Assessing cost-effectiveness in mental health: helping policy-makers prioritize and plan health services

Vos, Theo, Haby, Michelle M., Magnus, Anne, Mihalopoulos, Cathrine and Andrews, Gavin 2005, Assessing cost-effectiveness in mental health: helping policy-makers prioritize and plan health services, Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 701-712, doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01654.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing cost-effectiveness in mental health: helping policy-makers prioritize and plan health services
Author(s) Vos, Theo
Haby, Michelle M.
Magnus, AnneORCID iD for Magnus, Anne
Mihalopoulos, CathrineORCID iD for Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Andrews, Gavin
Journal name Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
Volume number 39
Issue number 8
Start page 701
End page 712
Total pages 12
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2005
ISSN 0004-8674
Summary Objective: We assessed, from a health sector perspective, options for change that could improve the efficiency of Australia's current mental health services by directing available resources toward 'best practice' cost-effective services.

Method: We summarize cost-effectiveness results of a range of interventions for depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders that have been presented in previous papers in this journal. Recommendations for change are formulated after taking into account 'second-filter criteria' of equity, feasibility of implementing change, acceptability to stakeholders and the strength of the evidence. In addition, we estimate the impact on total expenditure if the recommended mental health interventions for depression and schizophrenia are to be implemented in Australia.

Results: There are cost-effective treatment options for mental disorders that are currently underutilized (e.g. cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression and anxiety, bibliotherapy for depression, family interventions for schizophrenia and clozapine for the worst course of schizophrenia). There are also less cost-effective treatments in current practice (e.g. widespread use of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of established schizophrenia and, within those atypicals, a preference for olanzapine over risperidone). Feasibility of funding mechanisms and training of staff are the main second-filter issues for CBT and family interventions. Acceptability to various stakeholders is the main barrier to implementation of more cost-effective drug treatment regimens. More efficient drug intervention options identified for schizophrenia would cost A$68 million less than current practice. These savings would more than cover the estimated A$36M annual cost of delivering family interventions to the 51% of people with schizophrenia whom we estimated to be eligible and this would lead to an estimated 12% improvement in their health status. Implementing recommended strategies for depression would cost A$121M annually for the 24% of people with depression who seek care currently, but do not receive an evidence-based treatment.

Conclusions: Despite considerable methodological problems, a range of cost-effective and less cost-effective interventions for major mental disorders can be discerned. The biggest hurdle to implementation of more efficient mental health services is that this change would require reallocation of funds between interventions, between disorders and between service providers with different funding mechanisms.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01654.x
Field of Research 111714 Mental Health
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Faculty of Health
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 62 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 72 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 994 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 26 Feb 2010, 07:41:21 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact