on either side. The apex of the thorax is more silvery, and the two bands round the abdomen are more grey than mauve. The stout black bristles on the head and thorax are much more numerous, and the wings are somewhat different, as will be seen on comparing the drawings on plate 5.

The curious spatulate face appendages are not present in the male of this species.

From the description and figures given by Fuller in his First Report of the Government Entomologist of Natal, 1899-1900, page 70, and Second Report, 1901, page 20, it is evident that this is the common species in Natal, though in his report it is identified as Ceratitis corysa, Walker. According to Yon Ruder the species described by Walker as Trypeta cosyra is identical with our Ceratitis capitata, so that Coquillet’s name will stand. Fuller says : “ This insect ranks a good first among fruibpests of Natal. It is impossible to say whether it is an introduction into the country or not. It has been known upon the coast belt as far back, I believe, as old colonists can remember, and is simply credited by them with being worse nowadays than then. It is only during the last twenty to thirty years, however, that it has been known at Maritzburg. It ranges up the coast about 150 miles, and is said to be spreading all over the colony. It infests all kinds of cultivated fruits, and several native wild fruits.”

Note.—Lounsbury since tells me that he does not consider these species identical; and also that while C. rubivora is only bred from blackberries, C. corysa infests all fruits.

48531 d

Cerataiis lycii, Coquillet.

(Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, Yol. XXIY, p. 30,

No. 1,243, 1901.)

“ Head yellow, a black spot above the neck, sending a branch to each eye, a black spot in the middle of upper part of face ; antennae yellow, three-fourths as long as the face, proboscis brown, the palpi yellow, body black, mesonotum opaque greyish pruinose, the margin produced inward at the front and hind angles, and in the middle in front, also a pair of round dots behind the suture, polished; a spot on the humerus uniting with a broad stripe on upper edge of pleura, also a sinuous, interrupted line at base of scutellum, light yellowish ; abdomen polished, the posterior portion of the first and third segments opaque, whitish pruinose, remainder of third segment opaque, brownish pruinose; ovipositor flat beneath, convex above, the basal portion as long as the last two abdominal segments; wings hyaline, a broad brown cross-band in a line with humeral cross-vein, followed by three or four longitudinal brown streaks and about nine brown dots, a second brown cross-band extends from beyond apex of auxiliary vein to apex of last vein, at the costa united with a broad brown stripe that extends along the costa to midway between apices of third and fourth veins, filling the costal margin to the third vein, and near middle of last section of the latter, sending a branch obliquely to the wing margin below apex of fourth vein ; the second cross-band also sends a branch from the small cross-vein obliquely to the apex of fifth vein, covering the hind cross-vein ; the costal margin is very narrowly hyaline between apices of the first and third veins, except a pair of brown dots between apices of first and second veins; extreme base of wings yellowish; legs, including the front coxae, yellow. Length, 4 mm.’ Type in the United States National Museum (No. 5,791). Described from specimens from Cape Colony, South Africa.

Ceratitis rosa, Karsch.

(Entomologische Nachrichten, Yol. XIII, p. 22, 1887.)

“ Shining black, with brownish-yellow hairs; thorax with two shining black spots on the subdorsal sides; the sides of the sternum yellow; scutellum shining black, transversal line on the base and four longitudinal lines dull orange yellow, with transverse lines on the abdomen; with shining black spot on the dull yellow face, antennae and legs yellow, the tibia of the mid legs clothed with fine bluish-black scale-like hairs along the edges.

Length, 5 mm. Habitat—Delagoa Bay, Africa.

At Mr. G. H. Yerrall’s, when examining the Bigot Collection, I found one specimen under this name which had the body much lighter coloured than in C. capitata, the wings much more spotted along the costal margin, the black coloration on the scutellum forming four black spots. It was labelled Natal, South Africa, and appeared to be distinct from C. rubivora of Coquillet.

Ceratitis striata, n.sp.

(PI. Yin, fig. 17.)

Length, 5 to 6 mm. General colour pale yellow to greyish, with the upper

\

surface of the thorax variegated with black. Wings hyaline, marked with fine black lines and spots on the basal portion, with a broad parallel dull yellow band along the costa from the apex of the black markings, and curving well round the apex of the wing; from this run two broad and one narrow irregular transverse bands crossing the wing, so that with the curve of the tip it appears to have four transverse bars; both the parallel stripe and transverse bands slightly clouded with fuscous. Head of male without the curious spatulate tipped hairs of C. capitata, eyes dark, face unspotted but lightly marked with brown above the antennae, a dark spot on the summit, clothed with coarse scattered black bristles. Thorax elongate, stained with chestnut brown in front on dorsal surface, the rest greyish, with the shining black areas not so compact as in C. capitata, and forming three very irregular black parallel bars, the outer ones thickest : the scutellum shining black, slightly mottled behind, and below it on the apex of the thorax black; the whole of the thorax lightly clothed with stout black bristles, of which two long ones spring out from the hind edge of the scutellum ; the legs pale yellow, with stout spine-like hairs on the femora and rows of very fine short spines down the angles of the tibiae. Abdomen broadly rounded in the male, that of the female produced into a long pointed sheath at the anal segment; greyish, very indistinctly banded, covered with fine hairs, with a few scattered bristles, forming a tuft of four or five at the tip.    Habitat—

Peradenyia Gardens, Ceylon.

When examining the insect collections of Mr. E. E. Green, Government Entomologist at the Royal Botanic Gardens at Peradenyia, I came across a series of fruit-flies with No. 1,166 attached to them, and on Mr. West turning up the records we found the following note under this number :— “ Bred from the decaying shoots of bamboo, Peradenyia, 1903.” There was a fine series of both male and female specimens, though somewhat mouldy.

I propose the name striata on account of the black markings on the thorax forming irregular bands, and also the markings on the basal portion of the wings being more striate than spotted.

The Baluchistan Melon Fly,

Carpomyia pardalina, Bigot.

(Indian Museum Notes, Vol. II, No. 7, 1891-93, p. 51.)

This curious fly, which is very closely allied to the Mediterranean fruit-fly, was discovered and bred by Mr. J. Cleghorn, who found them in Peshin at an elevation of 5,000 feet, where they were infesting the young melons and were most injurious toward the end of summer. He gives a very interesting account (“ Miscellaneous Notes, Indian Museum,” page 24, Yol. II) of its life-history, and says he is of opinion that the hard winters kill the majority of the hibernating pupre, so that it is after a mild winter that the insect is chiefly abundant.

The following is a translation of Bigot’s technical description of this fly, specimens of which I examined in the Calcutta Museum :—“ Length, male 4| mm., female 54 mm. with the ovipositor. Eyes brilliant, bronzy green ; head with antennae, proboscis, and palpi pale fawn colour, long bristles, blackish, the antennal bristle black with white at the base. Thorax pale fawn, front of the thorax with two very narrow reddish lines, behind whitish, with four large shiny black rounded projecting spots on each side of the dorsal surface; the scutellum with three large spots situated on the side, and one small median blotch all alike; the long bristles black ; legs pale fawn colour, thighs of forelegs rather thickened, with several brownish hair3 beneath. Abdomen pale fawn colour, the base of the segments greyish, brown. Wings hyaline, with three large fawn transverse bands, the one at the extremity divided into a V, of which the outward branch turns round the tip of the wing ; all the margins of the bands greyish, particularly the one at the tip of the wing.

“ Female resembling the male, with the ovipositor reddish, short, and blunt.”

According to Maxwell Lefroy (“ Indian Insect Pests,” 1906), its life-history has been worked out in the Report of Lala Vishwa, Entomological Assistant, Punjab.

Genus—Trypeta, Meigon.

(Illigers Magazin, Yol. II, p. 277, 1803.)

This genus contains a number of very handsome flies remarkable for the rich coloration of their wings and bright-coloured eyes. In many species they have the body clothed with scattered more or less stout blackish bristles, and very little pubescence. The larvie live in vegetable matter, the female by means of her pointed ovipositor depositing her eggs in the tissue of the plant and a number of them produce curious galls. There are a number of species peculiar to Australia, and two species are known as fruit pests.

The Mexican Fruit Fly.

(PL VI, fig. 12.)

Trypeta hidens, Loew.

(Monograph of the Diptera of North America. Part III. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., No. 256. Washington, 1873, p. 223, PI. XI, fig. 19.)

This fruit-fly was known many years ago among the Mexican fruit-growers as an orchard pest, attacking the orange, mango, guava, and other fruits. It appears to be a native of Mexico, but its exact home has never been decided.

Until the growing of oranges became a profitable industry and an export trade sprang up in the United States, little or no notice was taken of its presence. In 1897, Dr. L. O. Howard, in the Year-book of the United States Department of Agriculture, called the attention of the American orchardists to the danger of introducing such a serious pest into the orange orchards of California with infested fruit. The result was, that in 1900 the Commissioner of the State Board of Horticulture in California brought an Act into existence prohibiting the importation of Mexican oranges into California, in consequence of having found infested oranges in their State, shipped from the port of Acupulco ; and he gave instructions that any consignments coming from any part of Mexico should at once be destroyed. This action raised a storm of indignation among the Mexican growers and their Government; the former declared that it was simply a case of protection of the home market for the Californian orchardists.

In 1905, Mr. John Isaacs was sent by the Governor of California to investigate the range and state of the fruit-fly in Mexico, and accompanied by Professor A. S. Herrera (Commissioner de Parasitologia), he visited all the chief centres of the orange industry. His report on the Mexican Orange Worm (Trypeta ludens), with many illustrations, and a map of the infested States, was published by the State Board of Horticulture in California on his return. The restrictions as regards California were not removed, but the Mexican oranges were allowed admission into the Eastern States, though the high protective tariff on oranges imposed by the United States Customs makes it almost prohibitive.

This was one of the fruit-flies that I was particularly anxious to see and investigate, as it was an orange pest in the first instance, though, like most fruit-flies, it incidentally infests other fruit when numerous.

On my arrival in Mexico, the first thing I did was to see the authorities at the Department of Agriculture, examine all their specimens, and obtain all the information they had regarding their habits, range, and the methods enforced to keep them in check. Through the kindness of Professor A. S. Herrera, Chief of the Bureau de Parasitologia, and Dr. Giandra, the Pathologist, I obtained much valuable information. Both these gentlemen were very emphatic regarding the uselessness of the parasite (Cratosipla rudibunda), which was figured and described in the Californian Report, as a check upon this fly. I had previously received specimens of this little red wasp from Professor Koebele, which he had bred from infested mangoes from the Mexican market the year before.

This fruit-fly, about lines in length, is of a general dull ochreous yellow colour, with large hyaline wings mottled and striped with brownish-yellow bands, forming a very irregular pattern, as seen in the figure of the wing given. The female is remarkable for the great elongation of the anal segment of the abdomen, which is considerably longer than the rest of the abdominal segments combined. As far as I know, it is not recorded from any other country, but has an extended range over the fruit-growing districts of Mexico.

The island Fruit Fly.

(PI. Ill, figs. 1, 2, and 3.)

Trypeta musce, Froggatt.

(,Agricultural Gazette, jY.S. IF., June, 1899, p. 501, PI. II, figs. 1 and 2.

Miscellaneous Publications Dep. Agriculture, N.S.W., No. 303.)

In the original description the numbers on the plate were transposed, but the species are very distinct.

The maggots of this fly were on several occasions obtained from condemned bananas coming in shipments of fruit from the New Hebrides. The maggots are easily distinguished from the Queensland species by the different colour and form of the anal respiratory tubes, which are black and small at the orifice. The fully-developed maggot is larger, and of a darker colour, the pupse lighter yellow, and somewhat more rounded in form.

Within the last few years this species has been introduced into Queensland, where it is quite common in cultivated fruit; and last year (1908) Mr. Gurney bred quite a number in the Gosford district from various fruits.

It is allied to Trypeta bicolor, Macq., a species peculiar to Australia, and which I have collected on the wing in the Bathurst district, New South Wales; but it is a much lighter-coloured fly, with the wings more lightly clouded.

This fly measures three lines in length, and has a wing expanse of 6 lines. The head is small, ochreous, with dark eyes, and the whole of the upper surface covered with stout, black bristles, which extend over the dorsal surface of the thorax ; the antennae yellow, with a long bristle standing out from the apex of the second joint, the terminal joint short and rounded.

PLATE III.

The thorax is brownish-yellow, rounded in front, broad to the base of the wings, and sloping round to the scutellum, which is rounded in front, produced into a spine on either side of the hind margin. The legs lightish-brown, with the tarsal spines, claws, and tibial spines of the hind legs black. Wings hyaline at base, with all the upper half black to dark brown, with an irregular hyaline blotch on the costal nervure extending to the subcostal cell ; two small, rounded, hyaline spots on each side below, and mottle-brown clouding in the lower cells. The abdomen is small, light brown at base, black on the apical half, covered with coarse hairs.

Habitat—New Hebrides, Queensland, and New South Wales.

Note.—Through the experiments carried out at Narara by Mr. Gurney it has been discovered that this fly breeds in the native fruits in that district, and is particularly abundant in the “ Black Apple ” (A chris australe). Within the last month (February) I have bred it from the same wild fruit collected at Thirroul, south of Sydney, so that it has a wide range along the coast. It is also very doubtful if this species ever punctures perfectly sound orchard fruit. All the evidence gained by Mr. Gurney and myself after close observation in the orchard for the last six months, tends to the conclusion that unless a fruit has a bruise, blemish, or has been previously punctured by some other insect, it is not touched by the Island Fruit-fly.

The Apple Maggot.

(PI. II, figs. 1, 2, and 3.)

Rhayoletes (Trypeta) pomonella, Walsh.

(American Journal of Horticulture, December, 1867, p. 338.)

This is a well-known apple pest in the eastern portion of the United States and Canada wherever apples are grown, and among the orchardists is popularly known as the “ Railroad Worm,” on account of the regular winding tracks it makes when eating its way through the tissue of the infested apple. It is a native of North America, and its original food was the wild haws, and, probably, crab-apples, so that the cultivated apple is an acquired habit. It has been recorded from England, to which country it has probably been introduced with fruit from America, but is hardly a pest in the former country

Nearly all the writers upon economic entomology in North America have written upon this pest. In the Annual Report of Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, 1890, Professor L. F. Harvey gives the results of his investigations into its life-history in the years 1888-9. In the Report of the Experimental Farms at Ottawa, 1898, Dr. James Fletcher says that it is a serious pest in Canada ; and in the State of Vermont as much as half the crop is often destroyed.

In Circular No. 101 of the United States Bureau of Entomology (1908) A. L. Quaintance gives a very interesting account of this apple pest in the United States, where he compiles all the latest information about its spread and the damage caused by its ravages.

Description of perfect fly : Length of body, lines; expanse of wings, 4 lines. The eyes are black, with the antennae, face, forelegs, and the tibiae and tarsi of the hind legs ochreous. The thorax is black, with white markings on the sides of the prothorax, beneath the wings, and the scutellum white ; the centre of the thorax clothed with grey pubescence ; the head and thorax covered with stout, scattered bristles ; the thighs and base of tibiae of the fore and hind pair of legs black. The hyaline wings are deeply banded with oblique transverse bands of black; the black abdomen covered with fine hairs, which form grey bands along the apical margin of each segment.

Sydney : William Anplegatc Gullick, Government Printer.—1909.

Fig. 1.

Daevs Tryoni.


Fig. 2. Dacus oJeœ.


Fig. 4.

Dacus French/.


Fig. 9

Dacus immaculat u.s

Fig. 10.

Dacus Lounsburyi


Fig. 11.

Dacus cequalis.




Fig. 13.

ijacus ornaiissim us.


Fig. 15.

Da eus curvipennis.


Da eus ornatissimus.

WINGS AND BODIES OF FRUIT FLIES.


Dacus curvipennis.

Fin. I

Cera tifi s capitata.

Fie. 10

Ceratilis rubivora

■/- ■

■'V    ,:    ..." ; - y: 4> ■•"...    Ä -V-'.-    -v

•'-■>•    ■' tí >::■<■: : v by.y.---y y    váSftí.-:. • '-ÀS& • • *- -S-. .../■I* H&-

¿V * V1 ’    . 1 ■■» ç    ^ r S:^:    &&. .** ■ £tè, '?%%&& V y-'‘ ‘ *

'. V-


-y1

J§l

m - .v

2$ 7¿¡¡&t ;    .*>:'M

;-V

Hfe

, > 12

-i;1 -ife-*v;.-fe'fe-feí^ ..-V'i¿'<~"'* T'..'«V-'*-^.t’'-'*'V

'*'€.¥" > -

gsi®

"fe " ife*    fe ‘:fe

-

-: ■ - '>ss----rx- r

■ ' - -y-' “r';-.-';' fe*.

: -^:-.r?..: ■;:    ^ - -Y-

. >- '-•■    .- • 2    - - -Sii- • i- ¡V V.'

■MiPÌIÉ’?

g fefefefe

..—>    ■    •    -    .    -r- •■■?*-- :

"■: --»•.. ’" -- ’ '•-■'    .'. •••. • •. t-.¿..,." •. . :. f_ tt<.. j, 'fe'5ï

"4¿~. . .: . “    •'• •>*.?-•    • YYY?- ‘. -< - :-: -v-.«-' '.

gjfcljv'

H'-T'- ^ V tT":    T .


^3g|    ¡¡1»^§&plil

-

aSr^S^-i-'s?

-

•tj» Ht - • .'

-- »Je ■ ' 3-is--^* ■ r-.

Sa?t-' ; ' -fefe. IpflSiïS

- . - ,    --    . ;-; ivsfcj -•    . . 7>~ -

V _ 'fefeÄfeC:fe;;^

. . . '    . fe^“ feV'


-


- -fe ••.••/"’ U>x

SESEÉ- •• r X« • •-y

— ■ -’r

'■    ' ï - >*•    - fe -fe ' ¿S§ fefe

fe4 í.feffefeífefe;«

_x£v •'-•»- Afe.'' V.. s*Ä^»    p?- i -•


-.O'fe'.X


•■ V- ==•.■ ' ■    ; > £jä#

fefec ••: ■- -:. ■. ■.;    ; •.    '.; -1


---*;■ - t, - ; fe ^

7    -yx, -c ,

fe ji-

m&ää$e

-    ‘ feC-^ -vfe'^fe“ "' 'fefe4

H- ..^fe-fe. ,fe ^-.fefec--.. ■•■ *&

• -■— - • -i:: ■* , '-'' • ■ • -


-

fr*-*» feffe‘fe feife- -:^^.;:--:fe:v --^ ;:'-    --    ■ -.T, r-: -fc> •• ¿5'-.-1<

• ■ <v. ••i<w;i?^3r:v<r‘iaf^;'- y_    ^^*«8


- feÉ$ír:S .._ $?%fe


- • - - ^ -

•fe:

• V'--:    -

X - \ - ■ í g. V    ^L;3fe ;-

S-fe'^fe-Äfe


:&it    >X~'-lrM.

ifefes^ =


fevafc

- -    -fe .*^' ' ■''//■¿-K''--* ¿‘"v '^as^