Do indicated preventive interventions for depression represent good value for money?

Mihalopoulos, Cathrine, Vos, Theo, Pirkis, Jane, Smit, Filip and Carter, Rob 2011, Do indicated preventive interventions for depression represent good value for money?, Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 36-44, doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.501024.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Do indicated preventive interventions for depression represent good value for money?
Author(s) Mihalopoulos, CathrineORCID iD for Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Vos, Theo
Pirkis, Jane
Smit, Filip
Carter, RobORCID iD for Carter, Rob
Journal name Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
Volume number 45
Issue number 1
Start page 36
End page 44
Total pages 9
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Place of publication Abingdon, England
Publication date 2011-01
ISSN 0004-8674
Summary The prevention of depression is of growing interest to researchers and policy makers. However, the question of whether interventions designed to prevent depression provide value for money at a population level remains largely unanswered. The current study assesses the cost-effectiveness of two indicated interventions designed to prevent depression: a brief psychological intervention based on bibliotherapy and a more comprehensive group-based psychological intervention following opportunistic screening for sub-syndromal depression in general practice. Method: Economic modelling using a cost utility framework was used to assess the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the two interventions within the Australian population context, modelled as add-ons to current practice. The perspective was the health sector and outcomes were measured using disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Uncertainty was measured using probabilistic uncertainty testing and important model assumptions were tested using univariate sensitivity testing. Results: The brief bibliotherapy intervention had an ICER of AU$8600 per DALY and the group-based psychological intervention had an ICER of AU$20 000 per DALY. The majority of the uncertainty simulations for both interventions fell below the cost-effectiveness threshold value of $50 000 per DALY. Extensive sensitivity testing showed that the results were robust to the assumptions made in the analyses. Conclusions: Following screening in general practice, both psychological interventions, particularly brief bibliotherapy, appear to be good value for money and worthy of further evaluation under routine care circumstances. Acceptability issues associated with such interventions, particularly to primary care practitioners as providers of the interventions and health system administrators, also need to be considered before wide-scale adoption is contemplated.
Language eng
DOI 10.3109/00048674.2010.501024
Field of Research 140208 Health Economics (60%)
111714 Mental Health (20%)
111716 Preventive Medicine (20%)
Socio Economic Objective 920207 Health Policy Economic Outcomes (60%)
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
Population Health
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 26 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 25 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 937 Abstract Views, 6 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 04 Jan 2011, 11:10:12 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact