Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: the case of Algeria

Tiliouine, Habib, Cummins, Robert A. and Davern, Melanie 2006, Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: the case of Algeria, Social indicators research: an international interdisciplinary journal for quality-of-life measurement, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1-30, doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-2012-2.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: the case of Algeria
Author(s) Tiliouine, Habib
Cummins, Robert A.ORCID iD for Cummins, Robert A. orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-7193
Davern, Melanie
Journal name Social indicators research: an international interdisciplinary journal for quality-of-life measurement
Volume number 75
Issue number 1
Start page 1
End page 30
Publisher Springer Netherlands
Place of publication Dordrecht, Netherlands
Publication date 2006-01
ISSN 0303-8300
1573-0921
Keyword(s) cross-cultural measurement
population wellbeing in Algeria
personal wellbeing
national wellbeing
international wellbeing index
Summary The International Wellbeing Index (IWI) has been developed as a complementary measure to already well-known economic measures, and as a tool for cross-cultural comparisons. It comprises two subscales: the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) and the National Wellbeing Index (NWI). The aims of this paper are two-fold. Firstly, to test the psychometric characteristics of the IWI. Secondly, to study how people of Algeria, a third world country that is yet suffering from a harsch economical and social situation, respond to questions dealing with their own lives and life in their country in general, compared to samples from more developed countries where wellbeing was previously measured. The IWI items were presented to individuals either in a questionnaire form to be self-rated or in interview sessions. The total of 1417 answers were analysed. As was expected, a very low satisfaction on both scales was found, compared to the results that were reported in countries, such as Australia or Hong Kong. Comparisons on the demographic characteristics basis show that women are significantly more satisfied than men with their personal lives, though no differences were found with regard to NWI. Eldest and youngest age groups rated the PWI significantly higher than other age groups. Education groups comparisons showed higher ratings on both subscales in favour of groups with no education and those with university levels. Marginal statistically significant differences were found with regard to the PWI in favour of the higher earning group, but no differences in the NWI. No statistically significant results were found as far as marital status, number of children, and income are concerned. The results add to the evidence of the usefulness of the scale to predict satisfaction of people with their own lives and life in their country. Its psychometric performance was proved to be very high in terms of validity, reliability and sensitivity. The results were interpreted on the light of the Homeostasis Theory and the particular situation of the Algerian society.
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s11205-004-2012-2
Field of Research 170113 Social and Community Psychology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2006, Springer Netherlands
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30009029

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 76 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 87 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 11083 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 13 Oct 2008, 15:49:03 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.