AssetDivider : a new mediation tool in Australian family law Bellucci, Emilia 2008, AssetDivider : a new mediation tool in Australian family law, in HUCOM 2008 : Proceedings of the first International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, HUCOM, [Delft, The Netherlands], pp. 11-18. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads bellucci-assestdivideranew-2008.pdf Published version application/pdf 476.23KB 184 Title AssetDivider : a new mediation tool in Australian family law Author(s) Bellucci, Emilia orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-411X Conference name International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation (1st : 2008 : Delft, The Netherlands) Conference location Delft, The Netherlands Conference dates 8-9 Dec. 2008 Title of proceedings HUCOM 2008 : Proceedings of the first International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Editor(s) Hindriks, Koen V. Brinkman, Willem-Paul Publication date 2008 Conference series International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation Start page 11 End page 18 Total pages 8 Publisher HUCOM Place of publication [Delft, The Netherlands] Keyword(s) negotiation support systems family law mediation Summary This article describes research in a new theory of decision support in negotiation in family law mediation. AssetDivider was based on the principles of Family_Winner. As a Negotiation Decision Support System Family_Winner takes ratings assigned to items by the parties involved and develops a list of allocations to each party; based on trade-offs inherently present in the dispute. Given advice provided from our industry partners Relationships Australia (Queensland) - RAQ, AssetDivider uses an ideal “percentage split” to guide the development of an allocation list for parties. The system has been tested informally by our contacts at RAQ, and we now look forward to extensive testing and evaluation by mediators at RAQ in the near future. We hope to report on a comprehensive evaluation which will report on the effectiveness of this program in practice. Notes Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner Language eng Field of Research 080699 Information Systems not elsewhere classified Socio Economic Objective 970108 Expanding Knowledge in the Information and Computing Sciences HERDC Research category E1.1 Full written paper - refereed Copyright notice ©2008, HUCOM Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30032773 Document type: Conference Paper Collections: School of Information and Business Analytics Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Wed, 16 Feb 2011, 12:57:46 EST Tue, 22 Feb 2011, 10:37:39 EST Tue, 22 Feb 2011, 10:38:52 EST Mon, 07 Mar 2011, 08:54:12 EST Mon, 07 Mar 2011, 08:56:46 EST Mon, 07 Mar 2011, 09:52:43 EST Mon, 07 Mar 2011, 09:54:30 EST Fri, 16 Mar 2012, 18:36:12 EST Sat, 17 Jun 2017, 03:04:26 EST Tue, 05 Dec 2017, 10:47:03 EST Fri, 07 Sep 2018, 15:16:32 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 7 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 821 Abstract Views, 184 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 16 Feb 2011, 12:57:46 EST