Regional sustainability : how useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale?

Graymore, Michelle L. M., Sipe, Neil G. and Rickson, Roy E. 2008, Regional sustainability : how useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale?, Ecological economics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 362-372, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.002.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Regional sustainability : how useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale?
Author(s) Graymore, Michelle L. M.
Sipe, Neil G.
Rickson, Roy E.
Journal name Ecological economics
Volume number 67
Issue number 3
Start page 362
End page 372
Publisher Elsevier BV
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2008-10-15
ISSN 0921-8009
Keyword(s) sustainability assessment
regional sustainability
sustainability indicators
natural resource management
Summary Sustainability assessment methods are primarily aimed at global, national or state scales. However, modelling sustainability at finer spatial scales, such as the region, is essential for understanding and achieving sustainability. Regions are emerging as an essential focus for sustainability researchers, natural resource managers and strategic planners working to develop and implement sustainability goals. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of current sustainability assessment methods – ecological footprint, wellbeing assessment, ecosystem health assessment, quality of life and natural resource availability – at the regional scale. Each of these assessment methods are tested using South East Queensland (SEQ) as a case study. It was selected because of its ecological and demographic diversity, its combination of coastal and land management issues, and its urban metropolitan and rural farm and non-farm communities. The applicability of each of these methods to regional assessment was examined using an evaluation criteria matrix, which describes the attributes of an effective method and the characteristics that make these methods useful for regional management and building community capacity to progress sustainability. We found that the methods tested failed to effectively measure progress toward sustainability at the regional scale, demonstrating the need for a new method for assessing regional sustainability.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.002
Field of Research 070108 Sustainable Agricultural Development
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2008, Elsevier B.V.
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 105 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 122 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 725 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 14 Aug 2009, 13:53:53 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact