•  Home
  • Library
  • DRO home
Submit research Contact DRO

DRO

Are individual differences in temperament of relevance to Gibson's theory of affordances?

Hooley, M. and Crassini, B. 2003, Are individual differences in temperament of relevance to Gibson's theory of affordances?, in ICPA 2003 : Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Perception and Action.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Are individual differences in temperament of relevance to Gibson's theory of affordances?
Author(s) Hooley, M.ORCID iD for Hooley, M. orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-5719
Crassini, B.
Conference name International Conference on Perception and Action (12th : 2003 : Brisbane)
Conference location Brisbane, Qld.
Conference dates 13-18 Jul. 2003
Title of proceedings ICPA 2003 : Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Perception and Action
Editor(s) Treffner, P.
Publication date 2003
Summary The ambitious scope, complexity, and difficulty of Gibson’s project in proposing the theory of affordances are captured nicely by the words of Gibson’s biographer, Ed Reed:
“Gibson was convinced that the theory of affordances, in
conjunction with the concepts of information, persistence, and
change, would enable him to transcend the ancient debate between
subjectivity and objectivity and to resolve the mind-body problem. …
[H]e was offering a new approach to problems of psychology, one
that he believed would not sink in the morass that have engulfed
previous psychologies.” (Reed, 1988, p. 280).
These characteristics of the theory of affordances are further evidenced in the debates about the nature of affordances presented in the suite of papers in Ecological Psychology, Volume 12(1). In this paper we propose an elaboration of the notion of affordance by suggesting that those persisting individual differences in behaviour described as temperamental differences (e.g., differences on a dimension of temperament anchored at one end by behaviour described as ‘outgoingness’ and at the other by behaviour described as ‘avoidance’) can be integrated into the theory of affordances. We argue that such integration is consistent with Gibson’s project as reflected in Reed’s words, and as part of our argument, draw parallels between the integration of temperament with the theory of affordances and the way in which individual differences in body dimensions are incorporated in the theory. We also outline some empirical tests of our proposition.
Notes Conference website : http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/ecopsyc/isep/ICPA-conf/
Language eng
Field of Research 170109 Personality, Abilities and Assessment
Socio Economic Objective 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
HERDC Research category E3.1 Extract of paper
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30025985

Document type: Conference Paper
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
Related Links
Link Description
Connect to published version
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 361 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 26 Mar 2010, 13:19:21 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.