Powerline corridors: degraded ecosystems or wildlife havens?

Clarke, Donna J., Pearce, Kate A. and White, John 2006, Powerline corridors: degraded ecosystems or wildlife havens?, Wildlife research, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 615-626, doi: 10.1071/WR05085.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Powerline corridors: degraded ecosystems or wildlife havens?
Author(s) Clarke, Donna J.
Pearce, Kate A.
White, JohnORCID iD for White, John orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-5944
Journal name Wildlife research
Volume number 33
Issue number 8
Start page 615
End page 626
Publisher CSIRO Publishing
Place of publication Collingwood, Vic.
Publication date 2006
ISSN 1035-3712
Summary Management of powerline corridors in Australia has traditionally focused on the complete removal of vegetation using short rotation times owing to the perceived hazard of fire associated with corridor vegetation. Because of the intense management associated with fire hazards, little thought has been given to use of powerline corridors by wildlife. This has resulted in corridors traditionally being viewed as a source of fragmentation and habitat loss within forested ecosystems. We investigated the responses of small mammal communities living in a powerline corridor to management-induced vegetation changes at different successional stages, to determine whether a compromise could be reached between managing corridors for fire and biodiversity. Habitat modelling in the corridor and adjacent forest for three native and one introduced small mammal species demonstrated that species responded to changes in vegetation structural complexity, rather than time-since-management per se. Early seral stages of vegetation recovery after corridor management encouraged the introduced house mouse (Mus domesticus) into corridors and contributed little to biodiversity. Mid-seral-stage vegetation, however, provided habitat for native species that were rare in adjacent forest habitats. As the structural complexity of the vegetation increased, the small mammal community became similar to that of the forest so that corridor vegetation contributed fewer biodiversity benefits while posing an unacceptable fire risk. If ecologically sensitive management regimes are implemented to encourage mid-seral vegetation and avoid complete vegetation removal, powerline corridors have the potential to improve biodiversity. This would maintain landscape connectivity and provide habitat for native species uncommon in the forest while still limiting fuel loads in the corridor.

Language eng
DOI 10.1071/WR05085
Field of Research 050211 Wildlife and Habitat Management
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2006, CSIRO
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30003622

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 29 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 31 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 906 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 08:58:26 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.