Mental reinstatement of context with child witnesses : does it matter whether context is reinstated 'out loud'?
Dietze, Paul M., Powell, Martine B. and Thomson, Donald M. 2010, Mental reinstatement of context with child witnesses : does it matter whether context is reinstated 'out loud'?, Psychology crime and law, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 439-448, doi: 10.1080/10683160902905871.
Attached Files
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
Mental reinstatement of context with child witnesses : does it matter whether context is reinstated 'out loud'?
In this study we examined the impact of two types of mental reinstatement of context instructions in facilitating children's recall of a staged event across two stages of development. Specifically, a 2 times 3 factorial design was utilised incorporating two age groups (6- and 12-year-olds) and three interview conditions (standard recall, mental reinstatement where the child was instructed to reinstate the context 'out loud', and mental reinstatement without the explicit 'out loud' instruction). Overall, mental reinstatement instruction led to more correct and fewer incorrect responses than the standard recall instruction. The effect of mental reinstatement was similar across the age groups and irrespective of whether the child was asked to reinstate 'out loud'. Beneficial effects of the technique, however, were only evident for cued-recall questions as opposed to free-narrative responses. The implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.