Leading the evaluation of institutional online learning environments for quality enhancement in times of change Gosper, Maree, Holt, Dale, Palmer, Stuart, Allan, G., Hicks, M., Hollenbeck, R., Munro, Judy, Sankey, Michael and Solmonides, I. 2012, Leading the evaluation of institutional online learning environments for quality enhancement in times of change, in ASCILITE 2012 : Proceeding of the 29th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 353-358. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads gosper-leadingtheevaluation-2012.pdf Published version application/pdf 206.39KB 65 Title Leading the evaluation of institutional online learning environments for quality enhancement in times of change Author(s) Gosper, Maree Holt, Dale Palmer, Stuart orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-0597 Allan, G. Hicks, M. Hollenbeck, R. Munro, Judy Sankey, Michael Solmonides, I. Conference name Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Conference (29th : 2012 : Wellington, New Zealand) Conference location Wellington, New Zealand Conference dates 25-28 Nov. 2012 Title of proceedings ASCILITE 2012 : Proceeding of the 29th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Editor(s) Brown, M. Hartnett, M. Stewart, T. Publication date 2012 Conference series Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference Start page 353 End page 358 Total pages 6 Publisher ASCILITE Place of publication Wellington, New Zealand Keyword(s) online learning environments evaluation quality enhancement Summary This paper reports on findings from a nationally funded project which aims to design and implement a quality management framework for online learning environments (OLEs). Evaluation is a key component of any quality management system and it is this aspect of the framework that is the focus of this paper. In developing the framework initial focus groups were conducted at the five participating institutions. These revealed that, although regarded as important, there did not appear to be a shared understanding of the nature and purpose of evaluation. A second series of focus groups revealed there were multiple perspectives arising from those with a vested interest in online learning. These perspectives will be outlined. Overall, how evaluation was undertaken was highly variable within and across the five institutions reflecting where they were at in relation to the development of their OLE. ISBN 9780473229894 Language eng Field of Research 130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation 130304 Educational Administration, Management and Leadership Socio Economic Objective 970113 Expanding Knowledge in Education HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed Copyright notice ©2012, ASCILITE Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30051017 Document type: Conference Paper Collections: Faculty of Arts and Education Institute of Teaching and Learning Higher Education Research Group Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Connect to published version (restricted access) Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Wed, 06 Mar 2013, 12:40:36 EST Wed, 06 Mar 2013, 12:50:51 EST Thu, 07 Mar 2013, 08:26:16 EST Fri, 08 Mar 2013, 10:19:50 EST Mon, 03 Jun 2013, 12:07:43 EST Mon, 03 Jun 2013, 15:36:41 EST Mon, 03 Jun 2013, 15:37:54 EST Wed, 12 Jun 2013, 10:09:21 EST Tue, 03 Dec 2013, 14:07:32 EST Wed, 02 Jul 2014, 16:32:57 EST Wed, 21 Oct 2015, 14:41:16 EST Tue, 06 Sep 2016, 20:39:37 EST Tue, 05 Dec 2017, 12:39:15 EST Fri, 07 Sep 2018, 16:24:26 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 0 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 902 Abstract Views, 65 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 06 Mar 2013, 12:40:36 EST