Health literacy : what is it and why is it important to measure?

Buchbinder, Rachelle, Batterham, Roy, Ciciriello, Sabina, Newman, Stan, Horgan, Ben, Ueffing, Erin, Rader, Tamara, Tugwell, Peter S. and Osborne, Richard H. 2011, Health literacy : what is it and why is it important to measure?, Journal of rheumatology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1791-1797, doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110406.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Health literacy : what is it and why is it important to measure?
Author(s) Buchbinder, Rachelle
Batterham, RoyORCID iD for Batterham, Roy
Ciciriello, Sabina
Newman, Stan
Horgan, Ben
Ueffing, Erin
Rader, Tamara
Tugwell, Peter S.
Osborne, Richard H.
Journal name Journal of rheumatology
Volume number 38
Issue number 8
Start page 1791
End page 1797
Total pages 7
Publisher Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Place of publication Toronto, Canada
Publication date 2011-08
ISSN 0315-162X
Keyword(s) Health Literacy
Outcome Measures
Summary This report summarizes the proceedings of the first Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Health Literacy Special Interest Group workshop at the OMERACT 10 conference. Health literacy refers to an individual’s capacity to seek, understand, and use health information. Discussion centered on the relevance of health literacy to the rheumatology field; whether measures of health literacy were important in the context of clinical trials and routine care; and, if so, whether disease-specific measures were required. A nominal group process involving 27 workshop participants, comprising a patient group (n = 12) and a healthcare professional and researcher group (n = 15), confirmed that health literacy encompasses a broad range of concepts and skills that existing scales do not measure. It identified the importance and relevance of patient abilities and characteristics, but also health professional factors and broader contextual factors. Sixteen themes were identified: access to information; cognitive capacity; disease; expression/communication; finances; health professionals; health system; information; literacy/numeracy; management skills; medication; patient approach; dealing with problems; psychological characteristics; social supports; and time. Each of these was divided further into subthemes of one or more of the following: knowledge, attitude, attribute, relationship, skill, action, or context. There were virtually no musculoskeletal-specific statements, suggesting that a generic health literacy tool in rheumatology is justified. The detailed concepts across themes provided new and systematic insight into what needs to be done to improve health literacy and consequently reduce health inequalities. These data will be used to derive a more comprehensive measure of health literacy.
Language eng
DOI 10.3899/jrheum.110406
Field of Research 111717 Primary Health Care
Socio Economic Objective 920205 Health Education and Promotion
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2011, The Journal of Rheumatology
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 33 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 35 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 807 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 06 Dec 2011, 09:55:21 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact