A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents

Lubans, D. R., Hesketh, K., Cliff, D. P., Barnett, L. M., Salmon, J, Dollman, J., Morgan, P. J., Hills, A. P. and Hardy, L. L. 2011, A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents, Obesity Reviews, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 781-799, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00896.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents
Author(s) Lubans, D. R.
Hesketh, K.ORCID iD for Hesketh, K. orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-7110
Cliff, D. P.
Barnett, L. M.ORCID iD for Barnett, L. M. orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-625X
Salmon, JORCID iD for Salmon, J orcid.org/0000-0002-4734-6354
Dollman, J.
Morgan, P. J.
Hills, A. P.
Hardy, L. L.
Journal name Obesity Reviews
Volume number 12
Issue number 10
Start page 781
End page 799
Total pages 19
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2011-10
ISSN 1467-7881
Keyword(s) measurement
Summary The aim of this review was to evaluate the reliability and validity of methods used to assess the multiple components of sedentary behaviour (i.e. screen time, sitting, not moving and existing at low energy expenditure) in children and adolescents. Twenty-six studies met our inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Thirteen studies reported the reliability of self- and proxy-report measures of sedentary behaviour and seven of these were found to have acceptable test–retest reliability. Evidence for the criterion validity of self- and proxy-report measures was examined in three studies with mixed results. Seven studies examined the reliability and/or validity of direct observation and the findings were generally positive. Five studies demonstrated the utility of accelerometers to accurately classify sedentary behaviour. Self-report measures provide reliable estimates of screen time, yet their validity remains largely untested. While accelerometers can accurately classify participants’ behaviour as sedentary, they do not provide information about type of sedentary behaviour or context. Studies utilizing measures of sedentary behaviour need to more adequately report on the validity and reliability of the measures used.We recommend the use of objective measures of sedentary behaviour such as accelerometers, in conjunction with subjective measures (e.g. self-report), to assess type and context of behaviour.
Notes Article first published online 16 June 2011
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00896.x
Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2011, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30036672

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 156 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 161 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 950 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 16 Aug 2011, 10:42:35 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.